Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > Pci 16x 1.1 bottleneck?
Word :    Username :           
 

Hey guys i just recently built a pc with a http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6813128078 and a radeon 4850 graphics card. It works perfectly!!! The connection is a 16x 1.1.

My problem is im going to upgrade it with a 4870x2 when it comes out in the next few weeks. Will the 1.1 interface of the MOBO bottleneck it? (i dont care about a few fps) or will it be fine?

Thanks tom hardware junkies!

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

i think it'll be fine for the most part. I'm not sure tho

Reply to johoz

I'm guessing you'd lose a few fps, especially in Crysis and especially at 1920x1200 or more. Still, based on benchmarks I've seen, the 4870x2 can deliver more than 60fps almost anywhere, and lots of LCD monitors can't display more than that anyway. No worries there.

What kind of PSU do you have?

Reply to aevm

The biggest thing is that can pci 1.1 deliver enough power for the 4870x2?
It draws so much power... Can those extra power connectors deliver enough power, when the pci 2.0 is not helping.
I have old amd ddr based board with reasonable good cpu, so that is not problem, but power can be...

Reply to hannibal

I expect it will work. Here's the logic:

http://www.techreport.com/articles.x/15105/7
- shows 436W for an entire system with a DQ6 MB and a QX9650, at the wall socket. Allowing for 85% efficiency (they used a Silencer 750W), and at least 100W for the CPU+MB alone, this means the HD 4870X32 alone took less than 300W.

The PCI-E 1.1 slot itself delivers 75W. The card takes a 6-pin connector (75W) and an 8-pin connector (150W). In total, it can get up to 300W and needs less. That should do.

Reply to aevm

ye, as long as power is fine the system will run fine, best look around for some reviews of pci1.x and pci2.0 to see if there are any differences, i have not seen any real differences and not any that couldn't be explained with difference in platform.

------------------------------ I'm a git, deal with it.

Antec 1200,PC Power & Cooling 750,Gigabyte DS4-x48,Intel Q9550@3.4 W/Xigmatek S1283,8GB OCZ DDR2 800,ATI 4870X2,X-FI>CA 640C amp>Tannoy R300/Senn 595's
Reply to Strangestranger

hannibal wrote :

The biggest thing is that can pci 1.1 deliver enough power for the 4870x2?



Most PCIe 2.0 are only 2.0 for signalling and are still 75W power draw, both the ATi and nV PCIe 2.0 cards are designed to handle 75W at the connector.

Some slots might be able ot handle more, but there's little reason to design for that exclusively at this point.

------------------------------ You need a license to buy a gun, but they'll sell anyone a stamp (or internet account) - RED GREEN. GA to SK
HD Freedom: 45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2

Reply to TheGreatGrapeApe

it will be fine might be a "slight" bottleneck. u might lose a few fps but dont worry enjoy the card.
=]

------------------------------ intel core 2 quad q6600 @3.2ghz msi p6n diamond (X-FI Extreme sound) 6gig of OCZ+CoRSAIR oc 900mhz Nvidia gtx 260 sli @ 730/1465/1250
Lite-On Blue-ray Western Digital 7200rpm 500gb Antec 500 Earthwatt Window vista 64-bit
Reply to invisik
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > Pci 16x 1.1 bottleneck?
Go to:

There are 554 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them