I remember reading the tom's article on bandwidth of the 8xxx nvidia cards on different number of lanes, and remember that only the 8800GTX actually lost a bit of performance using a 4x PCI-E 1.0 slot.
Now with the next gen cards, the cards like the 4870X2 and the GTX280 that are designed for PCI-E 2.0 (32x), How do they perform on a PCI-E 1.0 (16x) slot? (non sli of course)
Can tom's do a review on this for us? I'm sure i'm not the only one with a pre PCI-E 2.0 board.
if 4x was too slow for the last gen, I'd say x8 should be the cut off. With all the MB supporting 2.0, 8X runs as fast on these new cards as 16X did on the GTX. We should have some breathing room for a while. (at least until 3.0 in 2010)
Message edited by nvalhalla on 06-18-2008 at 11:18:54 PM
Well from what i read the 3870x2 was really a 1.0 slot which ATI amited was a mistake because it was hungry bandwith. So really it would be worth getting 2.0 if you plain on getting the 4870x2.
Message edited by kelfen on 06-19-2008 at 12:10:31 AM
How can anyone possibly know this... when one of those cards isn't even anything other than speculation.
Tbh I think that the 8x line has probably been reached by the higher end cards. Id be surprised if it wasn't. But then again PCI-E2 doubles the bandwidth, so 8 lanes on PCI-E2 should be ok.
PCI-E1 x16 should be fine too
Message edited by Hatman on 06-19-2008 at 01:29:58 AM
------------------------------Na na na na na na na na HATMAN!
Reply to Hatman
I think 16x 1.0 is plenty. I mean, can your processor and ram really push enough to fill 32x? I doubt mine can, so my 4870 will go in an old fashioned 1.0
yup i thought so too, there is enough already on the bus...
I'm itching for a 4870X2, i really dont want another Nvidia card, i've bought nvidia since geforce 256. But if there are no linux drivers for the 4870x2 then i'll settle with a gtx280
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.