Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > Sound Cards > Do Sound Cards Affect System Performance?

Do Sound Cards Affect System Performance?

Forum CPU & Components : Sound Cards - Do Sound Cards Affect System Performance?

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

Do Sound Cards Affect System Performance?

I currently have an 8800 GTX p6n Q6600 Quad and 4 gigs of ram. I am using the motherboard audio piece.

I have heard that getting a "real audio card" will improve game performance(currently running AoC at about 30-60 fps). How true is this?


If it does, would you guys say this http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6829102006 is a good card?


Thanks for your time.

-Mike

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

sound cards wont affect gaming performance.... the only place you will see a difference is when using professional audio apps like cubase or pro tools.

Reply to psymanproductions

really, nowadays although i haven't seen any up to date test i would say not really.

in past years especially when the audigies were coming out and eax was becoming more advance you just couldn't rely on a cpu to process 64 different sounds with effects without a noticable performance impact, of course it is difficult to measure as creative always limited onboard to usally a couple of eax gen behind, now with openal i am not sure how it all works but i would imagine that cpu's like yours can handle themselves.

If you use XP and games which support EAX then it will benefit with a soundcard not really by performance but quality however with Openal games i am really not sure as i haven't seen any reviews.

might be worth searching for.

------------------------------ I'm a git, deal with it.

Antec 1200,PC Power & Cooling 750,Gigabyte DS4-x48,Intel Q9550@3.4 W/Xigmatek S1283,8GB OCZ DDR2 800,ATI 4870X2,X-FI>CA 640C amp>Tannoy R300/Senn 595's
Reply to strangestranger

no, not really, the amount you spend on that, which could be spent on more ram or a better cpu cool, increasing OC'ing potenial will be far greater.

if you got it, it would give you a couple extra FPS but not many.
if you have a decent set of speakers or headpones, then thing like games and music will sound allot better, especailly when loud.

psyman: IDK there are many people whp use protool and/or cubase that would use a sound card like the one above. i record my self, and almost all the work is done with external (optical or firewire) sound interfaces. or for bigger thing, digital mixers. this becasue sounbd card like creative one do not support ASIO, audio stream input output.

Reply to dobby

i've read it might do 1-5 fps increase. iam using x-fi music with 2 mb ram.

Reply to spotless

A good sound card might add a few FPS because your offloading the CPU. And offcourse the sound quality will be better but you will only notice it if you have a good sound system, and i,m not talking about a sub $100 speaker system.

Reply to col-p-todd

The short answer is yes. It does have an affect on performance. There will be a slight boost, although it might not be noticible.

Back when I got my audigy 2 I had winXP, an athlon 3000+ and 512mb of Ram... I noticed a nice little boost in FPS. With my current system, I dont think if I switched back to onboard I would notice a performance hit. I do however think that onboard sounds like poo... but thats not the issue at hand.

Reply to rfatcheric

Yes, definitely. Even a logitech usb headset has better performance compared to onboard HD audio. The difference is more pronounced on the min framerate and in events such as big explosions .

Reply to modtech

Even tho it will improve your FPS slightly I would only recommend it if you also want an improvement your sound quality, otherwise it is just an expensive way to get a few extra FPS.

Reply to col-p-todd

A small increase in fps but it would give you crisper, clearer sound. But you wont notice if you have some fairly cheap headphones OR speakers (~$100).
The sound card just offloads the CPU so it will give you a slight increase in performance but not very noticeable compared to modern day CPU's and Integrated sound chips.

Reply to fatty35

A few year's ago, I read that having a separate sound card can result in approximately a 5% improvement in CPU performance. I'd guess that with modern equipment, you could get a few percentage points of an improvement, but probably not even noticeable.

However, there's another problem with Vista -- no support for Creative Labs drivers (EAX). Which is the reason I have 2 SB cards at home sitting on a shelf, while I use the onboard sound on the ASUS motherboard. You can read a little about the Vista problems here:
http://apcmag.com/creative_puts_ea [...] _vista.htm

Given that the only Creative Labs card that will now work with Vista is the X-Fi, you're much better off putting that money elsewhere, as noted above (extra RAM, better graphics card, etc.).

Reply to capaill

I actually stopped using my sound card(original Audigy) for about a week because the Drivers for Vista in general were lacking and had bugs, e.g. When using either Teamspeak or Windows Live Messenger(sound clips via speaker button)My voice would become garbled, only a restart would fix it, I first noticed it when my friend with the same card switched to vista(64bit)....and then i had the issue as well when I upgraded my system and installed Vista Ult. 64bit.

so i got pissed and just started using my onboard sound. Till i played World In Conflict and the sound was cutting in and out and popping and hissing. I tried various driver versions all with the same result, So i compromised, I now use onboard for my Mic(no garbling) and the Audigy for my speakers. I also installed Daniel_K's drivers but i have yet to try using my mic on it as the onboard is just fine for that.

------------------------------ Intel Xeon E3110@3.4ghz/GA-P35-DS3L/4gigs DDR2-800(@756)/EVGA GTX 260 Core 216 55nm
/2xSeagate 320 1x160/Corsair 850 TX/21" Dell P1130 & M781s/ Vista Ult. 64 SP1

 

Reply to cliffro

mcavey wrote :

Do Sound Cards Affect System Performance?


If they are from Creative, YES they do affect badly

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by kad on 05-25-2008 at 09:28:28 PM
------------------------------ LianLi PC-A70 Case/Enermaqx Galaxy 1000W/Asus Rampage Formula/E8500/Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme Lapped/Scythe S-Flex SFF21F/Crucial Ballistic Red Line DDR2800 PC6400(2X2)GB/8800GTS 512MB/WD Raptor2X150GB/ViewSonic VX922(1280X1024Max)
Reply to kad

capaill wrote :

A few year's ago, I read that having a separate sound card can result in approximately a 5% improvement in CPU performance. I'd guess that with modern equipment, you could get a few percentage points of an improvement, but probably not even noticeable.

However, there's another problem with Vista -- no support for Creative Labs drivers (EAX). Which is the reason I have 2 SB cards at home sitting on a shelf, while I use the onboard sound on the ASUS motherboard. You can read a little about the Vista problems here:
http://apcmag.com/creative_puts_ea [...] _vista.htm

Given that the only Creative Labs card that will now work with Vista is the X-Fi, you're much better off putting that money elsewhere, as noted above (extra RAM, better graphics card, etc.).



thats not completely true. ALchemy will work with older cards at least audigy ones but it has to be paid for, it is only free for x-fi users however, also alot of newer games are using OpenAL and you will still, need a soundcard AFAIK to process some of the more advanced effects.

Also all this is also only for games and a soundcard can have other benefits as has been pointed out.

------------------------------ I'm a git, deal with it.

Antec 1200,PC Power & Cooling 750,Gigabyte DS4-x48,Intel Q9550@3.4 W/Xigmatek S1283,8GB OCZ DDR2 800,ATI 4870X2,X-FI>CA 640C amp>Tannoy R300/Senn 595's
Reply to strangestranger

I noticed a slight improvement going from onboard to my Audigy 2 Platinum. I did it more for the 5 1/4" front-panel with L/R inputs, though. (And any way I look at it, an $11 investment on ebay was worth at least TRYING.)

------------------------------ Pentium Dual-Core @ 3.33Ghz (333mhz x10)
4GB All Componets DDR2 800
Gigabyte GA-P35-DS3L
Visontek HD 4850 512MB GDDR3
Reply to Plyro109

Alchemy is now a free download for even the older SB audigy series. Theres also an unofficial ability to have dolby digital live on the x-fi cards found here http://forums.creative.com/creativ [...] ing&page=1 This was done by Daniel-K

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by jaydeejohn on 05-25-2008 at 11:26:24 PM
------------------------------ I went drifting, thru the capitols of tin, where men cant walk and cant freely talk, and sons turn their fathers in
Reply to jaydeejohn

It depends. Mixing the channels and calculating the 3D would use some of the CPU, but that's done on the HW nowadays - even with cheap chips.
However, I don't think all effects are done on the HW.
And how about the on-board memory? If the card has it's own memory, the samples can be loaded there so there's no need to constantly transfer (DMA) the sound data.

Reply to nirgal

Onboard sounds horrible compared to a decent sound card.

Reply to modtech

jaydeejohn wrote :

Alchemy is now a free download for even the older SB audigy series. Theres also an unofficial ability to have dolby digital live on the x-fi cards found here http://forums.creative.com/creativ [...] ing&page=1 This was done by Daniel-K


Creative was makeing people buy a "Vista" sound card when all that was needed was a driver...and -all- their sound cards would work with Vista (their Vista drivers are still crap).
When the public found this information out the sh!t hit the fan.

Unless your system is more than 5-6 years old you have no reason to use a sound card as the onboard sound is just as good for almost everyone.
If your so into music an think you can hear between them than you should be using a stand alone high end music system anyhow.

------------------------------ *While we crash and burn, small, low tech, agrarian societies such as the Hmong in the mountains of Laos will continue on without so much as blinking an eye.*
Reply to ZOldDude

Quote :

Yes, definitely. Even a logitech usb headset has better performance compared to onboard HD audio.



Can someone confirm or deny this? Why would a USB headset work better than onboard, isn't the sound still decoded from the cpu with USB? (Other than it just decoding in 2.1 instead of a say, 5.1)

Just double checking cause that seems contrary to what i've heard in the past.

Reply to bc4

Quote :

Yes, definitely. Even a logitech usb headset has better performance compared to onboard HD audio.



Can someone confirm or deny this? Why would a USB headset work better than onboard, isn't the sound still decoded from the cpu with USB? (Other than it just decoding in 2.1 instead of a say, 5.1)

Just double checking cause that seems contrary to what i've heard in the past.

Reply to bc4

I've personally tested that using fear and company of heroes as benchmarks. The headset got higher min and average fps with the same sound settings.

Reply to modtech

kad wrote :

If they are from Creative, YES they do affect badly



I shed a tear of joy reading this one. So true, so true.:D

------------------------------ Rock journalism is people who can't write interviewing people who can't talk for people who can't read - Frank Zappa
Reply to radnor

modtech wrote :

Onboard sounds horrible compared to a decent sound card.



No it doesn't.

Reply to Aintry

In oblivion, when firing an arrow at a longer than medium range you can hear a crisp but subtle thud (using a decent sound card). With onboard such as ac97 or HD soundmax, there's either no sound or an annoying static-ish whimper and this is just an example scratching the surface.

Reply to modtech

YEARS ago (we're talking 10+ years), I had a setup where I'd sometime get audio stuttering with my board. Turned out to be an issue with shared IRQ on the PCI slot I was using. I think it was being shared with the USB ports or something like that that got a lot of usage. Moving the audio card to a different slot solved the problem.

I always paid attention to IRQ sharing after that, don't know if that sort of thing is still an issue - PCI-E pretty much solves the whole problem if I'm not mistaken (which I could be).

Reply to snarfies1

there was a article the compared the two and there is like within 1 to 2% difference. It was awhile since I seen it. And your partially wrong Modtech. While there are different knids of onboard sound chips they all don't suck. My board uses a Realtek HD Audioand it sounds great. And I use Klipsch prodmedia 4.1's. Not exactly your $100 pair of speakers.

Reply to amb7247

Yes, but i also got a Realtek HD onboard autio and its sounds ugly :cry: thats why Im getting an x-fi extreme gamer sound card. :whistle: so lets see how the sound quality goes after i installed it :??: .

Reply to Andre192
Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > Sound Cards > Do Sound Cards Affect System Performance?
Go to:

There are 590 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them