I like WD as well. Go for the Green if its a backup drive or look for the Black for OS and Apps. The Black is faster and the Green of course tries to save power as much as it can. I would go for the 640gig or 1tb Black for OS they have slightly more efficient platter designs ( 2x 320 or 3x333 ) and that increases performance over the 500gig too.
Message edited by anort3 on 09-28-2009 at 10:32:05 AM
------------------------------EP-45 UD3R/ E8400@3.6 wZerotherm Nirvana/4gb Corsair DDR2-800/EVGA 9800GTX+/Corsair 750TX/2xWD Black AALS 640gb RAID 0+1 Windows 7/2xWD Cavier 250gb RAID 0 Windows XP Pro/Seagate 160gb Backup/X-Fi Xtreme Gamer/Logitech Z-2300/Samsung SynchMaster 906BW
Reply to anort3
Samsung is not available in my area. even WD drives are hard to get. Vendors here sell only SGT.
Whats the performance difference between 7200.11 with 32M and 7200.12 with 16MB
I read somewhere that performance wise SGT is best because of single platter design in new generation. but WD drives are more reliable. It is just cos of FW issues SGT had with 7200.11 gen drives?
how much performance difference will be observed between 32M and 16M bufffers for 500GB drives. Is 16M cache buffer enough for a 500GBier?