Best CPU for this RAM

eckosof

Distinguished
May 3, 2007
86
0
18,630
well im building maching around that memory i linked to and my 8800gts. what i doing, GAMING. what im looking for, mobo including atleast 1 pci-e 16x ver 2.x, atleast 4 sata connectors, memory standard alteast what i linked. ive narrowed down my selections for procs, here they are,

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300 Yorkfield 2.5GHz 6MB L2 Cache LGA 775 95W Quad-Core Processor
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819115043

and

Intel Core 2 Duo E7200 Wolfdale 2.53GHz 3MB L2 Cache LGA 775 65W Dual-Core Processor
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819115052

My multitasking usually looks like this, Skype, winamp, Firefox, mirc, pigden, utorrent, Tcpview, and 2-3 more programs i cannot name.

 

liljone

Distinguished
May 11, 2008
183
0
18,680
For gaming go with a dual core for now. But if you are not planing on a CPU upgrade for a long time then go with the quad because the future of gaming will use quad. (e.g. Crysis)
 

eckosof

Distinguished
May 3, 2007
86
0
18,630
yea i dont plan to upgrade for atleast 2 years. atleast the proc and mobo, gfx card will probably need it within a year. is my selection for a quad a good one?
 

shadowthor

Distinguished
Jun 2, 2008
1,128
0
19,280
If you plan to overclock, the Q9300 might be more difficult to overclock as it is handicapped with a lower multiplier not to mention it has half the L2 cache of the Q9450.
 

eckosof

Distinguished
May 3, 2007
86
0
18,630
just need to make sure its 45nm capable right? whats max fsb i should be looking for on mobo if i get the quad core i linked, 1600/1333MHz?
 

eckosof

Distinguished
May 3, 2007
86
0
18,630
seems to have everything one would want, but i heard from multiple sources asus is still having issues with 64-bit vista....true?
 

zipz0p

Distinguished
Jun 24, 2008
350
0
18,790
That's my memory <3 According to G.Skill, it's where speed is! (it used to say "Where speed is?!" on their website, but I think the rhetorical question nature of that exclamation was lost, so they dropped the question mark later).
 

zipz0p

Distinguished
Jun 24, 2008
350
0
18,790
I like the memory. I haven't really pushed it at all, but I'm just starting to get into the memory tuning on my computer. It's been completely stable so far.

I don't think that the CrossfireX or SLi support means anything at all - it just seems like a gimmick.

Great price, by the way. Pair it with any 45nm CPU and you'll be golden.
 

eckosof

Distinguished
May 3, 2007
86
0
18,630
yea im really starting to consider the Q9300 quad. i am bottlenecking my 8800gts soo much with my single core and pci-e 16x v1.x
 

rgsaunders

Distinguished
Jul 10, 2007
401
0
18,780


Thats correct, no SLI. Only nVidia chipsets do SLI, however, unless you want to play russian roulette with your data integrity, nVidia chipsets are a real crapshoot. Most of the recent ones come with a host of problems, SLI is over hyped.
 

eckosof

Distinguished
May 3, 2007
86
0
18,630
yea i will probably go back to ati for next card, just replaced my x800xl for a 880gts G92 512. so maybe the crossfire will come in handy.
 

halcyon

Splendid
While an OC'd to the max dual beats a quad in today's games, one would be inclined to think for general use and gaming a mid-range quad would be the better investment (Q6600/Q9450). Not only can you overclock it, game with it, but you can also multi-task smoother than you can with a dual.

Now, if you have another rig that is your general use machine and you want to rape your CPU via overclock for 2-3 more FPS then get that dual and bend her to your will.
 

eckosof

Distinguished
May 3, 2007
86
0
18,630


crysis 2 is what i meant. and i cant prove it to you cause im under nda.