Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > Asus advertising gtx280 DX10.1!?

Asus advertising gtx280 DX10.1!?

Forum Graphic & Displays : Graphics Cards - Asus advertising gtx280 DX10.1!?

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

G'day all,

yea. im confused... Is their a black sheep running amuck amongst the gtx280's? Referring to, http://www.asus.de/products.aspx?l [...] odelmenu=1 Asus is advertising their gtx280 as DX10.1, whats the go?

Thanks, Pete


Message edited by boju on 07-15-2008 at 04:08:37 PM
Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.
- 0 +

typo?? im assuming. is it possible to use dx10.1 on nvidia cards??

------------------------------ intel core 2 quad q6600 @3.2ghz msi p6n diamond (X-FI Extreme sound) 6gig of OCZ+CoRSAIR oc 900mhz Nvidia gtx 260 sli @ 730/1465/1250
Lite-On Blue-ray Western Digital 7200rpm 500gb Antec 500 Earthwatt Window vista 64-bit
Reply to invisik
- 0 +

lol nice find :)

------------------------------ Q6600@3.4+ TT V1 Cooler,SAPPHIRE HD 4870X2,ASUS MAXIMUS FORMULA,4GB OCZ DDR2 800,LG W2452V 1920x1200
Reply to Maziar
- 0 +

I figured as much lol. Asus must be in another dimension...

trouble is, this misconception has already reached here lol http://www.centrecom.com.au/catalo [...] s_id=32512

^ i buy stuff from there.. i dunno now, i might have to ring them in the next dimension. argh forgot the area number o_O whats the area code to the next dimension? anyone? ;P


Message edited by boju on 07-15-2008 at 04:27:58 PM
Reply to boju

Gotta sell 'em somehow right?

Reply to rodney_ws
- 0 +

Whats the deal with DX10.1 anyway, none of the cards today could even maxed DX10.0, lets alone 10.1

Reply to concrum

concrum wrote :

Whats the deal with DX10.1 anyway, none of the cards today could even maxed DX10.0, lets alone 10.1


DX10.1 is actually more efficient that DX10. See the Assassin's Creed fiasco.

Reply to homerdog

typo or an Asus hybrid card. DX10.1 is the holdover till DX11 next year I reckon.

Reply to maximiza

^Definitely a typo, but I wouldn't dismiss DX10.1 just yet.

Reply to homerdog
- 0 +

ya dx10.1 is much more efficient then dx10. anyway do u think nvidia could make there cards work with dx10.1 with a simple driver update or it can only be done by changing something in the architecture?

------------------------------ intel core 2 quad q6600 @3.2ghz msi p6n diamond (X-FI Extreme sound) 6gig of OCZ+CoRSAIR oc 900mhz Nvidia gtx 260 sli @ 730/1465/1250
Lite-On Blue-ray Western Digital 7200rpm 500gb Antec 500 Earthwatt Window vista 64-bit
Reply to invisik
- 0 +

hehe yea i feel you. Apparantly its rumoured that Asus maybe developing a gpu cumbustion v8 engine with straight out exhaust to run all of your favourite games hassle free at max settings in dx10.1. Though i warn u it may cost you at the pump and 99/100% you will grow old with hearing impaired

Reply to boju

invisik wrote :

ya dx10.1 is much more efficient then dx10. anyway do u think nvidia could make there cards work with dx10.1 with a simple driver update or it can only be done by changing something in the architecture?


No, DX10.1 support will require a new architecture.

Reply to homerdog
- 0 +

^ exactly, In other words microsoft screw us once again:). Tisk Tisk* Rushing their job....

------------------------------ Folding@HOME Team: 163116
http://pid.us.playstation.com//user/L1qu1dat1on.jpg
Lapped CPU
http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/501789.png
Reply to L1qu1d

^IIRC it was NVIDIA who requested that Microsoft 'dumb down' DX10.

Reply to homerdog

from what i have read here, dx10.1 is what dx10 was meant to be but yes, nvidia couldn't get everything working so demanded that they change it otherwise they wouldn't have had a dx10 card out yet, only ati would of and they couldn't have that

so technically, nvidia don't have a full dx10 card out, only dx9.

------------------------------ I'm a git, deal with it.

Antec 1200,PC Power & Cooling 750,Gigabyte DS4-x48,Intel Q9550@3.4 W/Xigmatek S1283,8GB OCZ DDR2 800,ATI 4870X2,X-FI>CA 640C amp>Tannoy R300/Senn 595's
Reply to strangestranger
- 0 +

Many people in the industry figured that 10.1 was just a minuscule improvement that wouldn't really matter. Nvidia basically agreed, hence the reason they didn't even bother with 10.1. Plus the fact that they like being lazy sometimes.

------------------------------ DFI DK P45 T2RS: e8400: TRUE 120: PowerColor 4870: OCZ Platinum 4GB (2 x 2GB) 1066: Zalman 1000w PSU
Reply to T8RR8R

concrum wrote :

Whats the deal with DX10.1 anyway, none of the cards today could even maxed DX10.0, lets alone 10.1



Just because the number is "higher" dosent mean it takes more resources or requires more hardware or whatever you are wanting to call it. 10.1 is a "revision/hotfix/patch/rework" of regular DX10, it kind of fine tunes and softens out some edges you could say.

------------------------------ http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/547515.png
Intel Xeon X3370 @3.6ghz Under Enzotech Extreme-X,EVGA GTX 285 SC, 4GB Mushkin Ascent eVCI @ 1066mhz, Gigabyte P45 UD3P
Reply to spathotan
- 0 +

DX10 hardware can't run DX10.1 stuff though, but DX10.1 can run DX10 stuff as is usually the case with newer hardware.

------------------------------ DFI DK P45 T2RS: e8400: TRUE 120: PowerColor 4870: OCZ Platinum 4GB (2 x 2GB) 1066: Zalman 1000w PSU
Reply to T8RR8R

spathotan wrote :

Just because the number is "higher" dosent mean it takes more resources or requires more hardware or whatever you are wanting to call it. 10.1 is a "revision/hotfix/patch/rework" of regular DX10, it kind of fine tunes and softens out some edges you could say.


Actually, as strangestranger pointed out, DX10.1 isn't so much a "revision/hotfix/patch/rework" as it is DX10 in its true form. And it is not insignificant.

Reply to homerdog
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > Asus advertising gtx280 DX10.1!?
Go to:

There are 1185 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them
  • 01:00 bew1075k won the Uniformed badge
  • 01:00 Parasitic won the Uniformed badge
  • 01:00 X3no won the Uniformed badge
  • 01:00 Siq won the Uniformed badge
  • 01:00 wayspooled won the Uniformed badge
  • 01:00 chris62 won the Freshman badge
  • 01:00 Tattysnuc won the Freshman badge
  • 01:00 gamerk316 won the Freshman badge
  • 05:23 jsc won the Overclocking badge
  • 01:00 rolli59 won the Spy badge