Tom's Hardware Forums » Graphic & Displays » Graphics Cards » GTX280 3-Way SLI Crysis Gameplay 1920x1200 8xAA Video
 

GTX280 3-Way SLI Crysis Gameplay 1920x1200 8xAA Video

Add a reply



 Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : GTX280 3-Way SLI Crysis Gameplay 1920x1200 8xAA Video
 
Gamer and Hardware Addict
Profile: member
More Information

here a youtube video I found of GTX280 3-Way SLI Crysis Gameplay 1920x1200 8xAA

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=8Orsk65ib5c enjoy. :P


---------------
Processor: Intel Core2 Duo CPU E6700 4MB L2 Cache @ 2.67Ghz.
Memory: 4GB (PC2 6400)
Video Card: NVIDIA GeForce 7950 GT OC 512mb (565MHz/1430MHz)
Audio: SB X-Fi Xtreme Audio
Related Pr oduct
Register or log in to remove.

Now, we can harness the power of TWO DEATH STARS!
Profile: addict
More Information

That Maxishine guy is awesome, love watching his vids, and now he's doing giveaways.


---------------
E8400@ 3.93Ghz, BFG 9800GX2
4 GB Mushkin DDR 800, Asus P5E X38,
2X Raptor X, X-FI Fatality Pro, Zalman 850 W P.S.
Zalman 9700 CPU Cooler, XCLIO A380 Case, 24" Asus MK241H Monitor
Profile: member
More Information

nice


---------------
Core2Duo e6600 @ 3ghz || 2GB Kingston DDR2-533 @ 667mhz || GeForce 8800GTS @ core 650mhz-memory 2.2ghz || 20" Samsung 204b LCD || 19" Viewsonic CRT || DFI Infinity 975x || 70GB Raptor || Creative Audigy 2 ZS || Creative 4.1+Kenwood 5.1=9.2 Awesomeness =)
Harder Faster Stronger
Profile: member
More Information

you cant get better than that

Serenity Now!
Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information

So 1800$ to play Crysis at 40 fps hmmm tempting lol:P

:pt1cable: :pt1cable: :pt1cable: :pt1cable:


---------------
L1qu1dat1on Ag3
CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 @ 3.6, RAM: 8 gig OCZ 1:1, Fan: Water Cooling, Mobo:Striker II Formula, HDD: 2x's 150 Raptor (RAID 0), VGA: 9800 GX2 Quad PSU:CorsairHX1000 Windows Vista Ultimate 64
Profile: enthusiast

L1qu1d wrote :

So 1800$ to play Crysis at 40 fps hmmm tempting lol:P

:pt1cable: :pt1cable: :pt1cable: :pt1cable:



$1800 to play a mediocre game at 40FPS.


---------------
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 @ 3ghz
VisionTek 4870 780 core/1065 memory
4GB OCZ Reaper Crossfire Edition @ 1066mhz
ASUS P5Q Pro Motherboard
Serenity Now!
Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information

Indeed:) Unless I see a game worth playing I'm not even considering it. i'm running a 1280x1024 Monitor, I don't think I need anything more than 2 8800 GTs:) so 1 9800 GX2 should do plenty:)

I can't wait for SC 2 :D


---------------
L1qu1dat1on Ag3
CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 @ 3.6, RAM: 8 gig OCZ 1:1, Fan: Water Cooling, Mobo:Striker II Formula, HDD: 2x's 150 Raptor (RAID 0), VGA: 9800 GX2 Quad PSU:CorsairHX1000 Windows Vista Ultimate 64
Meowwwww!
Profile: old hand
More Information

spathotan wrote :

$1800 to play a mediocre game at 40FPS.



indeed

Meowwwww!
Profile: old hand
More Information

Monsta wrote :

you cant get better than that



http://pics.bikerag.com/Uploads/data/500/258Troll_spray.jpg

monsta, stop trolling, enough is enough...

Are you an employee of Nvidia, or just a die hard fanboy, whichever it is, dude just go away... :pfff:

Harder Faster Stronger
Profile: member
More Information

Cos I said "you cant get better than that"?
Its a compliment to his rig. Maxishine has great reviews.
Think you need to look up what "Troll" means instead of throwing it around cos you dont like Nvidia. You have just made a Troll of yourself.
Im here to stay, im entitled to my opinion just like everyone else, if you dont like it then maybe you should leave.

Meowwwww!
Profile: old hand
More Information

Monsta wrote :

Cos I said "you cant get better than that"?
Its a compliment to his rig. Maxishine has great reviews.
Think you need to look up what "Troll" means instead of throwing it around cos you dont like Nvidia. You have just made a Troll of yourself.
Im here to stay, im entitled to my opinion just like everyone else, if you dont like it then maybe you should leave.



Monsta sorry didn't know you had such a change of heart b/c as i recall and everybody else will, you started off trolling quite a bit, spouting off such nonsense left and right...

Glad to see you have some reason in you, welcome to the forums! :D

Rich and Chocolatey
Profile: old hand
More Information

Some people actually like playing Crysis, just cause some people don't like it doesn't mean noone does. Its really anything but a bad game in my opinion, I like games that give you at least some freedom in your gameplay.

I do think that gtx280 3way SLI is total overkill though :P

Meowwwww!
Profile: old hand
More Information

ovaltineplease wrote :

Some people actually like playing Crysis, just cause some people don't like it doesn't mean noone does. Its really anything but a bad game in my opinion, I like games that give you at least some freedom in your gameplay.

I do think that gtx280 3way SLI is total overkill though :P



It really isn't too bad of a game, just not a game I'd ever buy, it's the type you borrow from somebody beat it, and say wow not too shabby....

Harder Faster Stronger
Profile: member
More Information

Thanks for the welcome :)

Rich and Chocolatey
Profile: old hand
More Information

FrozenGpu wrote :

It really isn't too bad of a game, just not a game I'd ever buy, it's the type you borrow from somebody beat it, and say wow not too shabby....




I actually like it a lot, I bought it and i'm playing through it for the fourth time now

Right now i'm playing on Delta with no silencers, iron sights only and no cloaking. It actually makes the game really challenging at times because you can't cheat with no cloak, lol

I think the game is way too easy with cloaking, and if you really want a challenge you have to just not use cloaking at all. Cloaking just messes with the AI too much and can trivialize quite a bit of the scenarios. I guess you could say that playing no cloak/iron sights makes it a lot more like playing Far Cry 1, really.

Just my two frames' worth.
Profile: Graphic Gorilla
More Information

FrozenGpu wrote :

Monsta sorry didn't know you had such a change of heart b/c as i recall and everybody else will, you started off trolling quite a bit, spouting off such nonsense left and right...

Glad to see you have some reason in you, welcome to the forums! :D



Good to see ya' playing nice. Everyone gets a chance to make a few mistakes.

And..., it's not like that stuff matters, cuz everyone knows Matrox is Numero UNO !! [:thegreatgrapeape:8]

Anywhoo, interesting watching the vids, but funny when he freaks out about never seeing the framerate before, but if he lowered the AA he'd likely get similar frames in a lesser solution if it were GPU-bound. But still pretty sweet.

I was kinda thinking why didn't he plug 3 of these in his rig instead, he's obviously not afraid to use a bit of the liquid;
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6814143143

Anywhoo, I enjoy Crysis enough that it was pretty entertaining watching that stretch, but you could still see that even with TriSLi the rig got stressed a fair amount with alot of time spent in the 30s and a few dips into the 20s. It's not really evident whether it's the CPU or the GPU that's the biggest culprit. I would think it's the CPU considering that the most stressful visual effects didn't affect framerate much, but the frames dropped considerably when actions were take, which would lead me to believe that the increased CPU overhead was the culprit.


---------------
You need a license to buy a gun, but they'll sell anyone a stamp (or internet account) - RED GREEN. GA to SK
HD Freedom: 45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2

Rich and Chocolatey
Profile: old hand
More Information

TheGreatGrapeApe wrote :

I was kinda thinking why didn't he plug 3 of these in his rig instead, he's obviously not afraid to use a bit of the liquid;
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6814143143



I always wondered that myself, but I just assumed it was because he might use them in his son's rig which might not be watercooled - i'm really not sure, thats just a guess.


Quote :

Anywhoo, I enjoy Crysis enough that it was pretty entertaining watching that stretch, but you could still see that even with TriSLi the rig got stressed a fair amount with alot of time spent in the 30s and a few dips into the 20s. It's not really evident whether it's the CPU or the GPU that's the biggest culprit. I would think it's the CPU considering that the most stressful visual effects didn't affect framerate much, but the frames dropped considerably when actions were take, which would lead me to believe that the increased CPU overhead was the culprit.




Its hard to say, you read my gtx260 SLI benchmarks I think; and I found it pretty odd how much of a hit Very High does have over High in terms of fps. I have pretty decent eyesight, and while I will admit that I do see some differences in Very High vs High - I do find it surprising that the framerate hit is so hard for a seemingly minor boost in IQ. Anyways, I get a feeling we might see some optimization here when Crysis Warhead comes out, they have discussed optimization a bit; but time will surely tell on that.

Profile: member
More Information

I wonder how many Fps he would get if AA if off

Profile: newbie
More Information

That is because he is running it on 1920 X 1200
but I know if he was running at 1400 X 900 it will be better FPS or even 1260 X 1080 he will have better FPS on CRYSIS.

Harder Faster Stronger
Profile: member
More Information