/ Sign-up
Your question

Nehalem benchmarks

  • CPUs
  • Nehalem
Last response: in CPUs
a b à CPUs
July 11, 2008 10:49:33 PM

More about : nehalem benchmarks

July 11, 2008 10:58:42 PM

Interesting. Nice find.

I probably will wait until there is more review data on Nehalem, especially with different configurations (mobo, memory, etc), before really taking one site's results as cold stone fact.

But if this is is quite impressive, indeed.
a b à CPUs
July 11, 2008 11:07:00 PM


very nice... its faster than my 3.2 ghz core 2 duo awsome :D  if it is accurate... the scores should improve a little bit more as the platform improves

can't wait to OC these things
Related resources
July 12, 2008 7:59:07 PM

it better overclock, a 4.2GHz QX9650 could give a 3.4ghz nehalem a run?

1.36x 3.4 = 4.6ghz ok i know this is not right but its close - lol!

water cooled qx9770 4.5 would match a 3.4 nehalem
July 13, 2008 4:17:14 AM

low voltage...extremely high multiplier...45nm technology and a large surface for an extra huge heat sink...

i see a great overclocker on the horizon
a c 213 à CPUs
July 13, 2008 5:27:36 AM

Not bad. I am still waiting for some nice real world benchmarks to look at.

Man its like they know we are waiting and are teasing us.