Tom's Hardware > Forum > Storage > Hard Disks > Hard Disks preformace

Hard Disks preformace

Forum Storage : Hard Disks - Hard Disks preformace

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

i wanna know whats the diffrents between a hard disk with a 32 cache and 16 cache.

i hear people always talking about the rpm for speed, but not much talking about the cache of the hard disk.

so does the cache have anything to do with the hard disk preformance?

edit:
also, there is another thing i wanna ask about monitors

what is a contrast ratio? and how does that effect the quality of the image.

if u have benchmarks or usefull links, please link me or if you could explain in your own words would be better.

thanks in advance.


Message edited by surda on 08-18-2009 at 05:29:39 PM
Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

The size of the cache does affect the performance of a hard disk - larger caches tend to speed up certain types of operations. A lot of uses of hard disks are sequential access - that is, the next chunk of info you want is just the next portion of the same file you just used. So a hard disk, given a request for data from a file, will actually copy a big bunch of that file into its cache, hoping that your next request will be ready in the cache and can be given to you very quickly. But if you're leaping all over the disk with random access requests the cache helps very little. For heavy random-access use, disk speed in rpm is more important because it shortens the delay in finding the target data.

A 32 MB cache is better than 16 MB because it can copy more data at once and use it to fulfill more sequential requests before having to copy from the actual disk again. In practice, however, the performance of those two cache systems does not differ a lot - just enough that very heavy disk users like server systems may find it important.

Contrast Ratio in Monitors is the ratio of the brightness of a white area vs a black area. Black is never totally without light, and white is never completely white. A larger Contrast Ratio simply means the range of brightest to darkest areas is larger, and makes some things easier to see.

Reply to Paperdoc

thank for your help man

one more thing, in Asus Monitor it says 1000:1 (ASCR 12000 : 1)

here is the link , http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6824236051

what does that mean? that its 1000:1 in VGA mode and 12000:1 in DVI or something els?

Reply to surda

You can't trust anything monitor manufacturers list in their specs like contrast ratio since they all measure them differently. Find an independent service that rates them.

Reply to rockford

The ASCR thing appears to be ASUS' own version of some measure of Contrast Ratio, and I'd tend to ignore it. Rockford has a point - sometimes comparing spec's is best done within one manufacturer's product line only. If ASUS and Sony and Dell don't all agree exactly on how to measure Contrast Ratio, you can't compare their numerical specs.

Reply to Paperdoc

ASCR is probably dynamic contrast ratio, while 1000:1 is static. Static matters far more, and is the spec you should care about. Note that any monitor advertising higher than about 1500:1 is advertising the dynamic only to falsely boost their numbers.

------------------------------ Asus P6T deluxe
i7 965 @ 4.2GHz (200*21), 1.384V
12GB Corsair Dominator DDR3-1600 CAS 7
Reply to cjl
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Storage > Hard Disks > Hard Disks preformace
Go to:

There are 557 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them