Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)
Many thanks 2 u helpful techie types going over the same old questions
over and over.
Is the acquisition of over the air signal similar to that of a
satellite ? By that i mean a 45% signal on satellite is as decent a
picture as 85%. How good does your reception have to be to get a decent
HDTV picture? Thanks again 4 any opinions.
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)
psherry wrote:
>
> Many thanks 2 u helpful techie types going over the same old questions
> over and over.
> Is the acquisition of over the air signal similar to that of a
> satellite ? By that i mean a 45% signal on satellite is as decent a
> picture as 85%. How good does your reception have to be to get a decent
> HDTV picture? Thanks again 4 any opinions.
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)
On Mon, 08 Aug 2005 20:17:31 -0400, psherry <sherryclan@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Many thanks 2 u helpful techie types going over the same old questions
> over and over.
> Is the acquisition of over the air signal similar to that of a
> satellite ? By that i mean a 45% signal on satellite is as decent a
> picture as 85%. How good does your reception have to be to get a decent
> HDTV picture? Thanks again 4 any opinions.
It is digital, so with a certain signal strength you get a perfect
picture, and if it drops below that point, you get nothing. If you
get a signal that varies between those points, the picture may freeze, or
be sprinkled with artifacts (like a JPG enlarged too much).
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.