8800 gts 640 low fps performance
Tags:
Last response: in Graphics & Displays
Hi
I'm trying to run Company of Heroes with everything maxed but it lags
I just upgraded to vista and was looking forward to run Company of Heroes with directx 10 :-(
here is my specs:
Motherboard: Gigabyte ga-p35-ds3r
CPU: Intel core 2 quad
Graphic: Inno3d 8800 gts 640 mb
Ram: 4 gb corsair dominater
Audio: x-fi extreme music
what is wrong? even tested my computers setup at nvidias "can you run it" and it was way better then optimal marker it hited the roof....so it beats my I don't run it?
Plz help :-)
I'm trying to run Company of Heroes with everything maxed but it lags
I just upgraded to vista and was looking forward to run Company of Heroes with directx 10 :-(
here is my specs:
Motherboard: Gigabyte ga-p35-ds3r
CPU: Intel core 2 quad
Graphic: Inno3d 8800 gts 640 mb
Ram: 4 gb corsair dominater
Audio: x-fi extreme music
what is wrong? even tested my computers setup at nvidias "can you run it" and it was way better then optimal marker it hited the roof....so it beats my I don't run it?
Plz help :-)
More about : 8800 gts 640 low fps performance
I also have a 8800 gts 640... and it completely owns... but it still can't play some games max... for one... the can u run it sucks... it says I can play crysis at max... WHICH I CANT... so don't believe that
what i'm pissed about is I had my gpu stable at core:shader:memory @ 650/1700/1000
and now its not stable UNLESS its @ default settings... so from that alone I lose 30 % in almost every single game... so i'm pretty ticked off about that... cause if it was heat related... I should beable to just oc it a lil less... but it idles @ 52.... and loads at like 65... so its not heat related in my opinion...
I don't know what to do... the 8800 gts 640 plays most games max... but not all... and I think company of heroes is one of them... and thats w/o direct x 10... adding that it just makes it even harder for the old 8800 gts 640
what i'm pissed about is I had my gpu stable at core:shader:memory @ 650/1700/1000
and now its not stable UNLESS its @ default settings... so from that alone I lose 30 % in almost every single game... so i'm pretty ticked off about that... cause if it was heat related... I should beable to just oc it a lil less... but it idles @ 52.... and loads at like 65... so its not heat related in my opinion...
I don't know what to do... the 8800 gts 640 plays most games max... but not all... and I think company of heroes is one of them... and thats w/o direct x 10... adding that it just makes it even harder for the old 8800 gts 640
Well, the early GTS (320mb, 640mb) really arent that great. I mean its a fine card but the G92 cards slay it. However Company of Heroes isnt all that new, but then again you are trying to run it in DX10 at max, and I dont see the G80 GTS capable of that, not even a G92. Early DX10 games have horrible optimization, ill blame it on the software before I blame it on the card.
Related ressources
- Low FPS with 8800 GTS 640 - Forum
- low fps with 8800 gts 640 mb - Forum
- 8800GTS 640 MB SLI Performance ? Who has this setup? - Forum
- Why is it that the 320 mb 8800gts beats the 640 mb one in performance ? - Forum
- 8800GTS 640 mb. Poor performance . - Forum
Vista, from my experience, runs games a little slower than XP. Simply because Vista eats up more resources.
I ran Company of Heroes with my setup (below in signature) without a problem. Far as I recall, it's all maxed. Not sure if I played it DX9 or DX10 honestly. And at that time I only had 2GB of RAM, where as I now have 4GB.
Here's the reality. Vista and DX10 both eat resources. Although the 8800GTS (G80) is a decent card, DX10 simply takes a lot of resources. All the current titles that truly run DX10 tax all the video cards.
So if you're running an avg of 23FPS @ max everything on DX10 I'd say you're doing just right.
I ran Company of Heroes with my setup (below in signature) without a problem. Far as I recall, it's all maxed. Not sure if I played it DX9 or DX10 honestly. And at that time I only had 2GB of RAM, where as I now have 4GB.
Here's the reality. Vista and DX10 both eat resources. Although the 8800GTS (G80) is a decent card, DX10 simply takes a lot of resources. All the current titles that truly run DX10 tax all the video cards.
So if you're running an avg of 23FPS @ max everything on DX10 I'd say you're doing just right.
Bigzer said:
what should i turn down....without loosing too much sweetness :-) what is AA? what does it do?AA = Anti-Aliasing
It makes the edges of objects appear more smooth, thus creating a "sharper" image. It taxes the video card more than most things I think. Though that is affected by driver versions and stuff too.
I usually find that in most games I can reduce "Shadows" and get decent FPS gains, without really losing much in the way of overall graphical splendor.
I'm at work, so I can't look at the CoH settings options. But, if there's options for how long dead bodies show, or how many, you can usually reduce those and save a little bit.
Try reducing Shadows if possible, and perhaps reduce AA to a lower number. You'll notice decent FPS gains I'd guess.
Settings in Vista itself probably won't affect things much. Far as I know, but I'm kinda new to Vista myself. What can help though is turning off as much background stuff as you can. So, if you've got Quickbooks or some other useless program that's loaded into memory in the backyard (or in your taskbar) shut it down.
Overclocking can help, but probably not by any "substantial" margins.
Let's say overclocking your video card yields a 15% increase in FPS (this is an example only). You'd go from an average of 23FPS to 26.45FPS (23*1.15=26.45) So unless you can pull off a huge OC, you probably won't see a large increase. That won't even necessarily give you a 3FPS increase in every game either.
Overclocking shouldn't hurt your performance, but you'll probably not see anything huge for results. Your best bet to increase performance is either A) Upgrade video card, or B) reduce graphic settings in the game.
Overclocking can help, but probably not by any "substantial" margins.
Let's say overclocking your video card yields a 15% increase in FPS (this is an example only). You'd go from an average of 23FPS to 26.45FPS (23*1.15=26.45) So unless you can pull off a huge OC, you probably won't see a large increase. That won't even necessarily give you a 3FPS increase in every game either.
Overclocking shouldn't hurt your performance, but you'll probably not see anything huge for results. Your best bet to increase performance is either A) Upgrade video card, or B) reduce graphic settings in the game.
This is not a problem with your card, it is a problem with CoH. CoH for DX10 is horribly optimized. What you're getting for frame rates is perfectly normal. If you switch back to DX9 you'll see those rates double at least. To be honest the graphical difference is not worth it. I owned that same card you have, then bought one of the new GTSs, and now I have a 4850 and all of them have trouble in CoH in DX10. It's not worth it, trust me.
Related ressources:
- Forum8800GTS 320MB vs 640 MB. (Price Vs. Performance ).
- ForumOMFG LOW FPS WITH 8800GTS 640 MB
- Forum8800GTS Bioshock - Low FPS !?
- ForumDrop in performance with 8800 GTS 640 need help
- ForumUpgrade from 8800 GTS 640 MB
- Forum8800 GTS 640 mb SLI vs GTX 560-Ti Help!!!
- Forum8800GTS 640 MB for Physx with GTX460?
- Forum8800gts 640 mb SLI help on CS:S
- Forum8800gts 640 upgrade
- ForumWhich is better 8800gts 320mb or 8800gts 640 mb?
- Forum8800GTS 640 vs 8800 GTX?
- ForumNo POST with new video card
- Forum8800 gts 320mb
- ForumZotac 8800GTS 512 AMP and XFX 8800 GTS 512mb G92 Alpha Dog Edition
- Forum$$$$ versus performance: second 8800 320mb or single 4850?
- More resources
Read discussions in other Graphics & Displays categories
!
)