Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > How worthwhile is the Core 2 E8600?

How worthwhile is the Core 2 E8600?

Forum CPU & Components : CPUs - How worthwhile is the Core 2 E8600?

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

I just noticed on a component pricing website that 8600 is out.

This beast should be overclockable to 4ghz right out of the box with zero tweaking if you set FSB to 400 - I'd love to hear about overclockers out there pushing it to 5ghz. It's even quite affordable (at least in my country) being $100 cheaper than a Q9450 and half the price of a Q9550. But can it still can't compete with a quad?

I have this impression that it represents the final step of an old technology before Nehalem arrives. I think it marks the end of the Wolfdale line but I could be wrong.

I'm seriously considering buying one and holding onto it for years to come instead of going through all that nasty business of upgrading every damn thing next year all over again. Is anyone else planning on replacing their old Pentium 4's and D's with this sucker? I have a 6750 and I certainly want this frigging thing.

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

Not really, unless you just want to buy the CPU for benchmarking purpose. The future is basically multi-core, and I reckon dual core will be sufficient for maybe another year or two (for intensive applications, such as games).

Of course, if your budget does not allow for a quad core, then E8600 certainly makes sense.

------------------------------ Intel will not take the top spot, or probably the top 3 spot back for the forseeable future. Not even with 32nm and more cores will intel be able to beat Jaguar. - JennyH the AMDiot, Nov 2009
Reply to yomamafor1

It has a new stepping and will probably overclock like hell with that 10x multi. I'm thinking about it carefully. Games still scale far better with MHZ than with cores, especially when using CrossFire/SLI setups. By the time a Quad becomes a 'must' we'll have Sandy Bridge and Bulldozer already. If the next major game release doesn't show any significant (20%+) gains with Quad-Core then I'll go for it.

Reply to dattimr

MrsBytch wrote :

Quote :

Is anyone else planning on replacing their old Pentium 4's and D's with this sucker?




Well problem is, a lot of people that have Pentium4's, Pentium D's or even older C2D's for that matter, cant upgrade to Wolfdale because their boards dont support 45nm. Mine is a good example. The highest I can upgrade is Q6600/6700, which sucks because I dont want either.



If I remember well, ASUS Commando supports Penryn CPUs. It's also based on P965. Too bad they don't release a new BIOS for you.

Reply to dattimr
Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > How worthwhile is the Core 2 E8600?
Go to:

There are 893 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them