Word :    Username :           
 

I recently SLI'd my 9800 GTX. Using RivaTuner 2.09, I have OC'd the cards to 800/2000/2400 and put the fans to 70%. My questions are: does RivaTuner apply the settings to both cards? and is there any way to test for stability? I have been using ATI tool and that gives a ton of artifacts and then no artifacts every other time. Ntune is out of the question (BSOD every time). I know in Company of Heroes Gold I am not getting smooth gameplay or stability in the campaigns no matter what I clock the cards to. Seems to work fine everywhere else.

Edit: edited the OC to 800/2000/2400 (Core/SP/RAM) and I should mention that both my cards were EVGA factory OC'd. Sorry for sounding like I was trying to fry my computer, I was in a real hurry this morning before work.


Message edited by jcorqian on 06-26-2008 at 02:45:11 AM
Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.
- 0 +

the clocks do apply to both cards, but at those frequencies dude, you'll damage your card. Look at my configuration, I don't even keep it at that anymore. Your straining the card like hell at 800 especially since the majority of 9800 GTXs can't do 800.

Anyways to answer your questions, yes both cards are applied, Nvidia control Panel has a stability test option if you hav ntune installed.

Also try 3dmark, or cinebench to stress your card. You'll get artifacts I'll bet, I mean your memory clocks are insane, atleast put your fan to 100%. If you achieve stability I'll be surprised.

I'll say it again, your in the danger zone with the clocks. My opinion

------------------------------ Folding@HOME Team: 163116
http://pid.us.playstation.com//user/L1qu1dat1on.jpg
Lapped CPU
http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/501789.png
Reply to L1qu1d

l1qu1d the 9800GTX's 0.8ns memory is rated at 2.4Ghz by default, i seen many of them goto 2.5 or even 2.6ghz.

is the 1200 the stream processor or the memory at single rate?

the highest i have seen is 800/2000/2600(Core/SP/RAM)
but i see most stuck on 780/1950/2500(Core/SP/RAM)

Reply to iluvgillgill
- 0 +

iluvgillgill wrote :

l1qu1d the 9800GTX's 0.8ns memory is rated at 2.4Ghz by default, i seen many of them goto 2.5 or even 2.6ghz.

is the 1200 the stream processor or the memory at single rate?

the highest i have seen is 800/2000/2600(Core/SP/RAM)
but i see most stuck on 780/1950/2500(Core/SP/RAM)



Exactly my point, majority moves around 780, and pushing the memory soo much is scary. I think that its unnecessary to achieve what is around 1-2 fps more.

------------------------------ Folding@HOME Team: 163116
http://pid.us.playstation.com//user/L1qu1dat1on.jpg
Lapped CPU
http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/501789.png
Reply to L1qu1d

in his spec i dont get which is which.800/1200/2400

so is sp running at slow ass 1200?or screaming 2400?

Reply to iluvgillgill
- 0 +

I duno either. For my GX2 I can get it to 1200(2400 Memory), but it artifacts lol.


Message edited by L1qu1d on 06-25-2008 at 03:07:20 PM
------------------------------ Folding@HOME Team: 163116
http://pid.us.playstation.com//user/L1qu1dat1on.jpg
Lapped CPU
http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/501789.png
Reply to L1qu1d

I don't think the core and memory clocks are unreasonable. I have them clocked the same on my 9800GTX and it runs stable 24/7 with 70% fan speed (it runs as cool as my CPU) and no artifacts. Have never tried shaders that high as I kept the core and shaders linked when I OC'd using Rivatuner.

------------------------------ XFX 790i Ultra - Q9450 @ 3.2GHz - 4GB Corsair DDR3 @ 1600 (7-7-7-20) - XFX 9800 GTX (800/1200/2000) - X-Fi Xtreme Gamer
Reply to mothhive

I think his clocks are listed the same way as mine (the order they are displayed in GPUz) Core/RAM/SP

(sorry about double post, it won't let me edit)

Reply to mothhive

2400 SP??oh my!i never seen that high.oh well.

Reply to iluvgillgill
- 0 +

hmm weird my GX2 only goes to a max 2250...

------------------------------ Folding@HOME Team: 163116
http://pid.us.playstation.com//user/L1qu1dat1on.jpg
Lapped CPU
http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/501789.png
Reply to L1qu1d

because the GX2 use the same memory as the 8800GTS 512. so really Nvidia have differentiate 8800GTS 512 to the 9800GTX in terms of memory and bandwidth.

Reply to iluvgillgill
- 0 +

bastards, they make another revision like a 280 GTX+ I swear I'm nuking their facility:)

------------------------------ Folding@HOME Team: 163116
http://pid.us.playstation.com//user/L1qu1dat1on.jpg
Lapped CPU
http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/501789.png
Reply to L1qu1d

well thats the 55nm GTX 280!lol i wish they do really put GDDR5 in them. so the real battle will start out with the 4870X2. of because hope it doesnt melt itself first. i seen review of the HD4780 loaded at 93C with working Auto fan controll.

Reply to iluvgillgill
- 0 +

lol wow who wants hamburgers:D

Did you see the video of the guy cooking an egg on the GX2 with fan set to low? LOL

------------------------------ Folding@HOME Team: 163116
http://pid.us.playstation.com//user/L1qu1dat1on.jpg
Lapped CPU
http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/501789.png
Reply to L1qu1d
- 0 +
------------------------------ Folding@HOME Team: 163116
http://pid.us.playstation.com//user/L1qu1dat1on.jpg
Lapped CPU
http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/501789.png
Reply to L1qu1d

its bate that video. its obvious that ther person heat the pan up beforehand.

Reply to iluvgillgill
- 0 +

I still think its possible, think about 100 degrees:) if you leave it on:P it can be done I'll try it one day when the GX2s are worth 1 penny:)

------------------------------ Folding@HOME Team: 163116
http://pid.us.playstation.com//user/L1qu1dat1on.jpg
Lapped CPU
http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/501789.png
Reply to L1qu1d

if a SLI GX2 with the card housing remove then it might be possible. you wanna make your own video to testify?

Reply to iluvgillgill

i sure it worth more then 1 penny at scrapyard.

Reply to iluvgillgill
- 0 +

:D

------------------------------ Folding@HOME Team: 163116
http://pid.us.playstation.com//user/L1qu1dat1on.jpg
Lapped CPU
http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/501789.png
Reply to L1qu1d

or i will buy it of you for double the price 2 penny!!deal?

Reply to iluvgillgill
- 0 +

No dice lol 1 millions dollars:D

------------------------------ Folding@HOME Team: 163116
http://pid.us.playstation.com//user/L1qu1dat1on.jpg
Lapped CPU
http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/501789.png
Reply to L1qu1d

quick fried egg FTW!LOL

Reply to iluvgillgill

Sorry, I should have specified that both my cards are EVGA pre-overclocked so I don't seem like an idiot pushing my core speeds up by 130 lol. No, one is the SSC and the other is the KO, and I am thinking I will only OC to around 780 or so to be safe. Was in a big hurry this morning. I am currently at 780/1970/2430.

Ntune will not work for me and are there any alternatives to Cinebench or 3DMark? Can I get 3DMark free?

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by jcorqian on 06-26-2008 at 02:49:49 AM
Reply to jcorqian

jcorqian wrote :

Sorry, I should have specified that both my cards are EVGA pre-overclocked so I don't seem like an idiot pushing my core speeds up by 130 lol. No, one is the SSC and the other is the KO, and I am thinking I will only OC to around 780 or so to be safe. Was in a big hurry this morning. I am currently at 780/1970/2430.

Ntune will not work for me and are there any alternatives to Cinebench or 3DMark? Can I get 3DMark free?


It's insignificant whether they are pre overclocked or not. A pre overclocked card is simply a stock card with a different bios. They will still be able to overclock only as high as a stock.
Oh, and yes, ntune is awful, its stability test crashes my perfectly stable system at any settings. Whats even more bizarre is that each of the individual 5 tests will work, but running them all together crashes.


Message edited by Asian PingPong on 06-26-2008 at 03:12:46 AM
------------------------------ "Quad cores are only good for burning CD's"
Q6600 @ 3.3 | Xigmatek HDT-S1283 |
8800gts G92 512mb (756/1890/1044) | GA-P35-DS3L
Reply to Asian PingPong

Hmmm, are you sure about that? It seems in reviews of pre-OC'd cards they are always able to OC it further to speeds that I haven't seen any review site OC a normal card to. I'm not trying to disregard what you said, and I think that what you said makes plenty of logical sense... Can I get a second opinion?

Anyway, current speeds are 780/1981/1215 (2430) and seem stable at 70% fan speed in my Antec 900. I got ATI Tool working properly (turns out FRAPS was in the background and that was messing it up). Temps according to ATI Tool are around 60 right after I quit a game. Does anyone think this is still pushing the cards too hard? Should I stress test with a different program as well?

Reply to jcorqian

stress the card using 3dmark 06 or vantage with the highest resolution and max AA/AF possible and loop it for 1 day. if it doesnt fail then its all good.

Reply to iluvgillgill
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > SLI OC and Temps
Go to:

There are 1077 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them