Tom's Hardware Forums » CPU & Components » CPUs » Crap! Q6600 for $199
 

Crap! Q6600 for $199




Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : Crap! Q6600 for $199
 
Attempting to learn.
Profile: journeyman
More Information

Now I've got yet another decision to make, get a quad core, or stick with the E8400?

 


PS: :D

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by crosshares on 06-27-2008 at 04:28:19 AM
Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

Profile: Forum Veteran
More Information

crosshares wrote :

Now I've got yet another decision to make, get a quad core, or stick with the E8400?

 


PS: :D


Get quad. And it was $189.99 on newegg around 2 weeks ago. They put the price back up because it got more popular meanwhile.


---------------
Q6600@3.6ghz, GA-EX38-DS4 X38 chipset motherboard, 8gb 800mhz ddr2 4-3-3-12, 8800GTS(g92)@780mhz, 1TB 7200rpm 32mb cache hdd, 850watt 12v rails=4x20amp powersupply
Attempting to learn.
Profile: journeyman
More Information

Hell you should see the E8400, the price keeps jumping around every week! :pt1cable:

Yeah, I think I'll go for the Quad, how do I make sure I get the one with G0 stepping though?

Profile: Forum Veteran
More Information

crosshares wrote :

Hell you should see the E8400, the price keeps jumping around every week! :pt1cable:

 

Yeah, I think I'll go for the Quad, how do I make sure I get the one with G0 stepping though?


Although you can't know for sure, it's almost impossible to find new b3 now. Those things are out of production. As fast as newegg's stocks get cleared, it should be all g0.


---------------
Q6600@3.6ghz, GA-EX38-DS4 X38 chipset motherboard, 8gb 800mhz ddr2 4-3-3-12, 8800GTS(g92)@780mhz, 1TB 7200rpm 32mb cache hdd, 850watt 12v rails=4x20amp powersupply
Attempting to learn.
Profile: journeyman
More Information

1 thing though, how much of a performance hit are we talking by going for Q6600 over E8400? Because now that I can get a quad for crazy cheap, I though, why not? I'll take a small performance hit. :whistle:

Profile: journeyman
More Information

atm its performance is based on application games run better on faster dual core compilers and rendering works better on quad nothing wrong with a E8400 if your gaming in fact i would stick with it for now

Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information

I would go with the quad seeing it at that price, plus you can overclock it to match the E8400 clock speed so, it won't be much of a performance hit.

Profile: journeyman
More Information

as far as Upgrade goes A Q6600 G0 is behind the E8400 so you would be looking at spending money on a Q9300

Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information

crosshares wrote :

1 thing though, how much of a performance hit are we talking by going for Q6600 over E8400? Because now that I can get a quad for crazy cheap, I though, why not? I'll take a small performance hit. :whistle:




None as soon as you bump the FSB to 333Mhz.
The Q6600 will easily run at the same 3.0Ghz as the E8400, at stock voltages even.


---------------
If the automobile had followed the same development cycle as the computer, a Rolls-Royce today would cost $100, get a million miles to the gallon, and explode once a year, killing everyone inside.
PSA
LVL: ????
Profile: old hand
More Information

Q6600 FTW! Get it over the E8400.

Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information

pcgamer12 wrote :

Q6600 FTW! Get it over the E8400.




Now I know it...
You are just following me around, aren't you :kaola:


---------------
If the automobile had followed the same development cycle as the computer, a Rolls-Royce today would cost $100, get a million miles to the gallon, and explode once a year, killing everyone inside.
PSA
cjl
Rocket Scientist
Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information

The E8400 will OC quite well too, and I wouldn't at all be surprised to see 3.6+ out of it, but for general use and upcoming games, it still wouldn't match a Q6600 in most cases. Older games will run faster on the E8400, but older games will also tend to run fast enough on either, and the ones that run slow enough to actually notice a difference tend to prefer the quad.

LVL: ????
Profile: old hand
More Information

Yup! That's me, a follower, not a leader. Personally, a quad core even clocked slower makes more sense to me.

 

Logic: You can add speed, but not cores. Overclocking adds speed, but what adds cores? THAT IS ZEH QUESTIOWN.


Message edited by pcgamer12 on 06-27-2008 at 07:26:01 AM
Profile: journeyman
More Information

Have your games run on cores 2 and 3, have everything else on cores 0 and 1.

Also, with a little extra spent on cooling you can get that bad boy to 3.4 and beyond.

Also, don't listen tho those vid losers when overclocking. If you have a good quality PSU, and motherboard with very stable power you can give a Q6600 up to ~1.5v. Just make sure you have the cooling and the system.

Profile: addict
More Information

Ill take your e8400 from you ....
:)
really lol ill buy it.


---------------
Gigabyte GA-P35-DS3L*Intel E2180 OC 3.00Ghz Lapped*PowerColor ATI 3850 256MB*Patriot 2x1GB DDR2 800*Cooler Master CM690*Western Digital 250 GB*Silverstone Strider 600 Watt Modular PSU*Samsung Lightscribe Drive*CoolerMaster Geminni II Lapped Mirror Finish
LVL: ????
Profile: old hand
More Information

I wish I bought a quad, that with AC Freezer 7 Pro, OC to 3.2 Ghz.


Message edited by pcgamer12 on 06-27-2008 at 08:23:31 AM
Profile: stranger
More Information
n°1832861
06-27-2008 at 08:49:58 AM
Hide