Tom's Hardware Forums » CPU & Components » CPUs » q9300 vs q6600
 

q9300 vs q6600

Add a reply



 Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : q9300 vs q6600
 
Profile: stranger
More Information

about to go and but either one which is better

Related Pr oduct
Register or log in to remove.

"When in doubt, blow sh*t up!"
Profile: enthusiast
More Information

Q9300, the q6600 might overclock a tad bit more but the q9300 has other advantages. If you could I'd even go for the Q9450, that way you get the full 12mb of L2 cache.

Profile: stranger
More Information

if you want to OC beyond 3.5ghz then go for the Q6600, otherwise the Q9300 wins by a whisker (at stock) and runs a lot cooler than the former. ultimately its upto you to decide.


Message edited by mindfields on 06-08-2008 at 07:22:21 PM
Profile: member
More Information

MrsBytch wrote :

Read the June 2008 issue of Maximum PC's Deathmatch: Q6600 vs. Q9300.

 

Using a 790i ultra the Q9300 was the better overclocker able to hit 3.5 on air "without a sweat" according to the article ( read it and weep kids dont argue with me) and the better overall performer.

Link plz, I can't find it. Oh, and theres more to overclocking than temperature of the cpu. No doubt at any speed the q9300 would run cooler, but the chipsets starts becoming an issue at that fsb. And the voltage? Putting 1.4 volts through a q6600 is safe, yet that voltage through a q9300 would quickly degrade the processor due to its 45nm architecture. In short, yes, with a good motherboard it is easier to achieve higher speeds with the q9300, but for the average user using it in an everyday comp for 2-3 years, the q6600 is the better choice.

 


---------------
"Quad cores are only good for burning CD's"
Q6600 @ 3.3 | Xigmatek HDT-S1283 |
8800gts G92 512mb (756/1890/1044) | GA-P35-DS3L
Profile: stranger
More Information

here are the prices i dont like buying stuff online since i am never home when the stuff comes so i need to buy it locally ok the q9600 is 229 with retail cpu
the 9300 is 259 with a cheap ecs mobo and no heat sink.o btw will a cooler from a e6300 work with either of these cpus?

Profile: addict
More Information

My new system is running a Q6600 and hit 3Ghz easily with a minor Voltage bump, I've not experimented any further yet though. If the Q6600 didn't overclock well then I would of Bought the E8400. The Q9300 is a newer 45nm chip, but it costs more while not offering enough over the Q6600 to Justify the price. The Q9450 is the best 45nm choice, but still too expensive...the Bang for Buck goes with the Q6600 by a mile.

Profile: stranger
More Information

i love my ecs mobo i mean i love ecs i always had luck with em far as stabilty but they stink for ocing this ecs board only has fsb choices of 266 or 333 nothing in the middle

Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information

The Q6600 is great if you planning to overclock far, it will run warmer than the q9300. The Q9300 is kinda handicapped for overclocking with the low multi and half the cache. The Q9450 would be good if you can get it, or better yet the Q9550 if you have the cash.


Go to:
Add a reply
  Tom's Hardware Forums » CPU & Components » CPUs » q9300 vs q6600
 

Google Ads
Ad
News

Alienware announces desktop PC with Intel's latest quad-core processor

Published on January 11, 2007

Alienware said it "will" launch Intel's second quad-core desktop processor, the 2.4 GHz Core 2 Quad Q6600, on its Area-51 7500 desktop system. Read more

CES 2007: Intel rolls out new quad-core processor Core 2 Quad Q6600

Published on January 08, 2007

Intel is enjoying its lead in the current microprocessor market and today announced more CPUs with four cores. There are three new quad-cores altogether, one desktop processor and two chips for entry-level servers. Read more

Gateway Upgrades Retail PCs To Up To 6 GB Of Memory

Published on June 30, 2008

Gateway announced its updated retail notebook and desktop PC offering for the back-to-school season with prices ranging from $549. Read more

Gateway Ships Retail PCs With 64-bit Windows Vista

Published on May 06, 2008

Irvine (CA) - You knew it was coming. Read more

Latest Reviews & Articles

Four GeForce 9600 GT Cards Compared

Published on September 26, 2008

Manufacturers really love the first Geforce 9. The graphic chip is fast, the cards are inexpensive, and some retailers offer more than ten variations. Read more

Maxtor's Shared Storage Does NAS At Home

Published on September 25, 2008

What do you do with all the data you collect at home? Network attached storage is the solution. We test Maxtor's Shared Storage II and find that it is also suitable for use in small businesses. Read more

SLI & Centrino 2: Gaming Laptops Battle

Published on September 24, 2008

Take four gaming laptops. Arm two of them with SLI and make the others Centrino 2-compatible. You're looking at a high-end collection of the latest mobile technology battling it out for benchmark supremacy and your hard-earned dollars. Read more

1,000 GB: Three Samsung TB Drives

Published on September 23, 2008

Storage vendors split the desktop hard drive market into performance, mainstream, and energy-efficient products. We looked at Samsung’s Spinpoint F, the RAID version and the EcoGreen F to discover how a 1,000 GB drive differs from another. Read more