Tom's Hardware Forums » CPU & Components » CPUs » Another CPU FSB / Mobo FSB / RAM question
 

Another CPU FSB / Mobo FSB / RAM question




Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : Another CPU FSB / Mobo FSB / RAM question
 
Profile: stranger
More Information

Heres my question:
I was planning on building my new setup with the following main parts:

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450/ 2.66GHz/ 1333FSB
Corsair DDR3 4GB PC-10600/1333 Ram
Asus P5E3 motherboard (FSB > 1600 / 1333 / 1066 / 800 MHz)

Now from what I've been reading in this forum with all this "FSB : Ram ratio = 1:1" stuff is that because the CPU is quad pumped its real FSB is 333.

Does this mean there would be no performance losses if I were to put, say 4GB of 667MHz DDR2 Ram in with a compatible motherboard???

Because I am a little confused how this all works can we please leave this feed on stock clock speeds for now.

Thanks in advance for anyone who can shed some light on this issue

Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

I looked at OCing my SNES but chickened out.
Profile: old hand
More Information

667 will be slower than 1333 although I couldn't tell you technicalities of ratios, "quad pumping" and FSBs.

Profile: addict
More Information

FSB is quad pumped so you take the base speed and multiply by 4 when your taking about core 2 chips.

FSB=Base FSB x4
1333=333x4

The CPU speed is the base speed times the multiplier
2660mhz=333x8

The FSB speed that matter with stock speed is 1333 which means you could go as low as ddr2 667 and not have a performance loss. (assuming you dual channel the memory the 667x2=1333)

The ratio allows the memory and the CPU to stay in sync. 1:1 is ideal. but if you ram is faster it will alter it so that the effective is 1:1. (can't figure an example right now.)

Long story short. at stock speed the slowest ram you can buy is ddr2 667 and if your ram is faster then your cpu then you will not expierence a performance loss, you will just not utilize your memory to it's fullest extent.

Profile: stranger
More Information

Thanks guys for your help, does that mean that fast ram (1066 onwards) effectively only helps when over-clocking? I mean, I dont think there are any chips from Intel that would be able to utilize ram @ 1066, 1333 or even 1600 when running at their stock speeds???

Profile: addict
More Information

mi!ez:
Yes 667 is slower then 1333. but keep in mind that memory is run in dual channel to double is speed. 667x2=1333

gtown
yes faster ram is only useful when overclocking. The next intel chip will use ddr3 and a triple memory bandwidth. So if your building now there is no real point in getting the faster memory. I would at least get ddr2 800. the extra bandwidth will help with small overclocks which are easy enough on most motherboards


Go to:
 

Google Ads
Ad
News

Intel forecast to cut P4 price by up to 34%

Published on July 08, 2004

Intel will trim its Pentium 4 and Celeron D prices on 22 August, Taiwanese mobo maker sources have claimed, ahead of the anticipated launch of the 3.8 GHz Pentium 4 570. Read more

Mobo makers facing component shortages

Published on July 29, 2005

Motherboard makers are facing component shortages that may threaten their business during the high season in the second half of the year, industry sources said. Read more

Mobo shipments to drop 5-15 percent in 2Q

Published on April 26, 2005

First-tier motherboard makers Asustek Computer, Elitegroup Computers (ECS) and Gigabyte Technology expect their second quarter's shipments to fall 5-15 percent on quarter, according to the companies. Read more

Intel to ship 1.8 GHz Centrino as Pentium M 745

Published on April 05, 2004

Intel hasn't been backward in coming forward about its upcoming 32-bit microprocessor naming scheme, but it's kept mum about the finer details. Read more

Latest Reviews & Articles

Four GeForce 9600 GT Cards Compared

Published on September 26, 2008

Manufacturers really love the first Geforce 9. The graphic chip is fast, the cards are inexpensive, and some retailers offer more than ten variations. Read more

Maxtor's Shared Storage Does NAS At Home

Published on September 25, 2008

What do you do with all the data you collect at home? Network attached storage is the solution. We test Maxtor's Shared Storage II and find that it is also suitable for use in small businesses. Read more

SLI & Centrino 2: Gaming Laptops Battle

Published on September 24, 2008

Take four gaming laptops. Arm two of them with SLI and make the others Centrino 2-compatible. You're looking at a high-end collection of the latest mobile technology battling it out for benchmark supremacy and your hard-earned dollars. Read more

1,000 GB: Three Samsung TB Drives

Published on September 23, 2008

Storage vendors split the desktop hard drive market into performance, mainstream, and energy-efficient products. We looked at Samsung’s Spinpoint F, the RAID version and the EcoGreen F to discover how a 1,000 GB drive differs from another. Read more