Ad
News

Alienware announces desktop PC with Intel's latest quad-core processor

Published on January 11, 2007

Alienware said it "will" launch Intel's second quad-core desktop processor, the 2.4 GHz Core 2 Quad Q6600, on its Area-51 7500 desktop system. Read more

Intel To Update Desktop CPU Lines In Q3

Published on May 20, 2008

More here at Read more

CES 2007: Intel rolls out new quad-core processor Core 2 Quad Q6600

Published on January 08, 2007

Intel is enjoying its lead in the current microprocessor market and today announced more CPUs with four cores. There are three new quad-cores altogether, one desktop processor and two chips for entry-level servers. Read more

Intel's Q8300; May be Last Quad Core

Published on December 02, 2008

Following suit with our Intel road map back in September of this year, Intel has has launched the last Quad-Core that consumers may see for the next while, if more are to come at all – The Q8300. Read more

Latest Reviews & Articles

SSDs Replacing HDDs Soon? Not A Chance

Published on December 29, 2008

Some say 2010 and even 2009 will be the year of SSDs. We think not. Read more

System Builder Marathon: $625 Gaming PC

Published on December 29, 2008

Unsurprisingly, hardware prices have dropped since our System Builder Marathon last month, which means we have access to more processing power at our same $625 entry-level price point for gamers. Come check out the configuration Paul put together! Read more

Tom's Overdrive Competition: Finals Recap

Published on December 25, 2008

With the Overdrive overclocking competition two weeks behind us and Team USA victorious, we wanted to check in with a quick recap of our final contest held in Paris, France. Read more

Roundup: Six Core 2 Motherboards Under $100

Published on December 23, 2008

As Intel’s Core i7 architecture starts moving down from the high-end, value seekers can build high-performance LGA775 systems cheaply. Low-cost motherboards compete for the value crown with added features, performance, and overclocking capabilities. Read more

  Tom's Hardware Forums » CPU & Components » CPUs » Q6600 or Q9550?
 

Q6600 or Q9550?




Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : Q6600 or Q9550?
 
Profile: stranger
More Information

Should I buy a Q6600 now or wait for the Q3 price drop on the Q9550? Also,any estimate on what date the price drops will occur?
Thanks!

Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

Profile: member
More Information

Do not do either. A Q9550 seems like a horrible deal. Buy a Q9450 and overclock it to the speed of a Q9550 or beyond.

Whether or not you want to wait for a price drop is your call. I am doing the same thing. Right now I am running an E6600 and just waiting for that coveted price drop on the Q9450.

If you are desperate or cannot wait any longer I would buy the Q9450 now over the Q6600. They seem like good processors. They overclock well and are 45nm. What that means in a practical sense I am not sure, but I do know they have an extra megabyte of L2 cache per core compared to the Q6600.

A review comparing the Q6600 to the Q9450 among other processors:

www.overclockersclub.com/reviews/intel_q9450

Good Luck,

William


Message edited by WilliamLEJA on 06-28-2008 at 08:41:29 AM

---------------
-Q9450 @ 3.2Ghz
-DFI Lanparty LT X48-T2R
-8GB Mushkin @ 1000 Mhz
-ATI 4870
I'm proud of myself,because i'm from IRAN
Profile: Forum Veteran
More Information

All Q6600,Q9450,Q9550 are good CPUs and OC well, so i say go for the cheapest one and OC


---------------
Q6600@3.4,SAPPHIRE HD 4870X2,OCZ 4GB DDR2 800 RAM 4-4-4-15,ASUS MAXIMUS FORMULA X38,SEAGATE 500GB 7200RPM 32MB,TT V1 CPU Cooler,TT ARMOR SILVER ALUMNIUM With 25cm FAN,OCZ MODXSTREAM 900W,LG W2452V 1920x1200
Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information

3rd quarter prices will start dropping for the q9550 and q6600, as well as the q9450.

Profile: stranger
More Information

Thanks for the responses! I wasn't actually considering the Q9450 because I couldn't find anything saying that there would be a price drop.I have only read that it will be phased out and replaced with the Q9400. Also after reading about the considerable price drop on the Q9550 I thought it might be a better option over the Q6600.

Profile: enthusiast
More Information

Microcenter has the Q9450 for $299 on a regular basis. For $100 more I'd say its worth the extra performance clock for clock vs the Q6600. Also probably not worth waiting for the price drop unless you dont desperately need to upgrade right now.


---------------
http://valid.x86-secret.com/cache/banner/377091.png
NZXT Apollo PCP&C Silencer 610 watt
VisionTek 4870x2
Seagate 7200.10 500gb
Some call me ... Tim?
Profile: enthusiast
More Information

My $300 Q9450 from Microcenter's running like a champ at 3.2GHz... I'm sure it could go faster, but I just don't need it to, and I like to keep my temperatures and voltages as low as possible.

What sort of a goal do you have in terms of overclocking?

Now that is just absolutely ludicrous
Profile: addict
More Information

45nm is cheaper to manufacture but they're selling it much higher.

Profile: addict
More Information

yup. q9450 at 3.2 is sure sweet :)

i think this is a comfortable spot in OC-ing...temps are low...performance is high.


---------------
http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/465527.png
Profile: addict
More Information

I'm waiting for the Q9550 and I think it's a much better choice than the Q9450 because of the higher multiplier. (Assuming my mobo will support it because it currently only supports dual core 45nm chips)


---------------
Intel E6400 @3.0GHz 1.35vcore, Zalman CNPS9700, eVGA 8800GTS 640MB, Asus P5N32-E SLI, 4G (2x2G) Mushkin Redline DDR2 8000, Thermaltake Armor, Enermax Modu82+ 625W PSU, BenQ FP241W 24" LCD
Some call me ... Tim?
Profile: enthusiast
More Information

If you're in the waiting game, wait for Nehalem.

Profile: newbie
More Information

What is the advantage of Nehalem and how much will they be retailing for at launch?

I'm proud of myself,because i'm from IRAN
Profile: Forum Veteran
More Information

I never recommend waiting,because if u want to wait, u cant every buy a new thing :)


---------------
Q6600@3.4,SAPPHIRE HD 4870X2,OCZ 4GB DDR2 800 RAM 4-4-4-15,ASUS MAXIMUS FORMULA X38,SEAGATE 500GB 7200RPM 32MB,TT V1 CPU Cooler,TT ARMOR SILVER ALUMNIUM With 25cm FAN,OCZ MODXSTREAM 900W,LG W2452V 1920x1200
Profile: addict
More Information

modtech wrote :

45nm is cheaper to manufacture but they're selling it much higher.

your still paying for the millions in reasearch and building the Fabrication plants

 


---------------
Invented a new file compression... remove all the '0'. They are nothing anyways...
Q6600 O/C to 3.6Ghz wc
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=229261
Profile: newbie
More Information

Maziar wrote :

I never recommend waiting,because if u want to wait, u cant every buy a new thing :)



Completely agree. On the other hand though those additional Ghz that would come with an upgrade begin to look pretty enticing the more you wait. :)

Profile: member
More Information

Unless you absolutely need the upgrade then you should wait.

If your video card is capable of playing the latest games...why upgrade?
If your processor encodes video at a reasonable speed...why upgrade?
If your power supply is 500 watts but powers your system...why upgrade to 1000?

My point is that if you don't need to spend money why spend it? You can spend thousands and thousands of dollars on a system and it will be top of the line. Give it a month and it will be second best in one way or more.

William