Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > Best price to performance ratio among different AMD 64 Athlon X2?

Best price to performance ratio among different AMD 64 Athlon X2?

Forum CPU & Components : CPUs - Best price to performance ratio among different AMD 64 Athlon X2?

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

There are loads of different CPUs with different speeds under the AMD 64 Athlon X2. Which one gives the best bang for the buck (both with and without overclocking)?

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

Black Edition 5400+ @ 2.8GHz\65W for under $100.

Reply to BaronMatrix

^agree

------------------------------ http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3073/2578392638_2827857d10_o.png
Reply to B-Unit

^agree
and you can easy clock it to 3.2 with proper cooler. (My 4800+ @2.5 is running @ 3.2Ghz whole year already).

Reply to yonef

is it better than the 6000+ in terms of performance? I would be using the stock cooler, so i dont know how much overclocking i would be able to do with the 5400+

Reply to theguitarfreak

My X2 5400+ went a tick more than 3GHz on stock volts. I got 3.2GHz with 1.375v (228 fsb). Temps were not an issue. The only 'issue' I really had was with the '7' memory divisor of the 5400+ ((3200MHz divided by 7 = 380 x 2 = 760MHz ram speed using the 333MHz ratio))

If you want 'headroom' to squeeze every bit of performance for 800MHz RAM speed at 3.2GHz choose an X2 5600+ with an '8' memory divisor.

Reply to wisecracker

ma 5600+ does 3.2 on stock cooling. but i did it for the fun of it and din keep it more than a few hours.

but if u wan the best solution, i say go with 5000+ BE. its really one of the best x2 in ma opinion.it overclocks well. it gives ok performance without OCing but with more L2 and more speed 5600+ would better. i am not really fond or 6000+ or 6200+ due to its high power requirements

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by sarwar_r87 on 08-05-2008 at 04:12:51 PM
------------------------------ x2 5600+@2.8; 2GB RAM 800Mhz; xfx 9600GT xt; 320GB HDD; 420W thermaltake PSU
Reply to sarwar_r87

So the 5600+ would be better than the 6000+ ? But the 5600+ has 1MB L2 Cache while the 6000+ has 2MB

Reply to theguitarfreak

sarwar_r87 wrote :

ma 5600+ does 3.2 on stock cooling. but i did it for the fun of it and din keep it more than a few hours.

but if u wan the best solution, i say go with 5000+ BE. its really one of the best x2 in ma opinion.it overclocks well. it gives ok performance without OCing but with more L2 and more speed 5600+ would better. i am not really fond or 6000+ or 6200+ due to its high power requirements



What? They're both 2x512k L2. Only difference is the stock speed(2.6 vs 2.8). Dont know about other channels, but the Egg no longer has the 5000BE listed.

5600 vs 6000: 65nm vs 90nm, so the 6000 will run a bit warmer, and has the added L2, although most indications seem to say that L2 isn't as important for K8 procs.

------------------------------ http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3073/2578392638_2827857d10_o.png
Reply to B-Unit

B-Unit wrote :

What? They're both 2x512k L2. Only difference is the stock speed(2.6 vs 2.8). Dont know about other channels, but the Egg no longer has the 5000BE listed.

5600 vs 6000: 65nm vs 90nm, so the 6000 will run a bit warmer, and has the added L2, although most indications seem to say that L2 isn't as important for K8 procs.




The 5400+ is now the X2 BE chip. That's actually better in that at stock you get DDR2-800 and I'm sure this is a new rev which should get a couple hundred more MHz. But it is STILL a 65W chip. If I had an AM2 mobo, I'd grab one.

Reply to BaronMatrix



So you are suggesting the 6000+ over the 5600+ ?


Message edited by theguitarfreak on 08-06-2008 at 02:16:29 PM
Reply to theguitarfreak

The Athlon X2 Black Edition processors do not come with a [stock] heatsink/fan. While they are excellent chips, they probably aren't the best "price/performance" Athlon X2s.

On newegg, you can get a retail 5000+ that comes with a heatsink for $66. The 5400+ BE costs $90, without a heatsink. The 6000+ costs $112, which means it would basically cost about the same as a 5400 BE + 3rd party heatsink. And as far as gaming performance goes, the 6000+ is a tad better (with its extra L2 cache) than even a higher clocked Brisbane. The downside is that it runs hotter and uses more power.

Reply to cusideabelincoln
Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > Best price to performance ratio among different AMD 64 Athlon X2?
Go to:

There are 1078 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them