Having been researching this for hours, I have thoroughly confused myself and have decided the only way my question is going to be answered is if I join a forum and specifically ask it. So here I am. And here is my dilemma:
I have a Dell 8400 with a Pentium 4 (Prescott) 3GHz (800MHz FSB) purchased in August (or July maybe) of 2004.
I am upgrading from 1 gig (2x512 DDR2-400 CL3) to 2 gig (2x1)* and am trying to decide between DDR2 400 with CL3 (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820134181) or DDR2 533 with CL4 (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820146569). Cost is not an issue since there's only a $2 difference. Most of what I have read focuses heavily on overclocking, which is irrelevant in my case (because it's a Dell) and something I wouldn't want to mess with anyway. I also read a lot dealing with AMD cpus and Core2Duos and irrelevant RAM (like older DDR1).
And something about 1:1 bus:ram ratio being good, which means the 400 would be better. I have no idea why. Is this significant?
So I guess my main question is which would be better for gaming and/or multitasking (multiple large Photoshop and/or Illustrator documents, Video editing, etc.) Which has a bigger performance impact: the CAS latency or the frequency? I know lower CL is faster, but how does the extra 133MHz and lower CL of the PC4200 affect performance? Is the extra bandwidth worth the higher latency? My current memory has a CL of 3 (according to cpu-z), btw.
*A third option is to go the cheaper route and add 2 more 512 sticks (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820144166), but I'm a bit nervous about mixing brands and I think 2x1 is supposed to be better than 4x512??? Something about the memory controller and voltage, I think. Any thoughts on this?
Thanks.
Edit: Crucial site shows DDR2 667 and 800 as compatible, but those weren't options when I bought mine, so I assume my motherboard doesn't support those speeds.
I have a Dell 8400 with a Pentium 4 (Prescott) 3GHz (800MHz FSB) purchased in August (or July maybe) of 2004.
I am upgrading from 1 gig (2x512 DDR2-400 CL3) to 2 gig (2x1)* and am trying to decide between DDR2 400 with CL3 (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820134181) or DDR2 533 with CL4 (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820146569). Cost is not an issue since there's only a $2 difference. Most of what I have read focuses heavily on overclocking, which is irrelevant in my case (because it's a Dell) and something I wouldn't want to mess with anyway. I also read a lot dealing with AMD cpus and Core2Duos and irrelevant RAM (like older DDR1).
And something about 1:1 bus:ram ratio being good, which means the 400 would be better. I have no idea why. Is this significant?
So I guess my main question is which would be better for gaming and/or multitasking (multiple large Photoshop and/or Illustrator documents, Video editing, etc.) Which has a bigger performance impact: the CAS latency or the frequency? I know lower CL is faster, but how does the extra 133MHz and lower CL of the PC4200 affect performance? Is the extra bandwidth worth the higher latency? My current memory has a CL of 3 (according to cpu-z), btw.
*A third option is to go the cheaper route and add 2 more 512 sticks (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820144166), but I'm a bit nervous about mixing brands and I think 2x1 is supposed to be better than 4x512??? Something about the memory controller and voltage, I think. Any thoughts on this?
Thanks.
Edit: Crucial site shows DDR2 667 and 800 as compatible, but those weren't options when I bought mine, so I assume my motherboard doesn't support those speeds.