If you're getting 80fps and you're happy with your settings then don't bother (in fact I bet you could max out settings and still get fps). If you are going to upgrade you should just do your mobo, cpu, and ram. I don't think putting any more money into a single-core machine is that viable right now.
I would say a min of 2 gigs of RAM for gaming, I have 4, but a 32 bit OS. Turn the settings to high. I ran the game with a 7900gs and a gig of RAM and I think I got around 50-70 fps all on high at 1280x1024.
Message edited by one-shot on 08-11-2008 at 11:32:43 PM
Well I hate to tell you but your not a professional with that rig or those settings.
You need alot more then Ram.
Your post is useless. He plays CS:S, not crysis. His comp is more than capable of playing that game, and just for your information lots of pro players turn down their settings.
I dont think RAM is the issue, I think you need a bit more power in the CPU department. Pick up an AthlonX2, your gonna want something at 2.6Ghz or faster.
Another gig of RAM will help, but I dont think your gonna see much of a jump with that.
EDIT: is your ram just one stick or do you have 2x512MB? If you have one 1GB stick, than adding another will allow for dual channel operation, which WOULD help.
Message edited by B-Unit on 08-11-2008 at 11:52:04 PM
Thx for the tips sofar, I just got the 9800gtx+ today and i play pro in Africa so i thought maybe i should get more ram, but i dont have time for a new mobo atm, can i get a dualcore 64X2 amd cpu for my current mobo? or is my mobo too crap?
and should i get one more cheap ram chip 1gb 800mhz or should i remove the single chip i have now and add a ram module kit with 2 proper dual channel ocz ramchips, instead?
More RAM is good for gaming in general, but may not help you specifically with CS:S.
I just fired up CS:S (had to blow the dust off of it) and my system in sig is using 784 MB. I only have antivirus running besides. Windows XP of course.
Grab that CPU and the DDR2-800 and enjoy. If you think you might want to try your hand at overclocking, consider the 1066Mhz memory, but if not, 800 will do just fine.
What resolution do you play at? The higher the resolution, the less of a bottleneck you will have. However, CS:S is undemanding enough that you should have no problems at any resolution.
By the way, Im looking into some custom drivers, but it seems the DNA forceware drivers dont support my 9800GFX+ yet.
Can sum1 tell me plz which drivers are the best for my inno3d 9800GTX+?
get the RAM definately, it's soooo cheap these days.
You're FPS is very odd, though. I was able to get 100+ FPS in GG, 70+ in Dust2 and ~40 in Office... all on a AMD 3500+, 2GB RAM (which was in single channel), and a 7900GS. You should be getting 180FPS++ with that rig, even with a gig of RAM.
Message edited by doomsdaydave11 on 08-14-2008 at 01:27:25 AM
------------------------------E8400 3.6Ghz | 4GB DDR2-800 | HD4870 | 780GB HDD Space | VX550W | WinXP | Win7-64 | Ubuntu Studio 8.10
Reply to doomsdaydave11
Because any type of slowdown is a kiiler. That, and things are BIGGER at lower resolutions, meaning its easier to notice the guys head poking out from the other side of the create he is hiding behind. I would know; I compete in TWL and CAL.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.