Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > 9800 GX2 Performance Gain With new Drivers

9800 GX2 Performance Gain With new Drivers

Forum Graphic & Displays : Graphics Cards - 9800 GX2 Performance Gain With new Drivers

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

Well I finally got around to installing the new Nvidia Forceware 175.16.

I've seen significant increases in performance.

Crysis is now running very smooth.

At the Intro of the game, I would get around 30-34 fps when you receive your orders. Now my frames shot up to the 60s....its really interesting.

As I played through the game, the frames stayed over 60 and I was very shocked because usually they would dip every now and then to around 30.

The resolution is at 1280x1024.

I also tried Cod 4 but that game ran well before as well, the frames are just higher now. Really didn't mean much.

I'll try some more and create benchmarks.

------------------------------ Folding@HOME Team: 163116
http://pid.us.playstation.com//user/L1qu1dat1on.jpg
Lapped CPU
http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/501789.png
Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

That's good to know man, do me a favor, tell me what drivers you switched from. Also, (no offense) but, why are you gaming in 1280x1024 w/ a GX2 ? Or is that just for playing Crysis. Anyways, I will do some of my own benchmarks for Crysis at 1920x1200 and post them here. What settings are you using ? AA or AF ? Ultra High ? High ? Cracked Ultra High ? Thanks man.

------------------------------ Core i7 920 @ 4.0Ghz - Asus P6T - 12GB Corsair XMS 3 - 2X ATI 58701GB Crossfire- Zalman 850W - X-FI Fatality Gamer Pro - Xigmatek Thor's Hammer - Raptor X 150 - WD Black 1TB OCZ Vertex Turbo 120 GB SSD - Cosmos S Case w/side window + 8X 120mm fans
Reply to annisman
- 0 +

Yes, get a new monitor and play at a higher resolution. You might be CPU limited like I am at 1280 x 1024 (still have a 17" CRT -- saving up for a 24" LCD). Both the 9800gx2 and 3870x2 cry out for 24" LCD resolutions to get the best framerates.

I really hope Huang decides to innovate and supports the next Nvidia dual GPU card on one PCB, and both Nvidia and ATI need to go to shared memory for the CPU, because both the 9800gx2 and 3870x2 are somewhat hampered by only 512 megs of RAM per GPU.

We'll probably see dual core discrete GPU's alongside quad core CPU's with one GPU core within a few years. The dual GPU cards are a step in the right direction, but Nvidia needs to get their thermals and power usage down a bit. The days of monster cards from any company are soon to be past.

------------------------------ Phenom 8750, ASUS M3A78T
4 gigs Kingston DDR2 800 two 1T SAMSUNG HD103UI
Sapphire 4870x2, Sony BDU-X10S BD-ROM
Antec Neo 650 PSU Antec Nine Hundred, Acer H213H 1080p LCD
Reply to yipsl
- 0 +

everything was maxed out. THe AA was off because I really can't tell the diff in Crysis.

Windows Vista 64 bit.

I'm running it on this monitor because I blew all my money on the Wii fit, and MGS 4, but I'm getting a monitor in July for sure.

But check this out, the card is running max fan speed and the temps are 39 LMAO and 45 while gaming:D

I switched from 174.74

Anyways I did some more tests.

Rainbow six Vegas 2 didn't benefit much from the drive upgrade, I was gettin 32 frames in the intro where you meet eveything and now i'm getting 39.

Unreal Tournament 3 runs with out and hiccups, and the Call of Juarez Benchmark finally runs smooth compared to 15 fps -40, now its at 30+ constantly.

Anywho benchmarks your card annisman and let me know:)

------------------------------ Folding@HOME Team: 163116
http://pid.us.playstation.com//user/L1qu1dat1on.jpg
Lapped CPU
http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/501789.png
Reply to L1qu1d

I also saw a insignificant boost in Crysis with the new drivers and my two 9800GTX's running with XP Pro 32bit. I have some of the settings set at Very High with the DX9 hack (shaders, physics, objects) and get around 50 FPS at the level you are talking about (1920x1200 no less).

Reply to scooterlibby
- 0 +

yeah I just hooked my computer up to my dad's HD TV and the frames still stayed over 60 i'm really surprised. OFC there were a couple of hiccups.

meh!

I had to overclock the GX2 to match 2 9800 GTXs though. lol

------------------------------ Folding@HOME Team: 163116
http://pid.us.playstation.com//user/L1qu1dat1on.jpg
Lapped CPU
http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/501789.png
Reply to L1qu1d

I think ET:QW did not like the new drivers for me though. Had to reinstall and tweak the hell out of that game's cvars to get close to my old performance.

Reply to scooterlibby

scooterlibby wrote :

I think ET:QW did not like the new drivers for me though. Had to reinstall and tweak the hell out of that game's cvars to get close to my old performance.



Which is also a reason I think I'm ditching the SLI setup and replacing it with one GTX280.

Reply to scooterlibby
- 0 +

yeah I had the same prob with call of Juarez benchmarks. but I restarted my comp and it went up:S

I swear computers will be a mystery:P LOL!

meh!

I haven't Tried source engine but I doubt it will be any happier with the driver upgrade.

3Dmark, i'm not even going to try.

I'm going to buy age of conan and see what happens;)

------------------------------ Folding@HOME Team: 163116
http://pid.us.playstation.com//user/L1qu1dat1on.jpg
Lapped CPU
http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/501789.png
Reply to L1qu1d

Currently installing Crysis now, and I will bench it shortly, unfortuantely I will be using XP 32 bit, so the Very High settings will be disabled. I will run it on High at 1920x1200, would you please do the same. (run it on high) and let me know what you get.

------------------------------ Core i7 920 @ 4.0Ghz - Asus P6T - 12GB Corsair XMS 3 - 2X ATI 58701GB Crossfire- Zalman 850W - X-FI Fatality Gamer Pro - Xigmatek Thor's Hammer - Raptor X 150 - WD Black 1TB OCZ Vertex Turbo 120 GB SSD - Cosmos S Case w/side window + 8X 120mm fans
Reply to annisman
- 0 +

yeah sure. I have windows Vista though, and its Direct X10 enabled, which will stress it more, it will be hard to compare:S

EDIT: Can you just run the benchmarks at 1280x1024 so I don't need to lug the computer int he living lol?? if not I'll do it:P

use this program : http://downloads.guru3d.com/download.php?det=1791

EDIT 2 :

http://i189.photobucket.com/albums/z296/L1qu1d2007/Benchmarks-2.jpg

http://i189.photobucket.com/albums/z296/L1qu1d2007/gpuz.jpg

http://i189.photobucket.com/albums/z296/L1qu1d2007/temp.jpg


Message edited by L1qu1d on 05-26-2008 at 07:36:34 AM
------------------------------ Folding@HOME Team: 163116
http://pid.us.playstation.com//user/L1qu1dat1on.jpg
Lapped CPU
http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/501789.png
Reply to L1qu1d

actually the driver update from 174.74 to 175.12 did help since there were artifacting issues with rainbow six vegas 2 unless u go back to forceware 173.67

Reply to darthvaderkenneth
- 0 +

Well my averages for 1920x1200 was 30.033 VeryHigh Settings:)

------------------------------ Folding@HOME Team: 163116
http://pid.us.playstation.com//user/L1qu1dat1on.jpg
Lapped CPU
http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/501789.png
Reply to L1qu1d

annisman wrote :

Currently installing Crysis now, and I will bench it shortly, unfortuantely I will be using XP 32 bit, so the Very High settings will be disabled. I will run it on High at 1920x1200, would you please do the same. (run it on high) and let me know what you get.



You should try the Very High hack for DX9, it's ridiculously easy to do. Not exactly DX10, but enables a lot of the features that were supposedly DX10 exclusive.

Reply to scooterlibby
- 0 +

Here is what happens when you put the shader to low :)

Low

http://i189.photobucket.com/albums/z296/L1qu1d2007/Crysis2008-05-2611-36-55-56.jpg

High

http://i189.photobucket.com/albums/z296/L1qu1d2007/Crysis2008-05-2611-38-25-74.jpg

Low

http://i189.photobucket.com/albums/z296/L1qu1d2007/Crysis2008-05-2611-36-43-57.jpg

High

http://i189.photobucket.com/albums/z296/L1qu1d2007/Crysis2008-05-2523-46-00-25.jpg


See look at the low ones, the trees look bland, even the water isn't what it is in high, also look at the rocks and terrain.

------------------------------ Folding@HOME Team: 163116
http://pid.us.playstation.com//user/L1qu1dat1on.jpg
Lapped CPU
http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/501789.png
Reply to L1qu1d

scooterlibby wrote :

You should try the Very High hack for DX9, it's ridiculously easy to do. Not exactly DX10, but enables a lot of the features that were supposedly DX10 exclusive.



Yes, I know about the hack and I used to use it (When I used to run it 1680x1050) But now it seems that 1920* res is too stressful for my hardware. Liquid, I am downloading that tool now and will fiddle with it shortly.

------------------------------ Core i7 920 @ 4.0Ghz - Asus P6T - 12GB Corsair XMS 3 - 2X ATI 58701GB Crossfire- Zalman 850W - X-FI Fatality Gamer Pro - Xigmatek Thor's Hammer - Raptor X 150 - WD Black 1TB OCZ Vertex Turbo 120 GB SSD - Cosmos S Case w/side window + 8X 120mm fans
Reply to annisman
- 0 +

Very High:

http://i189.photobucket.com/albums/z296/L1qu1d2007/VeryhighTest1920.jpg

Very High (Low shaders):

http://i189.photobucket.com/albums/z296/L1qu1d2007/VeryhighTest1920lowsh.jpg

------------------------------ Folding@HOME Team: 163116
http://pid.us.playstation.com//user/L1qu1dat1on.jpg
Lapped CPU
http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/501789.png
Reply to L1qu1d

Nice work.

Lust for :lol: s:
http://www.usatoday.com/money/indu [...] sing_N.htm
Note what they said for Crysis.

Quote :

Take a video-game-focused desktop designed by Gateway that sells for $1,099 instead of the $2,000 or more that they usually cost. Gateway lowered its price by eliminating the next-generation Blu-ray DVD drive found in most high-end PCs. And it put in an above-average processor instead of the top-of-the-line one typical of gaming computers. To make up for that, Gateway spent big on a high-end graphics chip that can crunch fast-moving video.

The result is an affordable computer great for playing the game Crysis. But it is a poor investment for someone who wants to watch a high-definition movie or create elaborate spreadsheets, which require a lot of processing power.

"It gets complicated, I'm afraid," says Nick Knupffer, a spokesman for chipmaker Intel.

------------------------------ http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2617/3815217176_0a5be7955d_o.gif
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3553/3818083596_1a772f7162_o.gif
Reply to Shadow703793
- 0 +

interesting... try looking up the triple c pack on google... makes the game look better (in my opinon) and increases framerates...

i like it, maybe you will too

Reply to thogrom
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > 9800 GX2 Performance Gain With new Drivers
Go to:

There are 1183 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them