So I have a Gateway MX6450 with an AMD Turion 64 ML-37. This, according to Gateway and AMDs website, is a 2.0 Ghz processor. When I run CPU-Z though, it pulls up all the correct information like names and cache sizes, but it says the CPU is running at 800MHZ with a Bus of 200 MHZ and x4 Multiplier. It also has 1 GB of RAM.
Now, I tried restarting the computer and when it came back up it said 2000 MHZ and a x10 multiplier. But...as I work on the computer and then leave it for a while, let it go into standy after a few hours, then come back, wake it up and run CPU-Z, it reads 800MHZ.
I have Windows XP Pro and I turned everything off on the start up menu (including in msconfig) so there is nothing running in the back ground except for my Trend Micro Internet Security Pro 2008 and the few drivers needed for the system. I use Thunderbird email and Internet Explorer (The anti-keylogger I have won't work with Mozilla) and pretty much all we do is check email and things on the interenet. It's not used for very intesive processes.
Any idea's on what can be causing this? Is this just a CPU-Z Error or is there a setting on my PC that is screwing something up? Maybe and XP error or does CPU-Z not interface with XP to get the info?
Now, I tried restarting the computer and when it came back up it said 2000 MHZ and a x10 multiplier. But...as I work on the computer and then leave it for a while, let it go into standy after a few hours, then come back, wake it up and run CPU-Z, it reads 800MHZ.
I have Windows XP Pro and I turned everything off on the start up menu (including in msconfig) so there is nothing running in the back ground except for my Trend Micro Internet Security Pro 2008 and the few drivers needed for the system. I use Thunderbird email and Internet Explorer (The anti-keylogger I have won't work with Mozilla) and pretty much all we do is check email and things on the interenet. It's not used for very intesive processes.
Any idea's on what can be causing this? Is this just a CPU-Z Error or is there a setting on my PC that is screwing something up? Maybe and XP error or does CPU-Z not interface with XP to get the info?