Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > 9800 GTX+, where is it?
Word :    Username :           
 
Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

in my pants. Oo!!!

Reply to fugben

Who would buy an inferior product for the same amount of money as the targeted "competition"? Better yet, what retailer would even bother carrying this.

We know it wont beat the 4850 in preice/performance ratio, and if it does then wtf is the point of the GTX 260.


Message edited by spathotan on 07-16-2008 at 08:51:22 PM
------------------------------ http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/547515.png
Intel Xeon X3370 @3.6ghz Under Enzotech Extreme-X,EVGA GTX 285 SC, 4GB Mushkin Ascent eVCI @ 1066mhz, Gigabyte P45 UD3P
Reply to spathotan

Maybe Nvidia changed their mind and will come out with a GTX 260+ instead.

Reply to SinisterMessiah

EVGA has a "Pre-Order" of theirs under the nine-series... About 4 down on the list for $199.99 if it interests you. The specs didn't seem all that impressive, but what do I know? lol.

Reply to BigElectricCat

Quote :

We know it wont beat the 4850 in preice/performance ratio

 

Nvidia may have spoilt the party somewhat for ATI with the 9800+ GTX coming in at a similar price tag to the 4850. Also Looks like a better option than the ATI because of The Physics X and it seems to at least match or outperform the 4850.

 

http://www.legitreviews.com/article/731/1/

 

Unless I was spending the extra on the 4870, Nvidia's 9800GTX + looks like an awesome card for the money.


Message edited by speedbird on 07-18-2008 at 11:03:19 PM
Reply to speedbird

Except that the 9800GTX+ isn't out yet, is slightly slower in most tests (close enough not to matter though), and the 4850 is already down to a pretty consistent $150-$160 after rebate. The cheapest 9800GTX on newegg right now goes for $175 after rebate, and most are still at $200. Keep in mind the GTX+ has a MSRP of $30 more than the GTX, and it isn't available yet either. Also, the 9800 needs a pair of PCI-E power plugs, while the 4850 needs only one.

 

Basically, it isn't an awesome card for the money, because it will be at least $50 more than the 4850 when it finally shows up, and certainly isn't available (much less easily available in any kind of volume) yet. As for PhysX? ATI is getting it too.


Message edited by cjl on 07-18-2008 at 11:34:46 PM
Reply to cjl

The 9800GTX+ is out, just hard to find.
http://www.evga.com/products/moreI [...] s%20Family

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by sabot00 on 07-18-2008 at 11:41:28 PM
Reply to sabot00

Here in the UK I've seen the 9800GTX+ going for £129inc VAT pre-order on one site. The gap in price between the 9800GTX+ and the ATI 4850 is pretty small then that's considering the Nvidia has Physics X on board. The review site I posted shows the 9800GTX+ and 4850 being neck and neck overall.

Doesn't ATI use something called havok for their physics? not physics X?

I probably wont be upgrading anytime soon, although I must admit it's mighty tempting with these prices. My 2900pro flashed to XT is still serving me well. My main problem I have with ATI is their drivers and this is one area I think nvidia is better at. I don't dislike ATI, but I've had better experiences with Nvidia.

Reply to speedbird


Note that that is a preorder.


Speedbird: Though there is no official support yet, the ATI 48xx series have been shown to be able to run PhysX, and Nvidia actually supports it. We'll have to see for sure, but I'd bet that they will have full support at some point not too far away.

Reply to cjl

when is it coming out does it really take that long to release a card with just a die shrink?

------------------------------ intel core 2 quad q6600 @3.2ghz msi p6n diamond (X-FI Extreme sound) 6gig of OCZ+CoRSAIR oc 900mhz Nvidia gtx 260 sli @ 730/1465/1250
Lite-On Blue-ray Western Digital 7200rpm 500gb Antec 500 Earthwatt Window vista 64-bit
Reply to invisik

Looks like it's possible to run Physics X on ATI, but AMD are not to keen so there's no guarantee of it being official. The 9800GTX+ for the time being ,saves the need for a separate physics X card and still performs similar in games, so for me it's the better card in that price range.

Reply to speedbird
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > 9800 GTX+, where is it?
Go to:

There are 687 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them