Ad
News

Kingston packs data recovery software on Compact Flash cards

Published on August 15, 2006

Kingston today said that will be upgrading its "ultimate" line of Compact Flash (CF) cards by preloading Ontrack's Easy Recovery Professional software 6.1 onto the devices. Read more

Abit recalls AN9 32X motherboards

Published on July 21, 2006

Abit today said that its quality control department found that "rough handling during shipments" may have damaged "a small number of units from the early manufacturing of the AN9 32X product line." Read more

Intel Fine Tunes Processor Pricing, Increases Pressure On AMD

Published on July 22, 2008

Santa Clara (CA) - Intel's latest round of processor price represents a very subtle adjustment of prices the market widely seems to have accepted. Read more

"Bumps" help to create scratch-less CD-R

Published on December 21, 2005

CDs and DVDs already are tough to scratch under everyday circumstances, but just in case your your music and data CDs get damaged once in a while there is a new option that may keep your discs from getting scratched. Highlands Ranch, Col.-based Scratch-Less Disc integrates bumps and ridges onto surface of a CD to craete a "scratch-resistant" CD. Read more

Latest Reviews & Articles

System Builder Marathon: $500 Gaming PC

Published on October 30, 2008

For the second to last day of our System Builder Marathon series, we add a $500 gaming PC to the mix. It's not going to be as quick as our other two builds, but we think Paul was able to get some serious value from this thing. Read more

Tom's SBM: The $1,500 Mainstream PC

Published on October 29, 2008

We're following up yesterday's $4,500 behemoth with a more affordable $1,500 mid-range build. Let's see what sort of performance (and overclocking headroom) you can get when you spend one third of the money. Read more

System Builder Marathon: The $4,500 Super PC

Published on October 28, 2008

This month's System Builder Marathon spreads the system prices out even further to $4,500, $1,500, and $500. Is today’s $4,500 system really worth three times as much as an upper-mainstream performance machine? Read more

Can Your Old Athlon 64 Still Game?

Published on October 24, 2008

We'd all love to upgrade every time a new piece of gaming hardware drops, but that's an expensive proposition. You think your Athlon 64 system is fairly quick--any chance a simple graphics upgrade can bring it up speed? We're aiming to find out. Read more

  Tom's Hardware Forums » CPU & Components » CPUs » E8400 CPU Damaged?
 

E8400 CPU Damaged?




Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : E8400 CPU Damaged?
 
Profile: stranger
More Information

Hi everyone,

Quick question and i'll explain after.

Is it normal that your cpu has tiny little dents on it's sensor after being installed? Meaning the circualer sensors undereath the cpu that the motherboard's teeth make contact with. Is it normal that a tiny dent is visible when the cpu is removed?

I finally upgraded to Intel, well I tried. This is the fourth machine I built, I even dared to go for watercooling. I have the N500 from corsair. With an AMD ATX mortherboard the mount was a clip that secured itlself on the plastic mount of the board. But with the LGA775 mounting, its 4 posts that are snaped onto the motherboard and then you snap on an "X" shaped metal plate over the heatsink to hold everything in place. You do have to apply a bit of pressure to make the clips snap, but nothing strenous in my opinion.

Aniways, I suspect the board being troublesome since it fails the POST test. I don't even get videocard detection. So I made sure everything was well plugged and clipped in, with no chance. I then proceeded to remove everything from the mobo for RMA. But I looked under the CPU and noticed that where the motherboard's teeth met the cpu I can see tiny "dents". I guess it should be normal since it's probably the imprint that the connectors make upon contact?

Thank you in advance.


ASUS P5N-D
Intel E8400 LGA 775
N500 Corsair WC



Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

kad
Profile: addict
More Information

Vhorthex wrote :

But I looked under the CPU and noticed that where the motherboard's teeth met the cpu I can see tiny "dents". I guess it should be normal since it's probably the imprint that the connectors make upon contact


Refer to your Processor and mobo manuals and make sure you're installing processor correctly. I have some doubts from your description that you are forcing processor in its place


---------------
LianLi PC-A70 Case/Enermaqx Galaxy 1000W/Asus Rampage Formula/E8500/Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme Lapped/Scythe S-Flex SFF21F/Crucial Ballistic Red Line DDR2800 PC6400(2X2)GB/8800GTS 512MB/WD Raptor2X150GB/ViewSonic VX922(1280X1024Max)
Profile: newbie
More Information

Did you have to physically push the CPU down to fit it in the socket? Every time I've installed an LGA775 CPU it's more or less sat directly onto the pins if it's aligned properly.

Profile: stranger
More Information

Some motherboards will need to have their BIOS updated to run the 45nm cpus, my Asus Maximus formula needed it. Try to find a 65nm core duo to boot up and update the bios, i know it's alot of trouble if you don't have one or you can also see a computer shop. Hope everything works good after that because the E8400 is an awesome CPU!

PS : I thought it was pretty hard to close the locking arm for the cpu at first too.


Message edited by ThrillerGTX on 06-07-2008 at 01:57:22 PM

---------------
Intel E8400 @ 3960mhz | Asus Maximus Formula | Asus 8800GTX
4x2GB OCZ 6400 Vista Perf @1058MHz/5-5-5-12 | Zalman 9700 Nvidia
Antec 900 | 500W Enermax Modular | Acer P243W | Vista Ultimate x64 | G15/G5
Profile: Forum Veteran
More Information

To the main Question:

"Is it normal that your cpu has tiny little dents on it's sensor after being installed? Meaning the circualer sensors undereath the cpu that the motherboard's teeth make contact with. Is it normal that a tiny dent is visible when the cpu is removed?"

So your referring to the Pin Contacts on the bottom of the CPU. I've noticed that as well, but my CPU's are working. The amount of pressure from the retention bracket and HS mount would affect that. So I'd say it's normal to see.

I'd agree that what the other say, it could be a bios problem, since it may have an earlier version of it.

Or it's possible that you may have some bent array pins that are causing the problem.

Profile: stranger
More Information

Thank you for all the replies.

@ Kad & Demonic
No I didn't force the CPU in, it's pretty simple now with the new concept that the pins are on the cpu, but on the motherboard. So I had no trouble with it. It fell into place easily. Like someone said here, I did feel ligthly concerced to the amount of pressure the locking arm did, but It's normal. So al is good on this front.

@ ThrillerGT X
Nope, the P5N-D is 65nm ready. No need to update the bios. But aniways, I couldn't even reach a bios update since the board fails the POST test.

@Grimmy
Ahh, that's what I was talking about. Nice, Yeah I guessed that it was normal to see tiny little "dents" from that Pin Contacts under the CPU. And No the Pins from the Motherboard are not bent. If so they are all symetrically bent all in the same direction thus fooling me :).

So In retrospec it IS my motherboard. From what I think the beep code meant a LONG - SHORT X3, which seems to refer to video initialization. I tried switching my ram from spot, try 1 or 2 sticks. I tried both PCI-E slots, unpluged all my HDD's or DVD's, and still. Just with PSU, RAM, CPU, Vcard, still the same failing of the POST.

I was told that PCI-E slot failures weren't so uncommon in motherboards, either that or bad memory slots. This just goes to further my belief that I am cursed as to computer hardware. I always have to switch things at least once.

And I know that all the other components work, RAM, Vcard, PSU, for they are from my old machine (that i'm using now). So it has to be either CPU or Mobo. But the CPU seems fine and my fears fall on the motherboard.

Aniways, i'm going to see the retailer to replace it this coming monday.

Thanks for everything!

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by Vhorthex on 06-07-2008 at 06:36:25 PM
Profile: newbie
More Information

Have you tried turning it on with everything but the CPU removed from the motherboard? If you still get the same beep pattern doing that then you may want to try taking the CPU out as well. If you get a different beep pattern after taking the CPU out then it'd be pretty safe to say your CPU is ok.

Also with your ram, does it use a standard voltage or a higher voltage than normal? A lot of enthusiast DDR2 ram uses between 2.0-2.2v during normal operation. I used to have a pair of corsair modules I had to run at 2.2v, but the board would never boot up with them in it because the correct voltage wasn't set. I had to go out and buy some crappy low voltage ram to get the board to boot, then i went into the bios, set the 2.2v and put my corsair ram in. Man that sucked! Everytime I got a failed overclock and had to reset the CMOS I had to go through that whole mess with the ram!

It may just be a bad motherboard though. The last Asus motherboard I bought arrived DOA, and the last 680i SLI motherboard (BFG) I bought arrived DOA. I wonder what happened to the days where DOA boards were a rare occurance?

Anyways, good luck!

Profile: enthusiast
More Information

E8400 is 45nm, try to get 65nm Core 2 DUO and boot with that to upgrade bios.

Profile: newbie
More Information

ainarssems wrote :

E8400 is 45nm, try to get 65nm Core 2 DUO and boot with that to upgrade bios.



If you look his board up on ASUS's website it shows that it has support for 45nm CPUs, he shouldn't need to update his BIOS.

Profile: addict
More Information

Vhorthex wrote :

Thank you for all the replies.

@So In retrospec it IS my motherboard. From what I think the beep code meant a LONG - SHORT X3, which seems to refer to video initialization.



Is the CPU power connector connected? That's the 4 or 8-pin connector that mates to a socket near the CPU on the MB. Even with my long experience with PC's I forgot that when rebuilding a system last night. Also make sure the CORRECT connector is on the video card.

Profile: stranger
More Information

Jesus, I can't believe I did such a stupid typo. The P5N-D is 45nm READY, sorry! Not 65nm lol.

No I did not try to boot with the cpu not connected. But at this point i'll simply return the motherboard.

And no I have XMS2 whihc runs at default voltages.

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by Vhorthex on 06-07-2008 at 08:20:44 PM
Profile: Honorary Poster
More Information

doesn't the xms2 run at 1.9volt? stock ddr-2 voltage is only 1.8...it could be enough to make it not POST.

Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information

"So In retrospec it IS my motherboard. From what I think the beep code meant a LONG - SHORT X3, which seems to refer to video initialization. I tried switching my ram from spot, try 1 or 2 sticks. I tried both PCI-E slots, unpluged all my HDD's or DVD's, and still. Just with PSU, RAM, CPU, Vcard, still the same failing of the POST."

sounds like a memory issue from the beep code maybe


---------------
P35-DS3L l E8400 @ 3.6Ghz l OCZ Vendetta 2 l 4GB G.Skill 8000PQ@1000mhz 4:5 l WD3200AAKS 320GB l Evga 8800GTS 512 l Creative SB X-Fi Xtreme Music l Corsair HX520 l Antec Sonata III 500 l Vista Home Premium32 SP2 build 6002
Profile: stranger
More Information

My motherboard was 45nm ready and it still needed a bios upgrade.


---------------
Intel E8400 @ 3960mhz | Asus Maximus Formula | Asus 8800GTX
4x2GB OCZ 6400 Vista Perf @1058MHz/5-5-5-12 | Zalman 9700 Nvidia
Antec 900 | 500W Enermax Modular | Acer P243W | Vista Ultimate x64 | G15/G5
Profile: Forum Veteran
More Information
n°1826775
06-07-2008 at 10:46:45 PM
Hide