shibbiness

Distinguished
Jun 7, 2008
4
0
18,510
Well Title says it all.

Im limited since i have a budget, but which card should i go with. The 9600GSO, :
http://canadacomputers.com/index.php?do=ShowProduct&cmd=pd&pid=018588&cid=999.243.390

or the HD3850 512mb:
http://canadacomputers.com/index.php?do=ShowProduct&cmd=pd&pid=016635&cid=999.243.272

Assuming im probably going to get the MSI k9a2 CF-F. Mind you im not considering going crossfire anytime soon so that shouldnt be a factor when you guys are deciding.

All opinions welcomed,

Thanks.

-Shibbz
 

pauldh

Illustrious
If it's for pure gaming, more often than not the 9600GS will outperform the HD3850. Considering it's also cheaper, the 960GS gets my vote. Both close and nice cards though, so it depends on the games you play.

 

shibbiness

Distinguished
Jun 7, 2008
4
0
18,510
i play CS:S, sometimes crysis (barely), WC3, COD4. and some other games soon. Thanks for the quick replies.

Bump for more opinions
 

macer1

Distinguished
Mar 6, 2006
424
0
18,810
You need to look at benckmarks to decide which is better... this will give you a clearer picture.

http://www.neoseeker.com/Articles/ [...] so/10.html


So yeah, 9600 wins. Its cheaper too. Its a no brainer.


that benchmark is WAY off. the reference card was a 9600gso with 768mb memory " 8800 GTS, 768 MB same thing"



my vote goes to the 9600 with the 3850 in a VERY close second.
 

mihirkula

Distinguished
Nov 27, 2007
964
0
18,980
dang.. i missed the memory part.... I'm not aware of any benchmark or review of the 384mb one... and i couldn't find any either

anyhow if i'd heard right 9600GSO performs very closely to 8800GS ... and 8800GS beats Radeon 3850. But then i'm hoping someone could post benchies here just for confirmation.
 

pauldh

Illustrious

marvelous211

Distinguished
Aug 15, 2006
1,153
0
19,280
I say they are pretty much even but the 8800gs/9600gso does pull more frames than 3850 usually. 3870 would be a better match but I'd rather have 3870 if I had a choice.

9600gt is good if you like AA but I think it lose out to GSO in most games without AA especially when the GSO and 9600gt is overclocked.
 

marvelous211

Distinguished
Aug 15, 2006
1,153
0
19,280


Quite the contrary. The 768mb card doesn't do anything in lower resolutions not that 9600gso or 9600gt can play crysis @ 1920x1200 or would you want to turn on 4xAA @ 1280x1024 when it's not fast enough.

Crysis @ high uses about 380mb of vram @ 1600x1200. A 384mb GSO can handle that resolution quite easily.

I would also like to point out that Palit 9600gt sonic is actually a factory overclocked card @ 700/1750/2000. Neoseeker supposed got their 9600gt 760/1912/2168 while they got the GSO from 600/1500/1800 to 742/1858/1954. 9600gso got bigger overclock when you compare from the reference point and how that overclock is going to change some of the outcome of the benchmarks from a overclocked performance point of view.