Adventures in running at E8400 at 400mhz bus speed.
Topic: effects on Windows XP operating system
mainboard: ASUS P5B-e, bios 1803
400 x 9 =3.6 Ghz (C1E=yes)
vcore = 1.2625
Mem= 5 5 5 18 (1.8v) manually entered (non-SPD) ([qty 2] DDR2 800 dual channel)
PCI freq= 100
The effect of an improperly over-clocked E8400 on the Windows XP operating system seems to be this : (Assuming one bad over-clock (non-over voltage), then use of info as per above)= CPU fails Prime95 benchmark testing using info (as per above)
a CPU that appears to be defective, after over-clocking sessions, when tested on a fresh install of an XP operating system, then tests out (at 3.6 Ghz as per above) as being non-defective (passes all tests on Prime95).
How can an XP operating system be corrupted by over-clocking?
How can one correct this XP operating system corruption without a fresh install of the XP operating system?
Topic: effects on Windows XP operating system
mainboard: ASUS P5B-e, bios 1803
400 x 9 =3.6 Ghz (C1E=yes)
vcore = 1.2625
Mem= 5 5 5 18 (1.8v) manually entered (non-SPD) ([qty 2] DDR2 800 dual channel)
PCI freq= 100
The effect of an improperly over-clocked E8400 on the Windows XP operating system seems to be this : (Assuming one bad over-clock (non-over voltage), then use of info as per above)= CPU fails Prime95 benchmark testing using info (as per above)
a CPU that appears to be defective, after over-clocking sessions, when tested on a fresh install of an XP operating system, then tests out (at 3.6 Ghz as per above) as being non-defective (passes all tests on Prime95).
How can an XP operating system be corrupted by over-clocking?
How can one correct this XP operating system corruption without a fresh install of the XP operating system?