Hello Peeps,
I'm trying to decide between 2 x 4850 or one 4870. I tend to sell my graphics card every 6-12 months and for that reason feel that the 4870x2 will not be a good buy for me, due to the cost which will be close to £300.
Looking at all the benchies, the 3870x2 is beaten in most games by the single 4870, while costing considerably less. In the UK, 3870x2 is about £230 while the 4870 is £180..... I suppose next year a single mid card ATI may beat the 4870x2 while costing less, and if so, I will be buying that next year...sorry, had to explain my feelings before people say wait for the 4870x2 LOL!
So, back to the question 2 x 4850 or one 4870? I was set on the 2 x 4850 looking at The Tech Report review which shows it beating the 280GTX, and everything else, in almost everything:
http://www.techreport.com/articles.x/14990/11
BUT, the GURU3D says otherwise:
http://www.guru3d.com/article/amd-ati-radeon-hd-4850-review-force-3d--powercolor/19
And now I am confused........
Ta.
I'm trying to decide between 2 x 4850 or one 4870. I tend to sell my graphics card every 6-12 months and for that reason feel that the 4870x2 will not be a good buy for me, due to the cost which will be close to £300.
Looking at all the benchies, the 3870x2 is beaten in most games by the single 4870, while costing considerably less. In the UK, 3870x2 is about £230 while the 4870 is £180..... I suppose next year a single mid card ATI may beat the 4870x2 while costing less, and if so, I will be buying that next year...sorry, had to explain my feelings before people say wait for the 4870x2 LOL!
So, back to the question 2 x 4850 or one 4870? I was set on the 2 x 4850 looking at The Tech Report review which shows it beating the 280GTX, and everything else, in almost everything:
http://www.techreport.com/articles.x/14990/11
BUT, the GURU3D says otherwise:
http://www.guru3d.com/article/amd-ati-radeon-hd-4850-review-force-3d--powercolor/19
And now I am confused........
Ta.