Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > Q9450 or Q9400? worth the money?

Q9450 or Q9400? worth the money?

Forum CPU & Components : CPUs - Q9450 or Q9400? worth the money?

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

i read some reviews that said the Q9400 is better and i read some that said the Q9450 is :heink:
so can someone give me a the final answer?
leave the price different,like how much % different there is to wich 1

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

The 9450 is definitely better - it has 12MB of cache instead of the 6MB of the 9400.

Reply to cjl

The Q9450 has twice the L2 Cache at 12mb (q9400 has 6mb) so naturally it will be better.

With current pricing, personall i would go with the Q6600, yes its slower and cache is at 8mb (between the 2 others) and yes its still on 65nm compared to 45nm. But it will Overclock to equivilent speeds of the other 2 at ~$100 less cost.

------------------------------ "This thread made me strap on my lolerskates and head for my roflcopter."
Reply to chookman

this is a no brainer... Q9550 FTW :)
$324.00 Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 Yorkfield 2.66GHz @newegg

$329.00 Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 Yorkfield 2.83GHz 12MB @newegg

Reply to grieve

q9400 is new stepping? it might make it better overclocker and cooler running is not the E0?

------------------------------ http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h138/4rothrocks/WarpedSystemsAnimation-1.jpg
Reply to dragonsprayer

So the Q9400 is better than the Q9450.
I think that the Q9400 is actually replacing the Q9450 even if it has onlty 6MB cache.
It's not easy to get the Q9450.
I searched on Ebay there are few offering it.
the Q9400 is much more available.

So maybe the Q9400 has a little advantage on the Q9450 in term of performance.

Reply to lee-gamer

If you're near a Fry's Electronics, they may have the Q9540 for $269 (retail box). I picked up one last week. Today they have the Q9400 w/cheapo ECS mobo for $249.

I bought the Q9450 and it's a decent overclocker. Can't get over 450 FSB though (tried 2 procs and P45 and P35). Supposedly someone got the Q9400 to 4.0.

Under $300, I'd think they're all right for the price. I bought my Q6600 when it was that much. If this will be your first quad then consider the Q6600, they're around $175 now.

------------------------------ Asus PQ5 Deluxe | Intel Q9550 @4.08 Ghz | Swiftech Apogee Drive, 3 Rad | Ballistix 8500 | ATI 4850 Crossfire | CoolerMaster HAF
Reply to cd14

lee-gamer wrote :

So the Q9400 is better than the Q9450.
I think that the Q9400 is actually replacing the Q9450 even if it has onlty 6MB cache.
It's not easy to get the Q9450.
I searched on Ebay there are few offering it.
the Q9400 is much more available.

So maybe the Q9400 has a little advantage on the Q9450 in term of performance.


Nope - the 9450 is definitely better than the 9400. The only difference between the two is cache, and the 9450 has twice as much of it.

Reply to cjl
Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > Q9450 or Q9400? worth the money?
Go to:

There are 1053 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them