Tom's Hardware > Forum > Storage > Hard Disks > Someone critique these cheap SSD results

Someone critique these cheap SSD results

Forum Storage : Hard Disks - Someone critique these cheap SSD results

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

CJ.. Get in here. :)

Whats the good and whats the bad?

--------------------------------------------------
CrystalDiskMark 2.2 (C) 2007-2008 hiyohiyo
Crystal Dew World : http://crystalmark.info/
--------------------------------------------------

Sequential Read : 126.468 MB/s
Sequential Write : 81.462 MB/s
Random Read 512KB : 120.186 MB/s
Random Write 512KB : 39.647 MB/s
Random Read 4KB : 14.939 MB/s
Random Write 4KB : 1.911 MB/s

Test Size : 100 MB
Date : 2009/08/19 10:28:08

------------------------------ Core I7 920 D0 @ 4.2Ghz
MSI X58 Pro-E
32GB SSD, WD Blacks In R0
Sapphire HD 5870's In XFire
Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

My SSD which I bought for $240 3 months ago.... (Pisses me off because now you can get a 120GB SSD @ 250 MB/s for $330)

Fresh out of the box:

http://i361.photobucket.com/albums/oo57/RayBob328/HDTune_Benchmark_OCZ-VERTEX_v110.png

2.5 months later:

http://i361.photobucket.com/albums/oo57/RayBob328/HDTune_Benchmark_OCZ-VERTEX_v110-2.png


Message edited by raybob95 on 08-19-2009 at 08:23:51 PM
Reply to raybob95
- 0 +

Quote :

Random Write 4KB : 1.911 MB/s


It's stutter-free. And you said it's cheap. $/GB?
Looks good. I would've preferred at least 6MB/s which is what the OCZ Vertex with newest firmware are doing now. While Intel X25-M are doing over 20MB/s!

I don't read into sequential read/write speed for SSD because they're not useful to my usage, which is typical desktop usage pattern. PCMark Vantage's HDD tests output a comparable data for those tasks.
For manipulating multi-GB files I have my 4x1TB hardware RAID5 array providing me with >380MB/s of sequential read/write to do that instead.

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by wuzy on 08-20-2009 at 01:30:20 AM
------------------------------ GTL Ref Tweaking Guide - PM for detail
Brand is for the weak-minded, only product matters.
Resilient to marketing.
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2520/3850950213_aea6bbbcfe_o.jpg
Reply to wuzy

wuzy wrote :

Quote :

Random Write 4KB : 1.911 MB/s


It's stutter-free. And you said it's cheap. $/GB?
Looks good. I would've preferred at least 6MB/s which is what the OCZ Vertex with newest firmware are doing now. While Intel X25-M are doing over 20MB/s!

I don't read into sequential read/write speed for SSD because they're not useful to my usage, which is typical desktop usage pattern. PCMark Vantage's HDD tests output a comparable data for those tasks.
For manipulating multi-GB files I have my 4x1TB hardware RAID5 array providing me with >380MB/s of sequential read/write to do that instead.




It's a 32GB Patriot SSD i picked up at fry's for 99.99

http://www.patriotmemory.com/products/specs/32GB%20SSD_300px.jpg

------------------------------ Core I7 920 D0 @ 4.2Ghz
MSI X58 Pro-E
32GB SSD, WD Blacks In R0
Sapphire HD 5870's In XFire
Reply to PsychoSaysDie
- 0 +

Ouch, that's $3.125/GB. 128-64GB Indilinx controller based SSD are below $2.4 now.
OCZ Agility with slightly lower binned MLC than Vertex can be found for $2.1/GB oftenly.

------------------------------ GTL Ref Tweaking Guide - PM for detail
Brand is for the weak-minded, only product matters.
Resilient to marketing.
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2520/3850950213_aea6bbbcfe_o.jpg
Reply to wuzy

wuzy wrote :

Ouch, that's $3.125/GB. 128-64GB Indilinx controller based SSD are below $2.4 now.
OCZ Agility with slightly lower binned MLC than Vertex can be found for $2.1/GB oftenly.



I needed something cheap for the OS and i absolutley love this drive so i picked it up. I'm waiting on the new intel G2's to upgrade too. :)

------------------------------ Core I7 920 D0 @ 4.2Ghz
MSI X58 Pro-E
32GB SSD, WD Blacks In R0
Sapphire HD 5870's In XFire
Reply to PsychoSaysDie
- 0 +

Not bad on the whole, though the random writes are abysmal.

 

Here are results for my Velociraptor array:
Seq read: 210.2
Seq write: 190.7
Rand read 512k: 47.62
Rand write 512k: 73.75
Rand read 4k: 1.138
Rand write 4k: 6.413

 

Note that I beat you on every random write test. That's because the cheaper SSDs really have a problem with random writes, as I've said before. The random reads on the SSD are great though.


Message edited by cjl on 08-20-2009 at 02:37:16 AM
------------------------------ Asus P6T deluxe
i7 965 @ 4.2GHz (200*21), 1.384V
12GB Corsair Dominator DDR3-1600 CAS 7
Reply to cjl
- 0 +

I know this is a slightly old thread, but I just got my X25-M G2, so here are some results for that one:

Seq. read: 265.3
Seq write: 87.03
512k rand read: 212.1
512k rand write: 86.2
4k rand read: 22.04
4k rand write: 53.20

The random writes on this thing are phenomenal :D

------------------------------ Asus P6T deluxe
i7 965 @ 4.2GHz (200*21), 1.384V
12GB Corsair Dominator DDR3-1600 CAS 7
Reply to cjl

I've been posting these everywhere - but i guess some people didn't see 'em yet. It shows key differences between SSD controllers regarding random write:

http://images.anandtech.com/graphs/intelx25mg2perfpreview_072209165207/19508.png

This clearly shows why Intel is so much praised; and why they have no real competition regarding performance.

------------------------------ ...man will occasionally stumble over the truth, but usually manages to pick himself up, walk over or around it, and carry on.
Reply to sub mesa
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Storage > Hard Disks > Someone critique these cheap SSD results
Go to:

There are 1292 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them