That's good to know man, do me a favor, tell me what drivers you switched from. Also, (no offense) but, why are you gaming in 1280x1024 w/ a GX2 ? Or is that just for playing Crysis. Anyways, I will do some of my own benchmarks for Crysis at 1920x1200 and post them here. What settings are you using ? AA or AF ? Ultra High ? High ? Cracked Ultra High ? Thanks man.
------------------------------Core i7 920 @ 4.0Ghz - Asus P6T - 12GB Corsair XMS 3 - 2X ATI 58701GB Crossfire- Zalman 850W - X-FI Fatality Gamer Pro - Xigmatek Thor's Hammer - Raptor X 150 - WD Black 1TB OCZ Vertex Turbo 120 GB SSD - Cosmos S Case w/side window + 8X 120mm fans
Reply to annisman
Yes, get a new monitor and play at a higher resolution. You might be CPU limited like I am at 1280 x 1024 (still have a 17" CRT -- saving up for a 24" LCD). Both the 9800gx2 and 3870x2 cry out for 24" LCD resolutions to get the best framerates.
I really hope Huang decides to innovate and supports the next Nvidia dual GPU card on one PCB, and both Nvidia and ATI need to go to shared memory for the CPU, because both the 9800gx2 and 3870x2 are somewhat hampered by only 512 megs of RAM per GPU.
We'll probably see dual core discrete GPU's alongside quad core CPU's with one GPU core within a few years. The dual GPU cards are a step in the right direction, but Nvidia needs to get their thermals and power usage down a bit. The days of monster cards from any company are soon to be past.
------------------------------Phenom 8750, ASUS M3A78T
4 gigs Kingston DDR2 800 two 1T SAMSUNG HD103UI
Sapphire 4870x2, Sony BDU-X10S BD-ROM
Antec Neo 650 PSU Antec Nine Hundred, Acer H213H 1080p LCD
Reply to yipsl
I also saw a insignificant boost in Crysis with the new drivers and my two 9800GTX's running with XP Pro 32bit. I have some of the settings set at Very High with the DX9 hack (shaders, physics, objects) and get around 50 FPS at the level you are talking about (1920x1200 no less).
I think ET:QW did not like the new drivers for me though. Had to reinstall and tweak the hell out of that game's cvars to get close to my old performance.
I think ET:QW did not like the new drivers for me though. Had to reinstall and tweak the hell out of that game's cvars to get close to my old performance.
Which is also a reason I think I'm ditching the SLI setup and replacing it with one GTX280.
Currently installing Crysis now, and I will bench it shortly, unfortuantely I will be using XP 32 bit, so the Very High settings will be disabled. I will run it on High at 1920x1200, would you please do the same. (run it on high) and let me know what you get.
actually the driver update from 174.74 to 175.12 did help since there were artifacting issues with rainbow six vegas 2 unless u go back to forceware 173.67
Currently installing Crysis now, and I will bench it shortly, unfortuantely I will be using XP 32 bit, so the Very High settings will be disabled. I will run it on High at 1920x1200, would you please do the same. (run it on high) and let me know what you get.
You should try the Very High hack for DX9, it's ridiculously easy to do. Not exactly DX10, but enables a lot of the features that were supposedly DX10 exclusive.
You should try the Very High hack for DX9, it's ridiculously easy to do. Not exactly DX10, but enables a lot of the features that were supposedly DX10 exclusive.
Yes, I know about the hack and I used to use it (When I used to run it 1680x1050) But now it seems that 1920* res is too stressful for my hardware. Liquid, I am downloading that tool now and will fiddle with it shortly.
------------------------------Core i7 920 @ 4.0Ghz - Asus P6T - 12GB Corsair XMS 3 - 2X ATI 58701GB Crossfire- Zalman 850W - X-FI Fatality Gamer Pro - Xigmatek Thor's Hammer - Raptor X 150 - WD Black 1TB OCZ Vertex Turbo 120 GB SSD - Cosmos S Case w/side window + 8X 120mm fans
Reply to annisman
Take a video-game-focused desktop designed by Gateway that sells for $1,099 instead of the $2,000 or more that they usually cost. Gateway lowered its price by eliminating the next-generation Blu-ray DVD drive found in most high-end PCs. And it put in an above-average processor instead of the top-of-the-line one typical of gaming computers. To make up for that, Gateway spent big on a high-end graphics chip that can crunch fast-moving video.
The result is an affordable computer great for playing the game Crysis. But it is a poor investment for someone who wants to watch a high-definition movie or create elaborate spreadsheets, which require a lot of processing power.
"It gets complicated, I'm afraid," says Nick Knupffer, a spokesman for chipmaker Intel.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.