Tom's Hardware Forums » Graphic & Displays » TV/Video Cards » graphics output questions
 

graphics output questions




Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : graphics output questions
 
Profile: member
More Information

forgive me if this is in the wrong category, but

Here's my question. The woman is out of town for a few days, and I'm feeling like leaving the sufficient 22" lcd monitor behind, and dragging my box to the 42" plasma to play some games. Question being, when I hook up to the plasma, the highest resolution my sys wants to output is 1024x768. That's using a standard vga cable, as I don't have an HDMI cable laying around. Obviously, 1024x768 doesn't look great on the big display...but being a 1080i display, shouldn't it be capable than more than this. Is the prob in the output I'm sending from the computer, or to which input i'm sending it on the television. Not knowing squat about home theater setup, I'd rather not run across town for a cable not knowing whether or not it will make a difference.

btw, the system i'm running is as follows
q6600@3.6ghz
2gb ddr2 pc6400
8800gt oc'd a bit

thanks in advance for any help

Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

Profile: Honorary Poster
More Information

It's the connection. VGA is an analog connection which isn't capable of the bandwidth needed for high resolutions. You could buy a HDMI cable but your local Big Box store is going to seriously overcharge you. I went to Circuit City looking for a cheap HDMI cable and the cheapest one they had was $45, I ended up buying one from Newegg for $15.


---------------
http://i192.photobucket.com/albums/z311/AUsch30/badge_wtp_02_3001.jpg
It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.
Aristotle
Profile: addict
More Information

well you should be capable of better resolutions with that vga cable than just the 1024x768 that you are getting. what is the resolution of the plasma tv?

also maybe in display properites you have it set up so that it stays within some ratios, but it's pretty strange. i've always been able to choose any resolution i want as soon as i'm connected to tv. my 3870 has had little problem connecting to 42" lcd 1366 x 768p resolution via hdmi. one time i had to lower the resolution to the lowest one, cause i didn't see the native resolution of my tv. after i did that, i was able to see more options.


---------------
Phenom 9500 @2.5ghz|MSI K9A2 Platinum|500Gb,750Gb Seagate 7200.11|2Gb OCZ Ram|Diamond HD3870 @850Mhz|CM 690|OCZ 700Watt
Profile: addict
More Information

.


Message edited by godless on 06-17-2008 at 07:02:20 AM

---------------
Phenom 9500 @2.5ghz|MSI K9A2 Platinum|500Gb,750Gb Seagate 7200.11|2Gb OCZ Ram|Diamond HD3870 @850Mhz|CM 690|OCZ 700Watt
Profile: Honorary Poster
More Information

Your video card has a DVI out, does your TV have a DVI in? If not you would need to buy a DVI to HDMI cable like this
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6812186012


---------------
http://i192.photobucket.com/albums/z311/AUsch30/badge_wtp_02_3001.jpg
It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.
Aristotle
Profile: addict
More Information

Same thing happened to me, I tried connecting my PC and my laptop to a 1080p TV with VGA, got that **** 1024x768 resolution. I find it to be odd though, my friend uses a 32" 720p TV as a monitor sometimes for **** and giggles, he connects to it via vga. So, who knows.

LVL: ????
Profile: old hand
More Information

I could get 1080P using VGA on my Xbox 360 before I sold it. Weird, try using control settings and set it like a TV instead and force the resolution and refresh time, make sure they are supported by TV so you don't bust it.


Go to:
 
  Tom's Hardware Forums » Graphic & Displays » TV/Video Cards » graphics output questions

Google Ads
Ad
News

DDR2 output approaching 25 percent of the DRAM market

Published on May 12, 2005

DDR2 output accounted for 23.45 percent of global DRAM output in April, with total DRAM output increasing 1.3 percent sequentially to 516 million 256Mbit-equivalent units, according to figures from DRAMeXchange. Read more

VIA launches integrated K8M890 chipset with DirectX9 support

Published on October 21, 2005

VIA Technologies today announced its VIA K8M890 core logic chipset featuring the new S3 Graphics DeltaChrome Integrated Graphics Processor (IGP) core designed to meet the requirements of the upcoming Microsoft Windows Vista operating system and rising high definition video standards. Read more

Global DRAM output rises 9% in October

Published on November 09, 2005

From DigiTimes Read more

DRAM output growth slows in November, but the worst may be over for DDR2

Published on December 15, 2005

Global DRAM output grew a slight 2.7 percent in November to reach 704 million 256 Mbit equivalent units, representing a 57 percent increase in monthly output from January of this year. Read more

Latest Reviews & Articles

Updated CPU Charts 2008: AMD Versus Intel

Published on October 01, 2008

The processor is the heart of your PC, and our updated charts for Q3 2008 show 54 of them competing in terms of performance. Using our updated suite of benchmarks, compare your favorite AMD and Intel CPUs after reading this introduction. Read more

Stalker: Clear Sky - Is Your System Ready?

Published on September 30, 2008

Thinking about picking up the latest update to Stalker, but not sure if your graphics subsystem can handle it? Hang on as we take you through a performance tour and demonstrate how the game has been prettied up. Read more

Part 4: Avivo HD vs. PureVideo HD

Published on September 29, 2008

The 780G chipset/Radeon HD 3200 and the MCP78S chipset/GeForce 8200 provide the first integrated graphics solutions that can accelerate Blu-ray playback. We dig deep into how well they work with high-quality Blu-ray 1080p video playback. Read more

Four GeForce 9600 GT Cards Compared

Published on September 26, 2008

Manufacturers really love the first Geforce 9. The graphic chip is fast, the cards are inexpensive, and some retailers offer more than ten variations. Read more