I am building a new system and I would like to have a fast hard drive! I am wondering if Western Digital's VelociRaptor models are the way to go. The 300 GB model seems quite pricey at $230, but if that's the cost of performance then I am willing to pay it.
However, the cost must be justified. Does this drive really thrash 7200 RPM HD's? Is there a high-performance/low-cost alternative to the VelociRaptors?
It depends on what you intend to do with the machine, the VelociRaptor has a good seek/random access time but there are other drives with better sustained transfer...
I am building a new system and I would like to have a fast hard drive! I am wondering if Western Digital's VelociRaptor models are the way to go. The 300 GB model seems quite pricey at $230, but if that's the cost of performance then I am willing to pay it.
However, the cost must be justified. Does this drive really thrash 7200 RPM HD's? Is there a high-performance/low-cost alternative to the VelociRaptors?
Your input is greatly appreciated. Thank you!
If your MOBO supports RAID, buy two of the WD 640 GB Black HDD's and set them up in a raid 0 array. One velociraptor will cost you $230.00 (which you alreay know), but two of the 640 GB Black drives will cost you $150.00 and setup in a raid 0, better performance. You can use the money you save to buy a backup drive or a better video card. I've had two of the 36 GB Velociraptor drives setup in RAID 0 for about 4 years now and they work great. Never missed a beat. You won't regret it.
I am also building a system. I am currently leaning towards:
OCZ Vertex Turbo Series 2.5" 30GB SATA II MLC Internal SSD
WD Caviar Black WD1001FALS 1TB 7200 RPM 32MB Cache SATA II 3.5 inch
If you want read speed then an SSD is what you want. The HDD is for the write mostly stuff, hopefully not frequent. I also plan on using tmpfs (Linux) to place temporary files in RAM.
EDIT: Fixed a typo.
Message edited by MikeJRamsey on 07-18-2009 at 06:44:02 PM
Intel X25-M does alot better in random writing than the HDD, although its sequential write speed is only 75MB/s, this tells nothing about the TRUE performance with software writing, where things like latency and IOps are much more important. The X25-M does very well in these, and future SSDs will totally blast HDDs off the performance charts. This already happens in random read operations (30.000 IOps for the SSD, 100-200 for the HDD).
------------------------------...man will occasionally stumble over the truth, but usually manages to pick himself up, walk over or around it, and carry on.
Reply to sub mesa
Intel X25-M does alot better in random writing than the HDD, although its sequential write speed is only 75MB/s, this tells nothing about the TRUE performance with software writing, where things like latency and IOps are much more important. The X25-M does very well in these, and future SSDs will totally blast HDDs off the performance charts. This already happens in random read operations (30.000 IOps for the SSD, 100-200 for the HDD).
I am not made of money.
The intel SSD is the best but the price is high.
Let me be clear; I have ordered both the SSD and HDD. The SSD is targeted for boot programs and other frequently read files. The HDD for write mostly and bulk storage. The price point is still in the HDD's favor for things like iTunes. BTW, I will be putting my new system together in the first week of August.
A "tiered" approach makes the most sense. A long and complex backup can be done while you are at lunch, or in the shower
The MOST frequently accessed files should be cached in RAM, e.g. using a reliable product like RamDisk Plus from www.superspeed.com .
The latest version utilizes unmanaged Windows memory under 32-bit XP, so bulk up on RAM e.g. 4GB or 8GB.
We recently created a 2GB ramdisk on a client's new AMD dual-core machine, with XP/Pro x32: WORKS GREAT!
We've moved our browser caches to ramdisks with great success: this also offloads the hard drive that would otherwise host these browser caches.
Also, a second, fast HDD is a good place to host the Windows swap file pagefile.sys if you don't have enough RAM to host it in a ramdisk.
Check out the freeware "Contig" program: you'll need to create a new pagefile.sys as the very first file on a newly formatted partition -- ideally the first partition on a second HDD so as to effect "short strokes" of the armature.
Then, change the attributes:
attrib pagefile.sys +A +S +H
(easy to remember: "ASH" )
Then, go into "My Computer" and move the swap file to that newly created and totally contiguous swap file.
Then, confirm its location on that new partition by using the Windows DEFRAG program: the swap file will be colored green after "analyzing" that partition with the DEFRAG program.
MRFS
Message edited by MRFS on 07-20-2009 at 01:24:08 AM
MRFS,
Good post. I am installing Ubuntu (AMD64) as the host OS so I will be using tmpfs instead of RAMDISK. I plan on putting the following directories in tmpfs
/tmp
/var/run
/var/lock
/var/crash
/var/log
/var/lib/xkb
/var/lib/gdm
/var/spool/cups
/var/spool/cups/tmp
I also plan on pointing Firefox's cache to tmpfs. I will be starting with 6 GB RAM in a 3X2GB configuration.
Windows 7 will be installed as a guest under Sun's VirtualBox. I am reserving the boot partition of the SSD for Windows 7 which will be installed in raw partition mode. The advantage of this is that both OS' will be available concurrently.
I haven't quite figured out what to do with the boot partition of the HDD.