ATI vs. Nvidia.
I prefer Nvidia because they support Linux, I can work with generic ATI drivers if I have to. This card will go into a dual-boot system - Ubuntu/Windows XP Home. The reason for upgrading is primarily to play World of Warcraft and Everquest (the only reason why Windows is on this machine) at reasonable speeds which has not been possible with the on-board Intel graphics.
The Nvidia PCI card has a Core clock of 300MHz, ATI's PCI 1x card is 550MHz.
The Nvidia PCI card has a Memory Clock of 533MHz , ATI's PCI 1x card is 800MHz.
Price - Nvidia PCI card is $45.99 and the ATI PCI 1x is $99.99.
Max resolution for both cards is much higher than anything that will be needed.
So how much does Core clock and Memory clock speeds impact video performance? Is there a clear advantage in using PCI 1x over PCI?
If you're playing games the Ati card is the way to go.
Linux support is spartan but really if the reason you're buying is games, the X1550 is exponentially better from both a far better GPU to a noticably better interface.
And really, Linux support will probably improve over time (either minimally or significantly who knows), whereas the GF6200 will always be weak with no improvement.
------------------------------You need a license to buy a gun, but they'll sell anyone a stamp (or internet account) - REDGREEN. GA to SK HD Freedom: 45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
Reply to TheGreatGrapeApe
What about using a PCI 16x card in the 1x slot? I am going to go pull the case cover off and see if there's enough clearance on the motherboard for that.
It's the $99.99 price tag . . . . if I can get similar performance with a less expensive card that would be my preference.
I think PCIe x1 has about twice the bandwidth of PCI, but at the low end, bandwidth isn't super important.
I put that money toward a new mobo, if thats a standard AXT or micro ATX case
Ah if it were just a matter of the motherboard only . . . . with that purchase I'd end up having to buy a video card as well. Can't see the advantage there but thanks for the reply just the same.
Ah if it were just a matter of the motherboard only . . . . with that purchase I'd end up having to buy a video card as well. Can't see the advantage there but thanks for the reply just the same.
newer OBG will outdo those overpriced and hobbled cards
(Got it right when I hit submit (on board graphics).)
In my experience and in my opinion - I have never had good luck with Intel's on-board graphics and ANY 3D app. Add to that the fact that they do not support OpenGL (which is on of the backbones for KDE), I am not likely to ever use it as a permanent solution unless those practices change in the future.
Besides, I'm just trying to get some life into an older computer, not rebuild the silly thing.
Message edited by Anlace on 06-18-2008 at 09:30:21 PM
Even then they are buggy and only work with some cards, and for the price, might as well buy a new MoBo.
And the bandwidth for PCIe 1X is effectively 4 times as much as PCI (and bi-directional), and the difference is pretty significant. It probably wouldn't matter as much for the GF6200 as the X1550, but it does make a difference.
Here's a quick easy representatio of the bandwidths involved;
Anything above a low end GF8600/HD2600 will be chocked by PCIe 1X, and PCI would turn it into something comparable to the 780G intergrated chipset.
Either get an updated mobo with a solid GF8200/9100 intergrated VPU (since you use Linux and thus intel or AMD IGP is little benefit) or else get the X1550.
Message edited by TheGreatGrapeApe on 06-18-2008 at 09:29:37 PM
------------------------------You need a license to buy a gun, but they'll sell anyone a stamp (or internet account) - REDGREEN. GA to SK HD Freedom: 45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
Reply to TheGreatGrapeApe
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.