EVGA GTX 260 FTW -vs- BFG GTX 260 OCX

Pegasus15

Distinguished
Apr 10, 2008
12
0
18,510
I want to buy one of these grapfic cards and I would like to know which one do you think should be the most powerfull

EVGA GTX 260 FTW
GPU: 666 MHz
Memory: 2214 MHz
Memory Bandwith: 123,9 GB/s

or

BFG GTX 260 OCX
GPU: 655 MHz
Memory: 2250 MHz
Memory Bandwith: 126 GB/s

Thanks to all.
 

pauldh

Illustrious
Pretty much the same thing. I'd prefer evga but would buy whichever is cheaper and/or offers the better bundle (free game, etc.)

Unless you have an SLI mobo and want the option to add a second card, you may want to look into the HD4870 instead. So far it looks to be >= the GTX260 and costs $100 less.
 

Pegasus15

Distinguished
Apr 10, 2008
12
0
18,510
The 4870 is better than a GTX 260, but maybe not better than a GTX 260 OC. Also, I'm curious to see if the PhysX will make a difference when the driver will be available in a near future.
 

ovaltineplease

Distinguished
May 9, 2008
1,198
0
19,280
I wouldn't count too much on physx really, but you never know.

As of today, I actually own 2 gtx260s - performance is definitely good and they overclock very well

But if you don't have an SLI motherboard already, then the 4870 is really the better buy - any of the heat issues and whatnot that have been mentioned will be rectified by software updates from AMD pretty soon.

Now lastly, maybe I just got lucky with my 2 cards - but both of them are stock clocked cards and I had zero problems getting them to gtx280 FTW clocks. Very stable for 3-4 hours of gameplay so far, benchmarking etc; and very acceptable thermals between 65-70 max under load.

Really though, the only problem with the 4870 is the fan speed, and that will be fixed soon. The 4870 is a very good card and its 100$ cheaper than the gtx260 for comparable performance, so it is the better buy if you have a standard or crossfire compatible motherboard already~
 

Pegasus15

Distinguished
Apr 10, 2008
12
0
18,510
ovaltineplease,

If you have two of these cards, are they very noisy as tom's hardware said in their review?

By the way, the 100$ difference was before today's price drop for the 260 GTX
 

one-shot

Distinguished
Jan 13, 2006
1,369
0
19,310
You can't compare a non oc'd 4870 to an o'cd GTX260 because you could just as easily overclock the 4870 and it'll beat it....for $100 cheaper. If you already have a SLI board get the Nvidia, but if you're looking for a new board get an intel chipset and Crossfire the 4870's and save money. Even with that being said, if you still bought 2 4870's you'd save $200 which would buy you a pretty nice board to give them a home.
 

ovaltineplease

Distinguished
May 9, 2008
1,198
0
19,280



I don't think anyone was comparing non oc-ed cards to oc-ed cards; I specifically said that the 4870s are poor overclockers at this point because of software issues. So seeing as the only way to overclock the 4870 is with either a fan mod or a new cooler entirely; that collectively quantifies basically ANYTHING other than a 4800 series as being a better overclocker than a 4800 series.

Benchmarks have already shown that the 4870 and gtx260 are nearly parallel performance in most applications, the main selling featuer of the 4870 is PRICE, and that is a damn good selling feature given that they are so close in performance. But really, graphics cards "beating" each other? Sure, if you want to make this into a fanboy thing go right ahead but I already said specifically that the 4870 is slightly more performance for less cost so it is therein the better buy unless you already have an Nforce board.



Pegasus15: They are really no more audible than the 8800 GTs which I was using before; take that as you will. I run them at 55% fan speed and I can't hear them over my antec 900s fans.

Would I recommend them for an HTPC? No, they are definitely not that quiet as the antec 900 while not extremely noisy, does have audible fans.

Pegasus15, if you are planning on operating a single video card or if you are using an Intel chipset motherboard which is crossfire compliant I would advise the 4870 over the gtx260 simply because the 4870 is cheaper for the same performance - and that is a damnably good reason to get them if you have the option.
 

one-shot

Distinguished
Jan 13, 2006
1,369
0
19,310
 

xx12amanxx

Distinguished
Oct 27, 2007
584
16
18,995



Actually all benchmark's ive seen say that the 4870 pretty much smokes the gtx260 like a fat philly blunt and for cheaper !
 

ovaltineplease

Distinguished
May 9, 2008
1,198
0
19,280



yea, totally except in GRAW2, UT3, Crysis.

Its even down the middle - they trade blows.
 

xx12amanxx

Distinguished
Oct 27, 2007
584
16
18,995


Not to argue but 3 games out of like 20 that ive seen benchmarked does not mean its even!
 

ovaltineplease

Distinguished
May 9, 2008
1,198
0
19,280



People actually care about FPS numbers in 3 year old games still?
 

copasetic

Distinguished
Jun 9, 2008
218
0
18,680
4870 easily overclocks to 790/1100, which is the max the CCC will allow right now. There's work arounds to get even higher than that.

I've had mine running at 790/1000(4000) for 3 days now with fan at 45%, no trouble at all.
 

ro3dog

Distinguished
Mar 20, 2006
243
0
18,680
ovaltineplease is the true fanboy.at newegg the prices for 4870 and gxt260 are really colse give or take 20-30 $.FTW the 4870
 

L1qu1d

Splendid
Sep 29, 2007
4,615
0
22,790
how is he a fanboy? he agreed that the 4870 smokes the 260 GTX in every game except Crysis, etc.

I agree that the 4870 is dominant, but at the same time, I agree that I want to see more current gen games, I really don't care about games like fear, or ghost recon 2, which was really never that good.

Games like Mass Effect, Cysis, Call of duty 4, GRid, etc:)

I don't think any1 in their right mind is saying the 260 GTX is better than the 4870, but you can't say its bad...its just not puting up as much of a fight as the 4870 which is cheaper
 

ro3dog

Distinguished
Mar 20, 2006
243
0
18,680
Both gtx260 mentioned are oc cards .You need to go back and read his post ,and the 4870 is very easy to oc.You should go back and read his post .
 

ro3dog

Distinguished
Mar 20, 2006
243
0
18,680

Yeah I notice :heink:
 
Newer games like WiC and the Witcher show the 4870 doing better, so to me, its more of a game to game thing, not a newer game thing. Each game has its own demands, some play to the strength of 1 card and not the other, but overall, including newer games the 4870 wins out