Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question

Which is better overall E8400 or Q6600 for a non-overclocker

Last response: in CPUs
Share
August 7, 2008 3:40:10 PM

Which is better overall E8400 or Q6600
I am not into overclocking!
If I plan to leave both options stock with the stock Intel cooler which is better overall?

NB: I know if one overclocks a Q6600 to 3.0GHZ+ it is obviously better than a E8400 at the same 3.0GHZ
August 7, 2008 3:56:49 PM

It depends on what you are using your computer for. Clock for clock even if a Q6600 is run at the same speed as a E8400 the E8400 will still be faster in single threaded programs that dont take advantage of multiple cores becuase it has more cache 1 mb more per core.

Anonymous
a b à CPUs
a b K Overclocking
August 7, 2008 3:58:25 PM

If you plan on gaming, the E8400 will be a much better choice since it runs 3ghz stock and it uses 45nm which make the E8400 generate less heat, If you plan on doing photoshop and encoding then the q6600 will be better
Related resources
August 7, 2008 4:02:44 PM

i would go quad because more and more games r taking advantage of more cores. so u would be future proof thats y i picked up the q6600. i have mine oc 3.0ghz at only 34c idle 45c load stays cool. even tho ur not oc i would still recommend the quad. when 4 cores r being utilized i dont care how much the 8400 is oc it cant take down the quad.
August 7, 2008 4:05:26 PM

on the other hand,and just to muddy the waters a bit,more and more proggies,including games will/are going to take advantage of multi cores,like alan wake,for instance,probably by early next year we will see more of this trend,,kinda hard not to overclock when one has a cpu that can take it,,eh what??:>)
August 7, 2008 4:05:34 PM

E8400 will outperform Q6600 in most games. If you do lots of encoding or rendering then go with the quad.
August 7, 2008 4:08:35 PM

What do you plan on using the chip for?
August 7, 2008 4:14:07 PM

can't the stock fan hold out for a while or what is a cheaper option for a coolin fan (supremelaw)
August 7, 2008 4:19:00 PM

stock fan is fine if you do not overclock. You can even do limited overlocks with a stock fan, aftermarket fans are good and are great/basically required for series OC but if you are only runnin stock they are all overkill.

Aslong as you correctly install the push pins by checking the backside of the motherboard that the pins went all the way through and are locked stock fans do there job.
August 7, 2008 4:26:55 PM

+1 for E8400. Its cooler, higher FSB, does better in every current game including the Unreal 3 engine and a lot of games in the near future will use it. It also has SSE4 insrtuctions which future games will use and will bring another nice performance boost.

I own a E8400 and am extremely pleased with it.
August 7, 2008 4:30:55 PM

Stock fan is fine even if you mildly overclock. Theres no reason not to mildly overclock, most boards ave a oc profile built in to the bios or come with software to overclock. As long as you dont go over 3.2 on either one you'll be fine.
August 7, 2008 5:15:02 PM

if this is only a 3 year build go for the dual core. if you want it to be viable in 5 years get the quad.

5 year plan would be to use the stock fan for the first 3 years, then replace with decent cooling fan and lots o ram so you can overclock it then. you may not want to OC now, but in 3 years when you can jump from 2.4-3.6Ghz for the cost of a cooler you'll want to.
August 7, 2008 5:30:47 PM

In this case where it will be all stock..

To save some cash, the E8400. Just make sure you get a decent MB, so you can perhaps upgrade to a quad later (45nm quad).

On a side note on heat, my Q6600 doesn't run any hotter then my E4400 doing normal stuff, although I'm not using a stock HSF.
!