Articles & News
Graphics & Displays
Tom's IT Pro
Login | Sign Up
The authority on tech
Jul 11, 2008, 10:49 PM
If these are true, it's truly impressive:
Jul 13, 2008
Jul 11, 2008, 10:58 PM
Interesting. Nice find.
I probably will wait until there is more review data on Nehalem, especially with different configurations (mobo, memory, etc), before really taking one site's results as cold stone fact.
But if this is true...it is quite impressive, indeed.
Jul 11, 2008, 11:07 PM
very nice... its faster than my 3.2 ghz core 2 duo awsome
if it is accurate... the scores should improve a little bit more as the platform improves
can't wait to OC these things
Anand does Nehalem!!!
When will Nehalem be on the shelves ...
Favorite Microarchitecture name? Post below!
Possible Nehalem CPU-Z
Can't find your answer ? Ask !
Get the answer
Jul 12, 2008, 7:59 PM
it better overclock, a 4.2GHz QX9650 could give a 3.4ghz nehalem a run?
1.36x 3.4 = 4.6ghz ok i know this is not right but its close - lol!
water cooled qx9770 4.5 would match a 3.4 nehalem
Jul 13, 2008, 4:17 AM
low voltage...extremely high multiplier...45nm technology and a large surface for an extra huge heat sink...
i see a great overclocker on the horizon
Jul 13, 2008, 5:27 AM
Not bad. I am still waiting for some nice real world benchmarks to look at.
Man its like they know we are waiting and are teasing us.
Ask a new question
2.66GHz Nehalem to cost $300?
When to wait for Nehalem? Ditch 775?
AMD 45nm Deneb benchmarks
Interesting Nehalem info
When can one buy a Nehalem based computer?
I7-820qm vs. i7-920 Quad (Nehalem) in a laptop?
Penryn now or wait for nehalem?
Nehalem lonely competitor?
Nehalem is coming =D
No HT For Penryn & Nehalem
What is nehalem?
Hexus.net benchmarks Nehalem
Subscribe to our newsletter
icon arrow stem circle
About Tom's Hardware
Licensing and Reprints
Other Shopsavvy sites
© 2017 Purch All Rights Reserved.