Tom's Hardware > Forum > Storage > Hard Disks > Three hdds config??

Three hdds config??

Forum Storage : Hard Disks - Three hdds config??

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

I have 3 HDDs:
1- WD 40 GB SATA
2- Seagate 500 GB SATA
3- WD 1000 GB SATA
Mobo MSI 790FX
can I config them as RAID and get 1500 GB
and if not,make them run as IDE or ACHI mode??

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

The only thing RAID can do for you is to combine two or all of these into one "drive" through a version called "JBOD" for "Just a Bunch of Drives". RAID0 or RAID1 will limit your 2-disk array to the smaller of the two drives in the array. You could not possibly use these three together to make a RAID5 array of any useful size. And RAID 0+1 , etc, has similar limits. Consider also that using RAID in any form means you MUST have the RAID system working in order to use those drives.

The question arises, why? Using each as separate drives makes more sense to me. You can organize your data any way you like, and having it spread over 2 or 3 drives means trouble on one drive will leave your others safe.

Some people like to have a smaller Partition to contain only the OS, and put all application software and data on other drives. They argue that, if the OS gets corrupted, they can completely re-install it on that small "drive" (Partition) and still have all their other stuff preserved safely. You have that situation already, although I am not sure whether 40 GB is enough to install and run an OS. I think so. And the Partition truly is a completely separate physical drive. Look at this option, and make sure you understand how to install all your application software, My Documents folder, etc. NOT on the C: drive you boot from.

Reply to Paperdoc

Paperdoc wrote :

The only thing RAID can do for you is to combine two or all of these into one "drive" through a version called "JBOD" for "Just a Bunch of Drives". RAID0 or RAID1 will limit your 2-disk array to the smaller of the two drives in the array. You could not possibly use these three together to make a RAID5 array of any useful size. And RAID 0+1 , etc, has similar limits. Consider also that using RAID in any form means you MUST have the RAID system working in order to use those drives.

The question arises, why? Using each as separate drives makes more sense to me. You can organize your data any way you like, and having it spread over 2 or 3 drives means trouble on one drive will leave your others safe.

Some people like to have a smaller Partition to contain only the OS, and put all application software and data on other drives. They argue that, if the OS gets corrupted, they can completely re-install it on that small "drive" (Partition) and still have all their other stuff preserved safely. You have that situation already, although I am not sure whether 40 GB is enough to install and run an OS. I think so. And the Partition truly is a completely separate physical drive. Look at this option, and make sure you understand how to install all your application software, My Documents folder, etc. NOT on the C: drive you boot from.




thanks too much
I will do this
using the WD 40 for OS
500 and 1000 for store my data
but using this hdds as IDE or AHCI is better??

Reply to Ahmad Rady

If you're installing a new copy of Vista or Windows 7 from scratch then use AHCI mode. IDE mode is really just for backward compatibility for older OSes like XP which don't include SATA drivers.

Reply to sminlal

i would ditch the 40GB HDD and keep it around for emergency use
use the 1TB for the OS, programs, and data
keep the 500GB for necessary backups

Reply to mindless728
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Storage > Hard Disks > Three hdds config??
Go to:

There are 440 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them