So I'm not a gamer, but I am a computer junky, I do a lot of 3D and image analysis for my research.
From online reviews (Thanks Tom's!) and my price range I've decided go with the 8600GT or GTS.
My question is:
For my applications (loading large images, rendering, processing etc) will faster DDR3 at 256MB out preform DDR2 at 512MB for the video card? DDR3 @ 512MB is just out of my price range.
PC Config it will be going into:
XP
GA-EP35-DS3L
E8400 @ 3.6Ghz
2x2GB OZC @ 4-4-4-12 and 2.2v
What resolution is your display? Also what is your price range? I would generally say DDR3 256 would be the better option, in most cases, as opposed to DDR2 512MB. Unless you are at higher resolutions, in which the memory size becomes a limiting factor. Gaming is a little different when you talk about these items.
------------------------------Big Brother Rules with an Iron Fist
Reply to jay2tall
I find it very difficult to gauge relatively similar video cards respective performance by looking at the specs. It seems that it comes down to which has better architecture, or different kind of stream processors (vector processors or TMUs), driver support, and all of which are difficult to express in the specifications. The marketing teams also do a good job of skewing the data.
Best bet is to go by the charts to find out exactly which is better for what you will be using the card for.
Message edited by njalterio on 05-16-2008 at 09:53:49 PM
------------------------------Take my love, take my land, take me where I cannot stand.
I don't care, I'm still free you can't take the sky from me.
Reply to njalterio
It's a trade off between these cards. They have different architecture or configurations. Can't say which is better for you because all these cards perform relatively close to each other and excel at different things. It all comes down to what you want and what you want to spend on it.
I do advise going for a 512meg card for Nvidia cards at that resolution but you can get away with 384mb card. AMD cards are better at memory management even a 256mb card can run that resolution without much of a problem.
I do advise going for a 512meg card for Nvidia cards at that resolution but you can get away with 384mb card. AMD cards are better at memory management even a 256mb card can run that resolution without much of a problem.
Agreed
For your monitor and resolution and no gaming you need more bandwidth
Go for ATI (512MB) card
------------------------------LianLi PC-A70 Case/Enermaqx Galaxy 1000W/Asus Rampage Formula/E8500/Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme Lapped/Scythe S-Flex SFF21F/Crucial Ballistic Red Line DDR2800 PC6400(2X2)GB/8800GTS 512MB/WD Raptor2X150GB/ViewSonic VX922(1280X1024Max)
Reply to kad
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.