I voted Dual core with DDR2, however, i also have a quad core with ddr2... and if i was buying a machine in a few months, i would go with a quad core and ddr2
Thx!
We all be using ddr3 by this time next year when the new intel cpu's come out next nov.
The reason, i did this was ddr3 prices have dropped big time, you can now get 2Gb of good ddr3 1600mhz+ as need for the big boost in mem bandwidth. The new 1800 and 2000 allow high fsb for big oc systems.
i just thought i see who was planning on upgrading and who did.
Even though i have 790i, , x48 and x38 mobos sitting around in stock i still use ddr2. Then again i used my trustiy old 3.0c northwood shuttle clocked to 3.6ghz until last year!
wait a while, unless you can spend quite a few hundred dollars for a motherboard, you'll be stuck with PC3-10666.... and even with price drops you'll easily have to spend around 600$ + for a decent motherboard with decent DDR3 Ram speeds. So, if you want to upgrade later, you'll still have to change the motherboard!!!! Spend mostly on GPU power or maybe a 10k RPM hard-drive on which your games could be installed..
I guess I'd vote Quad core with DDR2 as that is my main gaming rig. But I also have some dual core systems with DDR2. Got some single core system with PC3200 also, but that's a whole other topic I don't want to cry over now.
With DDR2 so cheap, I stocked up on the best deals I could find. So it will be hard for me to go DDR3, If building another machine, it would almost without doubt be quad or dual core with DDR2. Mobo prices and DDR3 prices would have to come down more, and my stock of DDR2 would have to dry up before I'd build a DDR3 machine.
With prices the way they are now and the minimal performance gains that DDR3 give us, DDR2 with a quad core seems to be the best option.
It seems a waste to me to spend all that extra cash on a DDR3 motherboard just so you can turn around and spend even more cash on a product that only nets a small % higher performance. My cash is better spent on a better GPU and heatsink for my CPU and the large performance increases they bring.
------------------------------If the automobile had followed the same development cycle as the computer, a Rolls-Royce today would cost $100, get a million miles to the gallon, and explode once a year, killing everyone inside.
PSA
Reply to outlw6669
I have 2 machines with dual-core ddr2 and one older machine with single-core ddr2. I'm also one of those people who will be switching to ddr3 and quad-core when the next new build phase comes (although it won't be till another year or two). However I'll probably lose to the temptation of upgrading the processor on my older machine after the coming price drops in late Q3/early Q4... I don't really want to touch ddr3 right now and I can't anyway since all my mobos are ddr2. I still don't think the price/performance ratio is fair yet.
Message edited by klonedesu on 05-30-2008 at 03:21:52 PM
its really interesting that only 1 person or less then 5% use ddr3. the prices have only dropped in last few months i expect as this year goes on that percentage will go up significantly
also tells me that people are happy with ddr2, when ddr2 came out there seem to be alot of excitement but ddr3 is like the 3rd sequel - "ya i get it dvd" no rush to got to the move!
its ok - the reviews made it sound better then it is - the problem with that cooler is its too loud. when you turn it down its no better then 90mm thermalright.
note: the zalman fan control mounted on the psu as an after thought - the cpu cooler was too loud. every system we ship should be not too loud even if next to you with no sound on.
so i give this 3.7/5 scale
Message edited by dragonsprayer on 05-31-2008 at 01:41:36 AM
DDR3 is nice but it is over rated for now. once we start seeing intel/amd running ddr3 IMC's on their cpu's it will be a worthwhile endeavor. I also agree things a little snapper when running memory intensive programs/multitasking with DDR3. However not sure about you but when i am gaming @1080p i would much rather infect myself with the plague then try and in encode 2 HD video streams while playing COD4. maybe its just me but i like my frame rate in the double digits with as many of the goodies on i can get away with.
------------------------------Anywho back on planet earth where chaos reign's supreme....
Currently have a Quad and a stupid amount of DDR2 (because I can, that's why...) This one'll last until "The Next Build", a year or two from now. As for what that'll be?? Uncommitted, but it'll be the best of what's available for the cash I have to spend at that time. Neph, based on current info/forecasts. But that could change should AMD pull off a Hail Mary and beat Intel in absolute performance.
Message edited by Scotteq on 06-02-2008 at 02:56:46 PM
------------------------------Which Chip? Well, it depends on which set of thieving b@stardz you choose to support: The ones who use insider trading to enrich themselves while running their company into the ground, or the ones who illegally pay vendors to not support the first group.
Reply to Scotteq
i pretty sure vista uses the extra memory with AI, it sees what is not used.
then again no need for ready boots with stupid amounts of ram - it really only helps with 1gb or less
ddr3 prices are dropping fast and the peformace boost on paper is worth it - it has not tranferred to a boost in performance - i think hardware is ahead now and apps will need to take a big leep with mutli threading
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.