Ad
News

Adobe patches Photoshop, Illustrator flaws

Published on February 06, 2006

Web and print publishing software maker Adobe Systems has pushed out security patches to cover a potentially serious code execution flaw in the Adobe Creative Suite 2 platform. Read more

Adobe skips Flash Player 8 for Linux

Published on December 27, 2005

An Adobe developer revealed inhis blog that his company will not offer a Flash Player 8 for Linux. Instead, Adobe, which recently acquired Macromedia, plans to release version 8.5 for the open source operating system. Read more

Adobe ships Photoshop Elements 5.0, Premiere Elements 3.0

Published on September 25, 2006

Adobe Systems Incorporated today announced that the latest installments to the Photoshop Elements and Premiere Elements software have been shipped to retailers nationwide. Read more

Adobe discloses some Apollo details

Published on May 26, 2006

Adobe Systems has begun to dish details of Apollo, a fruit of the company's merger with Macromedia that will allow developers to create run-time applications with Flash and Acrobat that can be used offline without a Web browser. Read more

Latest Reviews & Articles

System Builder Marathon: $2,500 Enthusiast PC

Published on December 31, 2008

We’ve seen how far a moderately priced Core i7 system can take us and now we’re ready to assess the performance advantages of better cooling and a stronger graphics configuration. Will our upgrades be worth the money? Read more

System Builder Marathon: $1,250 Mid-Range PC

Published on December 30, 2008

We see how far $1,250 gets us when building a new Core i7-based system, and how it compares to last month’s similarly priced Core 2 Duo machine. Read more

SSDs Replacing HDDs Soon? Not A Chance

Published on December 29, 2008

Some say 2010 and even 2009 will be the year of SSDs. We think not. Read more

System Builder Marathon: $625 Gaming PC

Published on December 29, 2008

Unsurprisingly, hardware prices have dropped since our System Builder Marathon last month, which means we have access to more processing power at our same $625 entry-level price point for gamers. Come check out the configuration Paul put together! Read more

  Tom's Hardware Forums » CPU & Components » CPUs » Best CPU for Adobe CS3 Collection
 

Best CPU for Adobe CS3 Collection




Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : Best CPU for Adobe CS3 Collection
 
Profile: stranger
More Information

Need some advise on upgrading my CPU and Motherboard. I will be using:

Vista Business x64
Flash
Photoshop
Illustrator
Acrobat
Dreamweaver
MS Office 2007
Some gaming (latest titles)

I'm willing to spend $200-250 on the CPU and another $100-150 on the motherboard. I already have the other components. My goal is to decrease rendering and wait times so I can get my work done faster. I may overclock, but don't want to push too far past stock voltages. Stability and reliability are a priority.

Any suggestions?

Here are my other components for reference: Antec 550W/P180b Case/4GB DDR2-800/HD4850


Message edited by ayrix on 07-10-2008 at 06:40:31 AM
Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

Ancient Poster? I'm not that old... am i?
Profile: Ancient Poster
More Information

Q6600 or Q9450 with any Intel chipset based motherboard and a decent cooler...


---------------
Salvation Army: Umm, general, what do you mean when you use the term "medical genocide"?
Chocolate, one size fits all, "Shipping Container"
I love my crappy BE-2400 and nothing can take that away from me... except maybe a ULV Core 2 Duo...
Profile: Forum Fixture
More Information

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6819115018
The Q6600 quad is cheap, and scales well in Photoship CS3, even at the low stock 2.4ghz. Most people in this forum run it at 3.6ghz.
http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipse [...] i=2963&p=7

 

For motherboard, a cheap p45 should do well.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] rder=PRICE


---------------
Q6600@3.6ghz, GA-EX38-DS4 motherboard, 8gb 800mhz ddr2 4-3-3-12, 8800GTS(g92)@780mhz, 1TB + 1.5TB hdds, 850watt psu
Ancient Poster? I'm not that old... am i?
Profile: Ancient Poster
More Information

^ I think more RAM and a 64 bit OS would do him well... what do you think?

 

Oh and remember to buy a fast scratch disk =)


Message edited by amdfangirl on 07-10-2008 at 02:11:23 AM

---------------
Salvation Army: Umm, general, what do you mean when you use the term "medical genocide"?
Chocolate, one size fits all, "Shipping Container"
I love my crappy BE-2400 and nothing can take that away from me... except maybe a ULV Core 2 Duo...
Profile: stranger
More Information

Thanks for the tips. I was thinking along the same lines. Quad core seems to be the way to go for the apps I'm using.
Quick overclocking question. If I go for the Q6600, is it better run the RAM at 1:1 and lower the cpu multiplier? For example:
400x7.5 = 3.0 GHz vs. 333x9 = 3.0 GHz

I'm guessing most people use 400x9 to get 3.6 GHz. Is that common, or would I need to invest in some higher-end components to hit that clock?

I'm interested in the Q9300 and Q9450 as well, or maybe the Q9550 if the price cuts come as expected.

Profile: addict
More Information

+1 for the e8400 and 6-8Gb of ram

Clockspeed, ram and disk I/O is more important than quad cores in Adobe (excepting Premiere, of course)

Profile: Forum Fixture
More Information

ayrix wrote :

Thanks for the tips. I was thinking along the same lines. Quad core seems to be the way to go for the apps I'm using.
Quick overclocking question. If I go for the Q6600, is it better run the RAM at 1:1 and lower the cpu multiplier? For example:
400x7.5 = 3.0 GHz vs. 333x9 = 3.0 GHz

 

I'm guessing most people use 400x9 to get 3.6 GHz. Is that common, or would I need to invest in some higher-end components to hit that clock?

 

I'm interested in the Q9300 and Q9450 as well, or maybe the Q9550 if the price cuts come as expected.


It's better to keep ratio at 1:1. Yes, 400x9 is most common, that also comes out to 400x2=800mhz ddr2 for ram. It's the typical setup.

 

You would need a good cpu cooler. Here's top 5 performing ones:
http://www.frostytech.com/top5heatsinks.cfm
For reference, this is what I use for q6600:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6835887011
At prime95 small ffts full load, 58C at 3.6ghz, and 69C at 4ghz. Temperature threshold for q6600 is 71C.


---------------
Q6600@3.6ghz, GA-EX38-DS4 motherboard, 8gb 800mhz ddr2 4-3-3-12, 8800GTS(g92)@780mhz, 1TB + 1.5TB hdds, 850watt psu
Ancient Poster? I'm not that old... am i?
Profile: Ancient Poster
More Information

wisecracker wrote :

+1 for the e8400 and 6-8Gb of ram

Clockspeed, ram and disk I/O is more important than quad cores in Adobe (excepting Premiere, of course)



Which is why I recommend a 750GB 7200RPM disk for storage and a fast as possible one for cache... (scratch disk)


---------------
Salvation Army: Umm, general, what do you mean when you use the term "medical genocide"?
Chocolate, one size fits all, "Shipping Container"
I love my crappy BE-2400 and nothing can take that away from me... except maybe a ULV Core 2 Duo...
Profile: addict
More Information

As long as you aren't using premiere pro, you should be golden with overclocking. I have heard overclocking cause major problems with video editing, stability is the most important thing.

Don't Feed the Trolls!
Profile: Ancient Poster
More Information

Fast quad, lots of RAM, + fast hard drive


---------------
- TC
Profile: journeyman
More Information

I have a Q9450 @ 3.4, i couldent ask for anything more.
Im a graphic designer myself, so i have InDesign, Illustrator and Photoshop all open at once, with multiple documents open within each program and i absolutely never have a lockup.
Mines paired with 4gb of ddr2 & 1066 for measure

I had a dual core for a while, it was good but the quad really shines through for design.
Hope it all works out for you.

Ancient Poster? I'm not that old... am i?
Profile: Ancient Poster
More Information

I'm a hobbyist animator/artist and I normally have Photoshop, Illustrator, Flash and Painter all up at once... trust me, a good scratch disk does alot of difference (even when I only have a dual-core Athlon...)


---------------
Salvation Army: Umm, general, what do you mean when you use the term "medical genocide"?
Chocolate, one size fits all, "Shipping Container"
I love my crappy BE-2400 and nothing can take that away from me... except maybe a ULV Core 2 Duo...
Profile: stranger
More Information

The e8400 was my top pick for a while due to the clockspeed, but you guys bring up some great points. I typically work with 4-5 apps at a time and I think I'd really benefit from a quad. Its mostly graphics work and web design, but I'd like to get into 3D animation and video composition in the future.

I've been using a partition on my primary drive as a scratch disk. For about the same price, I could add another 4GB of ram (total of 8 GB) or another hard drive. I'm leaning towards the hard drive. Any thoughts?

@warcry: Thanks for the input. What motherboard are you using with your Q9450?

Profile: Forum Fixture
More Information

ayrix wrote :

The e8400 was my top pick for a while due to the clockspeed, but you guys bring up some great points. I typically work with 4-5 apps at a time and I think I'd really benefit from a quad. Its mostly graphics work and web design, but I'd like to get into 3D animation and video composition in the future.

 

I've been using a partition on my primary drive as a scratch disk. For about the same price, I could add another 4GB of ram (total of 8 GB) or another hard drive. I'm leaning towards the hard drive. Any thoughts?

 

@warcry: Thanks for the input. What motherboard are you using with your Q9450?


It depends. Some 3d animation programs are ram hogs. If it overshoots the 4gb limit and start using page file off hdd, it'll really drag down performance. Aviod it however possible. Try looking up typical ram usage for the programs you use before deciding between ram or hdd.


---------------
Q6600@3.6ghz, GA-EX38-DS4 motherboard, 8gb 800mhz ddr2 4-3-3-12, 8800GTS(g92)@780mhz, 1TB + 1.5TB hdds, 850watt psu
Profile: journeyman
More Information

I have a very cheap motherboard, the only part i skimped on in my setup.
Its an Asus P5K-SE, it only cost me roughly $70 AU, and it can handle up to 3.5ghz from that cpu, although with a more expensive board the q9450 can hit 3.7+

Profile: Ancient Poster