An Intel Fanboy gets caught LYING

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VGiv9Dtrc5Q

In the above video, you will see an AMD representative
demo the quad-core Barcelona in relation to a dual core Opteron.

The dual core Opteron is on the left and the quad core
Barcelona is on the right. Dual is 2, Quad is 4 which gives a total of 6 cores.

NOW, in the below video, an Intel fanboy uses the
SAME video above and LIES about the total number of cores:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H1_c-9i5-Ao

He claims the AMD setup has 16 cores.
Again Dual core + Quad core = 6 cores, not 16.
He's off by 10 cores.
Of course we both know he's a liar, right?

Why would anybody feel so threatened by AMD that they have to spread falsehoods?
The truth is perfectly clear.
34 answers Last reply
More about intel fanboy caught lying
  1. Right. We all know that AMD is faster clock for clock than Intel's Core processors, offers higher overall clock speeds and has the most overclocking headroom. AMD FTW!

    Oh, and they make the most money and have the most money in the bank! *snicker*
  2. ^LMAO!!!!!!!

    And your avitar goes with it just great too hehe.
  3. Yep your an AMD fanboi, it is perfectly clear.
  4. Nice flamewar thread. Do you go looking on YouTube for things like this in your spare time?
  5. 9inch? Is that you?
  6. Um...that is a 4 socket system running. Hence, 16 cores. Even the youtube title says "AMD quad core 4 socket: twice as fast!" You can even see how the left system has 8 task manager performance boxes up, compared to the right system, which has 16. Even Randy Allen, before the demo starts, stated that it was a 4 socket system being used.

    I'm not sure who you are claiming to be lying.
  7. Self pwnage.

    Karma is a bitch, eh?
  8. Freakazoid says:



    EP!C FA!L
  9. Conumdrum said:
    Yep your an AMD fanboi, it is perfectly clear.

    No,I'm an AMD fanboi.Op is an AMD fantasy boi.Big difference
  10. Man... brent is going to be pissed...
  11. OP: Crawl yourself out of your parents' basement and get a life. Stop digging through YouTube for questionable content videos starting flame wars over some n00b pwnage omg wtf haxors junk.

    Sorry. I couldn't resist.

    OMG! Can you believe it! Britney's sister and Angelina had their babies!

    Can you find that video?
  12. yomamafor1 said:
    Man... brent is going to be pissed...

    What he don't know, won't kill me.
  13. I don't know... maybe some n00b would pop up.

    *clubs Seal
  14. enigma067 said:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VGiv9Dtrc5Q

    In the above video, you will see an AMD representative
    demo the quad-core Barcelona in relation to a dual core Opteron.

    The dual core Opteron is on the left and the quad core
    Barcelona is on the right. Dual is 2, Quad is 4 which gives a total of 6 cores.

    NOW, in the below video, an Intel fanboy uses the
    SAME video above and LIES about the total number of cores:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H1_c-9i5-Ao

    He claims the AMD setup has 16 cores.
    Again Dual core + Quad core = 6 cores, not 16.
    He's off by 10 cores.
    Of course we both know he's a liar, right?

    Why would anybody feel so threatened by AMD that they have to spread falsehoods?
    The truth is perfectly clear.



    This post also displays the intellegence of an AMD fanboy. They know how to count, but multiplication isn't their best.


    THE VIDEO TITLE SAYS: "AMD quad-core 4 sockets demo: twice as fast!"

    Now here comes the hard part:

    Quad Core processors = four cores per socket

    4 Sockets = four places to put aforementioned quad-core processors

    And now the REALLY hard part:

    4x4 = 16


    I don't even know where you got 6 from. Hell, if you even added the numbers you'd get 8. You just plain fail.












    Sorry about all the pictures, I'm not used to fails that epic.
  15. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

    Well done TC.
  16. Hehe...... mine was a good one too so add mine + yours = freaktastic.
  17. This is funny I go for longevity thats why I stick with AMD plus I hear Intel has exclusive rights to outperform AMD when it comes to Benchmarks. Would someone pls break down how synthetic benchmarking shows 100% CPU utilization and then explain to me how does it compare to the real world. I might be wrong I might be right. Get serious why would you buy a CPU over 5 or maybe 10% increase in performance. What do you do play video games?
  18. Whoa whoa whoa....so, what you're saying is....4 multiplied by 4 really is 16? So 4 sockets and 4 cores doesn't actually = 6? Lol, Maybe I should have paid more attention in math. :??:
  19. Quote:
    This is funny I go for longevity thats why I stick with AMD plus I hear Intel has exclusive rights to outperform AMD when it comes to Benchmarks. Would someone pls break down how synthetic benchmarking shows 100% CPU utilization and then explain to me how does it compare to the real world. I might be wrong I might be right. Get serious why would you buy a CPU over 5 or maybe 10% increase in performance. What do you do play video games?


    Synthetic means nothing. I always use real world over synthetic.
  20. enigma067 said:
    ...
    The truth is perfectly clear.


    evidently not
  21. Quote:
    This is funny I go for longevity thats why I stick with AMD plus I hear Intel has exclusive rights to outperform AMD when it comes to Benchmarks. Would someone pls break down how synthetic benchmarking shows 100% CPU utilization and then explain to me how does it compare to the real world. I might be wrong I might be right. Get serious why would you buy a CPU over 5 or maybe 10% increase in performance. What do you do play video games?


    Intel seems to own the real world tests as well.

    How's your 939 Slot Processor Doing?
    AMD has changed Sockets more recently than Intel.
  22. To sum this thread up,

  23. lolz, Check your source before automatically flaming others. I not an intel or amd fanboy, I just go with whoever is better at the time.

    Intel has been for the last couple years so recently I've gone with them.

    Does this mean Amd sucks? no It merely means they need to do more RnD to catch up.

    Does this make all Amd fanboys suck? no, but it does mean I can laugh at them whilst my intel processor speeds by.

    Of course, if Amd created a processor to outperform intel, then I would switch to that and laugh at the intel fanboys.
  24. Very funny thread. I feel so stupid.
    I watched the whole thing, read it. and said ... wow.
  25. This post requires additional fail:









  26. Quote:
    Lets change the name of the thread:

    "An AMD Fanboy gets caught STUPID"

    Quote:
    Of course, if Amd created a processor to outperform intel, then I would switch to that and laugh at the intel fanboys.


    You mean like 2003-2006 when Athlon64 ruled the world?

    Yeah, those were the days...



    Total agreement with Bytch.

    I loved the FX processor days (not counting the FX quadfather). Back when AMD had head room and Intel had none. Everytime Intel was able to squeeze out a few more MHZ AMD would just dip into their headroom and release a new processor that was clocked higher. The good 'ole days.
  27. Man....that guy is gonna get so much crap if he ever posts again...lol



  28. figured i'd add a few of my own.
  29. actually, IF I remember right, back in the 90's, it was Intel that couldn't count correctly.

  30. :lol:
  31. Need to find good photo for this guy..

    You failed big time op


  32. Heres one

    Complete fan failure
  33. the last resort said:


    Sorry bro, but you failed at fail pictures!
Ask a new question

Read More

CPUs Quad Core Video AMD Dual Core