Newegg goes Phenom Crazy!!!

BaronMatrix

Splendid
Dec 14, 2005
6,655
0
25,790
Yes, folks, our friends at the Egg have established themesleves as THE Phenom retailer. Included in their portfolio:

9950 Retail and OEM
9850 Retail and OEM
9150e -$179 65W
9650 - Retail and OEM
9550 - Retail
9600B - OEM
9750 - Retail and OEM


The only thing missing at this point is the 9350e. It looks like AMD is ramping K10 finally as the 13xx series showed up last week. Now all they need is to get Alienware to release a true Spider platform with 790GX and water cooled Phenoms plus 2x4870X2s.

Now that would be a high-end system. Phenom should get to 3.4GHz on water with SB750. Of course, I would want to let Vista turn it down so that I don't single-handedly overload my apartment's wiring.

J\K. It wouldn't be that bad, but it would be kind of hungry. But considering that I may have 2-3 hours per week for gaming, the chip would NEVER be under full load.
 

weskurtz81

Distinguished
Apr 13, 2006
1,557
0
19,780
Wouldn't the CPU bottleneck two 4870X2's? Big AMD fan here, but I don't know if that is the CPU I would use for those powerful cards. I could be completely wrong though....
 

reddozen

Distinguished
May 11, 2007
62
0
18,630
I also don't know that 3.4 is right.
They are getting 3.3~3.5 on air with the new deneb core.
With water cooling, I would think you could push more than just 3.4.
 

1haplo

Distinguished
Feb 24, 2007
541
0
19,060
Title is wrong. Should read AMD is finally shipping Phenoms to retail sellers!.

Or

AMD ships all of its working Phenoms to Newegg?

Newegg did not go Phenom Crazy.... They just sell what the distributors or manufactures send them.

Newegg went HD4850 Crazy or Newegg went Floppy drive Crazy, they have more then one listed......

1Haplo

 

BaronMatrix

Splendid
Dec 14, 2005
6,655
0
25,790



A quick Google for 9850 overclock will show that at 3.2GHz\2.4L3, the Phenom is neck and neck with Penryn in CineBench. It was always said that Phenom doesn't shine until 2.6GHz+. Some guy at xtremesystems did it. If you have two 4870X2's you are playing at 2560 (unless you're crazy) so the GPU is taking the brunt of the work. Even mighty Penryn needs fast GPUs for high res gaming.


A couple of weeks ago some guy tested quad SLI with 9850 and a 9770. The difference was minimal at high res. I'll see if I can find the link.
 

BaronMatrix

Splendid
Dec 14, 2005
6,655
0
25,790


As soon as I get around to it. My 4400+ is still churnign out the frames, code and VMs, so no rush. I'm definitely waiting for 790GX. I'm thinking about buying a BluRay for it and pumping out to the TV. Hopefully, plugging in the discrete card doesn't turn off the ports.

I guess putting systems together isn't as much fun as it used to be.
 

BaronMatrix

Splendid
Dec 14, 2005
6,655
0
25,790



No. The title is correct. They have had Phenom since the B2 stepping. I guess you can't take a joke. I was just shocked when I saw all of them finally. The 9650 was MIA for months.
 

BaronMatrix

Splendid
Dec 14, 2005
6,655
0
25,790



Last I heard they should show up at the end of the month. Anand did a test with a Foxconn and Fudzilla showed pics of another one.
 
^Um look at the QX6850. Not a 45nm part and can easily OC to 4GHz.

As for your idea, unless the die shrink includes major enhancements to the arch I wouldn't expect much more than 10-15% improvement over previous Phenoms.
 

ro3dog

Distinguished
Mar 20, 2006
243
0
18,680

this too was said about the 4800 gpus,now Nvidia is caught in a storm.
 
The difference is that the transition from 3800 to 4800 was an architecture change, while this is only a die shrink. A closer analogy would be 9800 GTX to 9800 GTX+, unless they are also changing the architecture significantly.
 

sailer

Splendid
Saw an ad from Newegg showing a 2950 BE for $220 and free shipping. Now if they had a motherboard with a SB750 chip to go with it, it might be worthwhile. My old 939 socket 4400+ is getting a bit long of tooth these days. It handles simple stuff, office apps, but none of the new games.
 


What this guy below said. Big difference.



Exactally. The 3800 to 4800 was a major change. They added more shaders (more than 2x) 2x the texture units and they also made a lot of architectual changes compared to the R600.

Deneb on the other hand is just a die shrink like Penryn and unless they are doing a whole bunch of changes Deneb will not make leaps and bounds in performance.
 


I'm not sure I understand but Asus has 4 AMD 780g's - and a 780v - - - > >
http://www.asus.com/products.aspx?l1=3&l2=149&l3=639
I imagine they will be adding a 780g 'sideport' version soon ...

AMD chipset drivers are distributed by the OEM, who may elect to enable different features and adjustments, voltages, etc. thru their BIOSs; this would effect the available settings and tweaks from within AOD.



ro3dog could have used a better analogy - something like R600 to RV670 which was effectively a die-shrink from 80nm to 55nm. Because of the NDAs no one can comment and so the move from 65nm to 45nm is a mystery. No one expects exceptional performance gains but AMD may have a few rabbits to pull out of their hat, and most importantly they should see big bumps in margins for Q408 and Q109.

I think available desktop 45nms will be slow (to market-lol) in Q4 and you will see a really big push on the enterprise side. The 45nm Optys don't have to be as fast as Nehalem but if they are close enough in overall platform performance and efficiency I see guys 'Opting' to stick with an upgraded Socket F+. The wraps are coming off HT3 and the smackdown with Quickpath is of more benefit to AMD than fighting the GHz Wars on the desktop with Intel.