I'm trying to decide between a q6600, q9400 & q9550 (would be OC'ing on all). With the great results that people get overclocking the q6600, is it really worth the extra $80 for the q9400 or $135 for the q9550? Budget is a big concern but I'm more concerned about getting a processor that will last me a while. Computer will be used for moderate gaming and everyday tasks.
Dual core E8500 for 75% + gaming (OC'd to ~3.4), Q6600 (Oc'd to ~3.0) for some games, web surfing, and media editing on a budget, and Q9450 for games/media editing/everything no budget. The extra $100 for 9400/9550 etc. is luxury.
Look i have the q9400 its is ultra fast and i would highly recommend it, and its not to expensive and its good chip. It will play most games at full res and anti a and all i have is a Q9400, Ati radeon 3870, p5n-e mb , 650 w psu, 4gb DDr2 800 and normal Hdd.
If budget is the concern i would be getting the Q6600.... In the same vain if its budget why a 780i board? if you want SLI in the future 750 would be just as good, if no SLI P45 is cheaper and more stable.
------------------------------"This thread made me strap on my lolerskates and head for my roflcopter."
Reply to chookman
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.