Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question

q9300 vs q6600

Tags:
Last response: in CPUs
Share
June 8, 2008 4:45:18 PM

about to go and but either one which is better

More about : q9300 q6600

June 8, 2008 4:56:50 PM

Q9300, the q6600 might overclock a tad bit more but the q9300 has other advantages. If you could I'd even go for the Q9450, that way you get the full 12mb of L2 cache.
June 8, 2008 5:21:34 PM

if you want to OC beyond 3.5ghz then go for the Q6600, otherwise the Q9300 wins by a whisker (at stock) and runs a lot cooler than the former. ultimately its upto you to decide.
Related resources
June 8, 2008 5:52:39 PM

Quote:
Read the June 2008 issue of Maximum PC's Deathmatch: Q6600 vs. Q9300.

Using a 790i ultra the Q9300 was the better overclocker able to hit 3.5 on air "without a sweat" according to the article ( read it and weep kids dont argue with me) and the better overall performer.
Link plz, I can't find it. Oh, and theres more to overclocking than temperature of the cpu. No doubt at any speed the q9300 would run cooler, but the chipsets starts becoming an issue at that fsb. And the voltage? Putting 1.4 volts through a q6600 is safe, yet that voltage through a q9300 would quickly degrade the processor due to its 45nm architecture. In short, yes, with a good motherboard it is easier to achieve higher speeds with the q9300, but for the average user using it in an everyday comp for 2-3 years, the q6600 is the better choice.

June 8, 2008 6:12:46 PM

here are the prices i dont like buying stuff online since i am never home when the stuff comes so i need to buy it locally ok the q9600 is 229 with retail cpu
the 9300 is 259 with a cheap ecs mobo and no heat sink.o btw will a cooler from a e6300 work with either of these cpus?
June 8, 2008 6:27:58 PM

My new system is running a Q6600 and hit 3Ghz easily with a minor Voltage bump, I've not experimented any further yet though. If the Q6600 didn't overclock well then I would of Bought the E8400. The Q9300 is a newer 45nm chip, but it costs more while not offering enough over the Q6600 to Justify the price. The Q9450 is the best 45nm choice, but still too expensive...the Bang for Buck goes with the Q6600 by a mile.
June 8, 2008 6:40:48 PM

i love my ecs mobo i mean i love ecs i always had luck with em far as stabilty but they stink for ocing this ecs board only has fsb choices of 266 or 333 nothing in the middle
June 8, 2008 6:53:03 PM

The Q6600 is great if you planning to overclock far, it will run warmer than the q9300. The Q9300 is kinda handicapped for overclocking with the low multi and half the cache. The Q9450 would be good if you can get it, or better yet the Q9550 if you have the cash.
!