I am in the midst of selecting all of the components for my new system but I ran into a bit of a snag. The motherboard that I had originally selected is not in stock locally and rather than buying online I was seeing if I could find a board that may do the job.
and for kicks... NZXT LEXA Blackline ATX Case Red No PS Temp Display Window Front USB & Audio
Now I had originally decided to go with the Asus P5K-C but as I mentioned that is no longer available, chiefly due to the fact that it is an older board. Can anyone suggest a suitable motherboard given the build that would be in the same price range? Im building with about a $1,000 budget.
Oh, and any suggestions to the current build would be appreciated as well.
The 9800 GTX is selling about 210 @ Tigerdirect. And I see that the HD4850 is about the same price. If the HD4850 performs better I may have to seriously consider getting that instead. Ill take a look.
The only reason I settled on 4 x 1GB was because the P5K-C had 4 DDR2 slots and 2 DDR3, so I figured if I was going to upgrade I could have just chucked in a couple DDR3 ram chips. But if I am looking at another board I may very well go with 2 x 2GB.
OK, first of all, avoid the mobos with dual DDR2/DDR3. All you really get is a higher price and lower overclocking ability. I've discovered that too late, with my own GA-P35C-DS3R with dual support.
Stick with something with DDR2 only. By the time DDR3 is worth buying you'd need a Nehalem motherboard anyway, you won't be able to reuse any MB you buy today with a Nehalem CPU.
Between HD 4850 and 9800GTX. They trade blows. I'll stick with 1680x1050 comparisons, since those are the 20" or 22" monitors which most people have these days.
http://www.techspot.com/review/103 [...] page4.html Crysis: 9800GTX wins by 1 fps (33.1 instead of 32)
Devil May Cry 4: HD 4850 wins by 5 fps, but it's irrelevant since monitors can't display 125 fps
Quake Wars: HD 4850 wins by 26 fps, but again it's irrelevant
Supreme Commander: HD 4850 wins 61 fps vs 58 fps, or 54 vs 51 with AA/AF. The monitor can show the difference but you won't notice it.
UT3: the 9800GTX wins by 3 fps, but it's pointless again (131 fps, 128 fps, the monitor won't show that many fps)
World in Conflict: the HD 4850 wins, 34 fps vs 31 fps. You won't notice it, I guess.
I'd say they are identical for all practical purposes. If you want two cards though, you're better of with the ATI card because then you can use a quality motherboard with an Intel chipset and avoid nVidia's SLI chipsets. Also, two ATI cards scale better than two nVidia cards usually, it's a somewhat better mechanism.
Do you like the NZXT Tempest? I'd prefer it to the Lexa because it has better cooling.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.