All I have to add to this is a comment about latency. First, the "latency" issue with larger monitors of the non-tn type is two fold - first there is the response time, which has to do with ghosting, and second there is the FPS lag, which has to do with a delay between when a picture is sent to the monitor and when it is actually displayed. I am clarifying this because one above poster confused the two. As for the delay in displaying the picture (the 1-2 fps difference people are talking about), I would caution anyone against relying on other people's opinions on the matter. Just because one person swears that they've compared the monitors and there is no way to notice the 2 frame delay doesn't mean you won't notice it; people have different eyes and different expectations, so you may be sorely mislead if you trust one posters opinion that the frame delay in larger non-tn monitors is impossible to see. And to the others insisting that they are right and that it's a myth, get a grip and a better perspective; clearly some people CAN see the difference, just like some people CAN see ghosting on ~10ms response time monitors and some people CAN see tearing in non-vertical-sync modes. Myself, I don't see ghosting unless the response time is above 16 or so (though ratings differ in how they are assessed) and I can't see tearing in a moving image, but I CAN see a delay of a few frames in certain LCDs, and it's annoying. That doesn't mean everyone else will have the same experience, of course!