I am upgrading. Merging some old components with mostly new ones. I'm have a new case, psu, additional card for sli, new mobo and new pcu.
I'm waiting on a soundcard because of all the negatives surrounding creative, and I cant justify $180 for the azuntech.
The new evga 780i mobo has optical out (required for my speakers, which are good). Would I get better sound out of mobo vs. my older sound card? I'm running vista ultimate btw.
if u use the pc for gaming or listening musics just choose onboard sound, it's quite good, the quality of onboard sound nowdays has no big difference with add-on soundcard.But if u have 'pro' ears and mobo sound doesn't satisfy u, choose those expensive Creative's soundcards.
stick with onboard, Vista practically eliminated SoundBlaster cards' usefulness for sound replication due to a stripping of the HAL (hardware abstraction layer) that Vista impliments... hence why Creative's cards are all on blast now (that and extreme lack of support for vista in the previous months... google "Daniel K drivers" )... people that bought X-Fi cards right before Vista are pissed because they're not getting any benefit other than a slightly lower CPU utilization.
------------------------------[WARNING:] Post counts do NOT reflect level of expertise.
[DISCLAIMER:] If I want your opinion, I'll ask for it.
[QUESTION OF THE DAY]: And just WHO is... Tom Shardware?
Reply to truromeo4juliet
I'd say it really depends on your speakers/headphones. Most folks that say they cannot discern any difference between onboard and a contemporary sound card are likely in one of these scenarios:
A. They're using optical/coaxial digital output, in which case they're bypassing the onboard sound's DAC (or soundcard's for that matter), which is a good thing since they're generally weak compared to that of a discrete card. Tip, if you're using the Logitech Z-5500 and a contemporary soundcard USE THE CARD'S ANALOG OUTPUTS.
B. They're using lower end speaker system (including the Logitech Z-5500) or lower end headphones. Some are even using the optical output with the Logitech Z-5500. IMO, the Logitech's DAC is nothing to write home about and sounds rather dull when compared to the DAC of even a X-Fi Extreme Music, let alone an Auzentech Prelude or better. If you've got a pair of Sennheiser, AKG, Grados, or Byer's that cost more than $200US you've probably got enough resolution to hear the differences in opamps and DACs.
C. Your hearing has been somehow degraded (this is not a joke or insult and is quite common, especially as we age).
Onboard sound has definitely improved, but its still not the same as having a GOOD contemporary sound card, if you've got decent speakers/headphones.
Message edited by halcyon on 07-30-2008 at 03:46:55 PM
I am switching from a phillips 550watt htib. It's a few years old and starting to die on me.
I did buy the Z500. I read good reviews. You say to not use the optical? Can I ask why? Digital > Analog, no?
Like I said, I would like to upgrade to a soundcard, not only for sound, but for some fps help. But like stated, the whole vista thing is just plain dumb.
I am switching from a phillips 550watt htib. It's a few years old and starting to die on me.
I did buy the Z500. I read good reviews. You say to not use the optical? Can I ask why? Digital > Analog, no?
Like I said, I would like to upgrade to a soundcard, not only for sound, but for some fps help. But like stated, the whole vista thing is just plain dumb.
Let your ears be the judge. If you use the Z-5500's optical input you'll be using its DAC too. You've got to decide which DAC sounds best to you, the Z-5500's or the Audigy's. My guess would be that the Audigy's DAC and opamp would be better, but I'm not saying that the Z-5500's will sound bad. I just like the sound of the X-Fi's DAC/opamp better than the Z-5500's. Sound's cleaner, a few grains less cloudy. I doubt that the Audigy's would sound much worse than the X-Fi's...but again, let your ears be the judge.
I think if you used an analog connection from the AudigyZs to the Z-5500 and put the Z-5500 in "6-Channel Direct" mode you'll have the best possible sounding scenario.
I wanted to add that the Z-5500's are fine for PC Multi-Media speakers, I enjoy mine. It's got bass that can kill the bacteria on your wall, though a bit boomy. The sats aren't great at dispersion, but they're not horrible either.
Message edited by halcyon on 07-30-2008 at 05:00:37 PM
I wanted to add that the Z-5500's are fine for PC Multi-Media speakers, I enjoy mine. It's got bass that can kill the bacteria on your wall, though a bit boomy. The sats aren't great at dispersion, but they're not horrible either.
Yeah, I have a real nice multimedia system in my living room. I use that for movies/xbox/music etc. Plus a decent aftermarket system in my car.
I will use the logitech for games and occasionally music. Nothing extreme is needed. But I am one of those guys who wants the best out there. Surround sound gaming is almost as important to me as good graphics. Real immerses you in games like fear, bioshock and hl2.
Thanks for your input guys. I think I'll just play around and see what works.
A decent sounds card will get you smoother, faster frame rates in some games since the sounds card takes on the sound load. I went from onboard sound to a X-fi Xtreme Gamer and I notice a big difference in sound quality and smoothness in games.
A decent sounds card will get you smoother, faster frame rates in some games since the sounds card takes on the sound load. I went from onboard sound to a X-fi Xtreme Gamer and I notice a big difference in sound quality and smoothness in games.
My .02
That's true as long as its a Creative Labs based/licensed solution. If its not a Creative Labs card (or Prelude 7.1) that has an APU (i.e., the SB Extreme Audio) you get no CPU off-loading for audio. TBH, I'd not think it too much of an issue with dual and quad cores being the norm now. Nowadays, I'd tend to think there's plenty of CPU power to handle in game sound for those with a multi-core processor, especially a quad core.
Message edited by halcyon on 07-30-2008 at 09:48:46 PM
I was just reading on creatives website they they released new drivers for full vista support. Has anyone actually downloaded the drivers and tested them?
I was just reading on creatives website they they released new drivers for full vista support. Has anyone actually downloaded the drivers and tested them?
Thanks for the heads-up. I've just installed them and they seem to work great in Vista64. ...but to be fair, so did the previous edition, and the edition before that.
It seems like the bad press with the Daniel K. event really got their attention. Good job Creative, you're works not done (will it ever be?) but at least there's some readily apparent effort.
There's no benefit to running optical (from onboard, or sound card) to an optical input on my z5500?
I was under the impression that buy running digital all the way, you're not copressing or changing the audio at any point and that is best. maybe I'm confused with video.
Anyhow, like I said before. I'll play around with it.
It really depends where you want the digital to analog conversion to be done...it is going to be done. It can be done by the Z-5500s or it can be done by the soundcard. So, you have to look at the quality of the conversion, analog connection, etc., etc. If you have a good soundcard then you're paying for its ability to make a high quality conversion and its high quality analog output, amongst other things. If you're going to stick with onboard sound, use the digital output so you can bypass some of the problems inherent with onboard sound, like EMI, poor quality-poor specs audio components.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.