- ASUS P5E3 Deluxe
- INTEL Core 2 Duo 3.16GHz E8500 [ LGA775 - 6MB - 45nm - 1333MHz]
- 2x DDR3 2GB [2x1GB] DDR1333 (PC3-10666) - CORSAIR DHX [TWIN3X2048-1333C9DHX]
- ASUS Extreme N8800GTS/HTDP ( GeForce 8800GTS 512MB 2xDVI HDTV HDCP )
- SATA150 74GB - 10000 WESTERN DIGITAL RAPTOR (16MB) [WD740ADFD]
- English Windows XP PRO SP2b OEM
Hey there,
this is a quickie (i hope)... title says it all really. For various reasons I can not use all my RAM sticks (4x 1Gb in matched pairs). What is more effective; Using two sticks thus having 2Gb using dual channel, or 3Gb but filling 3 of the 4 RAM slots and not using dual channel?
As an afterthought.... will the latter option cause any H/W damage?
3GB is more beneficial running single channel than 2GB in dual channel I believe and no it's safe.
quote from wiki: "Tom's Hardware found no significant difference between single-channel and dual-channel configurations in synthetic and game benchmarks (using a "modern" system setup).
I had problems using 4 sticks in my mobo as well, I could post with 3 but not the 4th. I was wondering the same thing as you about dual-channel and single, but didn't run any benchmarks to actually find out.
Now, if you have Vista, I'd say the more RAM, the better, but since you're on XP, I guess it depends on what applications you're using.
I finally got my 4 sticks to work by raising the voltage a bit on the RAM and also the northbridge chip. Works great now.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.