Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > The ATI Bandwagon...

The ATI Bandwagon...

Forum Graphic & Displays : Graphics Cards - The ATI Bandwagon...

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Page:    Previous 1 2 Next Bottom Search this thread
Word :    Username :           
 

[b]
OK - I feel like I need to jump on the ATI bandwagon... I'm sorry. But really, how much better can you get than a GTX 260 for around $300? My games are played @ 1680 resolution and I like to max them out.

Here is my setup right now --

Vist64 | EVGA 780i | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 @ 3.2 | XFX GTX260 | (2x2GB) 4GB Corsair XMS DDR2/800 | WD Caviar SE16 SATA 3GB/S | ZALMAN CNPS9700 | Antec Neo PS | ANTEC P182 Gun Metal | Samsung 22" G2G 2MS

Your honest opinions are appreciated.


Message edited by peter_peter on 07-23-2008 at 02:29:52 AM
------------------------------ Its not a bug. It's an undocumented feature.
Windows Vista 64bit | EVGA 780i SLI Mobo | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 Yorkfield @ 3.4 | XFX GTX 260 | (2x2GB) 4GB Corsair XMS DDR2| (3x320)WD Caviar SE16 SATA 3GB/S | ZALMAN CNPS9700 | Antec Neo PS | ANTEC P182SE
Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

At 300$, the 260 isnt a bad buy at all. Very nice card. Should leave you happy for awhile

------------------------------ I went drifting, thru the capitols of tin, where men cant walk and cant freely talk, and sons turn their fathers in
Reply to jaydeejohn

I think he was saying that the 4850 is better than the 260 jaydee...like my sig ? lol

------------------------------ E8500,GA-EP45-UD3R, 8 GIG MUSHKIN, XFX 4890 , ASUS 22", WD 640 X 2, CM 532, CM 650TX
Reply to royalcrown
- 0 +

jaydeejohn wrote :

At 300$, the 260 isnt a bad buy at all. Very nice card. Should leave you happy for awhile


Thats true, but 4870 cost same and have maybe little higher performance depending on games you play.

Reply to xrodney

My honest opinion is this, take the 260 out of your box and run over it with a steamroller. Or, you could keep it and remember that with that MoBo you will have the option at anytime to add another for some SLI action.

Take pictures if you run it over, though.

Reply to hairycat101

if you're really that determined, i'd say ebay your gtx 260 and put a buy it now of like 290 or so, and your ebay auction will fund your 4870 purchase.

------------------------------ Q6600 @ 3.6GHz|2GB Crucial Ballistix Tracer|DFI P965-S Dark|8800GT 512MB|Raptor Main Drive|Audigy X-Fi (Modded)|Rocketfish Case with H2O|

AMD Athlon X2 4800+ @ 2.7GHz|OCZ Golden Gamer @ 450MHz 2.5-3-2-5, 1T|250GB Main Drive|2900XT|NZXT Zero w/ h2o
Reply to lambofgode3x

4870 is 6% faster than GTX 260. THG reviewed both of them a while back, but if I were to get either one, I'd pick the GTX 260 due to more video memory.

Reply to pcgamer12

Like hairycat said - I also like the idea of going SLI like in a month or so... I wonder how two gtx260's perform... mmm . . .

------------------------------ Its not a bug. It's an undocumented feature.
Windows Vista 64bit | EVGA 780i SLI Mobo | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 Yorkfield @ 3.4 | XFX GTX 260 | (2x2GB) 4GB Corsair XMS DDR2| (3x320)WD Caviar SE16 SATA 3GB/S | ZALMAN CNPS9700 | Antec Neo PS | ANTEC P182SE
Reply to peter_peter

pcgamer12 wrote :

4870 is 6% faster than GTX 260. THG reviewed both of them a while back, but if I were to get either one, I'd pick the GTX 260 due to more video memory.



Yea... but... You have to keep in mind that the drivers really aren't that well developed for the 4XXX series yet. Heck, they don't even appear on the ATI website for driver downloads. With that in mind, they will likely improve in terms of performance when they get mature drivers.

Reply to hairycat101

lol. i waited for ati to unleash their dragons, i mean graphics card. :D

------------------------------ Q6600 @ 3Ghz | zalman 9700NT cooler | gigabyte P35-DS3L | Kingstone DDR2 667 2GB x 2 | HIS 4850HD with Accelero S1 Rev.2 | enermax Liberty 500w | Coolermaster C5 case |
Reply to night_wolf_in

Then again, drivers can improve in both camps.

Reply to pcgamer12

peter_peter wrote :

Like hairycat said - I also like the idea of going SLI like in a month or so... I wonder how two gtx260's perform... mmm . . .



Now that wasn't my first suggestion. I still like the steamroller idea. :pt1cable:

Reply to hairycat101

Nvidia usually has more mature drivers at first. Maybe the 8800 was the exception. =)

Reply to hairycat101

hairycat101 wrote :

Yea... but... You have to keep in mind that the drivers really aren't that well developed for the 4XXX series yet. Heck, they don't even appear on the ATI website for driver downloads. With that in mind, they will likely improve in terms of performance when they get mature drivers.



You can hold out hope for driver improvements, but that doesn't necessarily equate to more performance. I have noticed that with my 3870, the performance hasn't increased really at all. The 4XXX series probably will benefit some from driver improvements, but I don't think that they will be something to write home about.

------------------------------ Q9400 @ 3.4
Gigabyte EP45-UD3P
2x2 Corsair Dominator 1066
Crossfire ASUS TOP 4850's
Reply to cappster

Why is Nvidia so hated?

------------------------------ Its not a bug. It's an undocumented feature.
Windows Vista 64bit | EVGA 780i SLI Mobo | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 Yorkfield @ 3.4 | XFX GTX 260 | (2x2GB) 4GB Corsair XMS DDR2| (3x320)WD Caviar SE16 SATA 3GB/S | ZALMAN CNPS9700 | Antec Neo PS | ANTEC P182SE
Reply to peter_peter

ATI HD 4870 X2 is going to rely on drivers and CrossFire X profiles as new games are released.

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by pcgamer12 on 07-18-2008 at 08:40:07 PM
------------------------------ Intel Core 2 Duo E4600 2.4GHz| XFX 8800 GT 512MB | Crucial Ballistix DDR2 800 [1GB x 2] [4-4-4-12 2T] [2.2v] | Gigabyte GA-P35-DS3L | Arctic Cooling Freezer 7 Pro | Antec NeoHE 430W | Antec P150 case | Samsung SyncMaster 2053BW LCD monitor | Altec Lansing
Reply to pcgamer12
- 1 +

Its probably not worth it to switch over to the 4870. I would just stick with the 260. Enjoy that rig man.

Best,

3Ball

------------------------------ ASUS P5Q Pro P45 Motherboard
Intel C2Q Q9550 @ 3.40ghz w/ (8.5x400mhz, 1.2125v, Zalman 9500 & 24+ Hours Prime95 Stable)
6gb G. Skill DDR2 6400 @ 800mhz w/ (5-5-5-15: 2T, 2.04v)
EVGA GTX275 @ 660mhz/1550mhz/2400mhz
Reply to 3Ball

pcgamer12 wrote :

ATI HD 4870 X2 is going to rely on drivers and CrossFire X profiles as new games are released.



is it just me or does this really have nothing do to with this thread?

------------------------------ Q6600 @ 3.6GHz|2GB Crucial Ballistix Tracer|DFI P965-S Dark|8800GT 512MB|Raptor Main Drive|Audigy X-Fi (Modded)|Rocketfish Case with H2O|

AMD Athlon X2 4800+ @ 2.7GHz|OCZ Golden Gamer @ 450MHz 2.5-3-2-5, 1T|250GB Main Drive|2900XT|NZXT Zero w/ h2o
Reply to lambofgode3x

We were talking about drivers, I should have mentioned that single-gpu cards aren't affected as much by drivers as cards in SLI or CF. Do you understand now?

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by pcgamer12 on 07-18-2008 at 08:44:20 PM
Reply to pcgamer12

peter_peter wrote :

Why is Nvidia so hated?

 

Nvidia certainly isn't hated, it's just that they have been on top of the graphics market for quite a while. With ATI becoming a threat again, it's nice to see the underdog come back from behind.


Message edited by njalterio on 07-18-2008 at 08:51:19 PM
------------------------------ Take my love, take my land, take me where I cannot stand.
I don't care, I'm still free you can't take the sky from me.
Reply to njalterio

I agree with 3Ball. For a 6-10% performance increase it is really not worth disturbing a stable rig.

------------------------------ Take my love, take my land, take me where I cannot stand.
I don't care, I'm still free you can't take the sky from me.
Reply to njalterio

Is the gtx280 worth the Jump?

------------------------------ Its not a bug. It's an undocumented feature.
Windows Vista 64bit | EVGA 780i SLI Mobo | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 Yorkfield @ 3.4 | XFX GTX 260 | (2x2GB) 4GB Corsair XMS DDR2| (3x320)WD Caviar SE16 SATA 3GB/S | ZALMAN CNPS9700 | Antec Neo PS | ANTEC P182SE
Reply to peter_peter

pcgamer12 wrote :

We were talking about drivers, I should have mentioned that single-gpu cards aren't affected as much by drivers as cards in SLI or CF. Do you understand now?



yeah, its just that to me you didnt clearly state your point. which is why i was like :heink:

------------------------------ Q6600 @ 3.6GHz|2GB Crucial Ballistix Tracer|DFI P965-S Dark|8800GT 512MB|Raptor Main Drive|Audigy X-Fi (Modded)|Rocketfish Case with H2O|

AMD Athlon X2 4800+ @ 2.7GHz|OCZ Golden Gamer @ 450MHz 2.5-3-2-5, 1T|250GB Main Drive|2900XT|NZXT Zero w/ h2o
Reply to lambofgode3x

GTX 280 would definitely be worth the jump, but only if you have money to spare and/or get it through a step up program. Make sure your power supply is up for it too.

------------------------------ Take my love, take my land, take me where I cannot stand.
I don't care, I'm still free you can't take the sky from me.
Reply to njalterio

Check this out, Newegg is selling PNY GTX 280 for $419.99 after rebate. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6814133228

To see the price, you've got to add it to your cart. Although it does require a mail in rebate, $420 is a much better price than $649. ATI certainly brought their game to bring the GTX 280's price down $230 dollars.


Message edited by pcgamer12 on 07-18-2008 at 08:58:14 PM
Reply to pcgamer12

cappster wrote :

You can hold out hope for driver improvements, but that doesn't necessarily equate to more performance. I have noticed that with my 3870, the performance hasn't increased really at all. The 4XXX series probably will benefit some from driver improvements, but I don't think that they will be something to write home about.




You haven't noticed any driver improvements? What driver version are you using?
I have definitely noticed some better performance for the driver out now compared to the driver I used back when I got it in February. There have also been more graphics settings and anti aliasing options enabled in some games.

------------------------------ Take my love, take my land, take me where I cannot stand.
I don't care, I'm still free you can't take the sky from me.
Reply to njalterio

If you already have a GTX 260, there is no point. They are both close.

 

I got a 4870 because Nvidia's drivers suck for the 8800GTX on Vista 64, but the 260/80 drivers INF modded fixed allot(just not enough for me[and in a test my old X1900XT worked with all the games i was using], the 8800 will go on a XP machine for the rest of its life) so you should have no issues.


Message edited by nukemaster on 07-18-2008 at 09:20:12 PM
------------------------------ http://i33.tinypic.com/sw3a5y.png
http://tinyurl.com/26uxxb - C2/i7 Temp? http://tinyurl.com/cj3pw - VGA power?
http://tinyurl.com/5v55wk - C2 Mem performance? http://tinyurl.com/6pmbke - SLI/Xfire?
http://tinyurl.com/yfmxdc9 - Part Guide?
Reply to nukemaster

> Thanks Nuke... I guess I feel better with my GTX260 - I'm not the biggest gamer - but COD4 gots me hooked.

Any other good games similar or better than COD4?

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by peter_peter on 07-18-2008 at 10:44:03 PM
------------------------------ Its not a bug. It's an undocumented feature.
Windows Vista 64bit | EVGA 780i SLI Mobo | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 Yorkfield @ 3.4 | XFX GTX 260 | (2x2GB) 4GB Corsair XMS DDR2| (3x320)WD Caviar SE16 SATA 3GB/S | ZALMAN CNPS9700 | Antec Neo PS | ANTEC P182SE
Reply to peter_peter
- 0 +

Jesus man.

What are you thinking?

Your eyes wouldnt be able to tell the difference.

The 4850/4870 and GTX 260/280 are amazing cards all can play all games in high-very high at 720 and above.ATI did good and Nvidia did good.You'll be a fool to be disappointed from a power perspective.

Though Ati shot themselves in the foot, in exactly the same way Nvidia did with entire 9 series.(

512 vram is a bad idea unless your happy to upgrade GPu again with a new monitor.

I think Vram and memory bandwidth is everything with the high end cards. And a lack of it will cause many heartache over the coming 12-24 months when they get a bigger and better monitor.

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by dos1986 on 07-18-2008 at 11:00:37 PM
Reply to dos1986

My 8800GTS (G92) owns CoD4, your GTX260 is probably bored with it. Granted I only play at 1440x900. If you've already spend the dough, and have the 260, you're just losing money to get rid of it and buy anything else.

Stick with it, and be glad your video card is way better than mine. ;)

------------------------------ i5-750 @ 2.66Ghz / Gigabyte GA-P55-UD4P / Xigmatek HDT-S1283 (Waiting for Bracket)
2 x MSI GTX 260 Core 216 SLI (655Mhz) / 4GB GSkill DDR3 1600 9-9-9-24 @1.5v
2 x WD Caviar Black 1TB / Thermaltake Armor BWS8003
Win 7 64bit / Antec TPQ-850
Reply to jerreece
- 0 +

dos1986 wrote :

Jesus man.

What are you thinking?

Your eyes wouldnt be able to tell the difference.

The 4850/4870 and GTX 260/280 are amazing cards all can play all games in high-very high at 720 and above.ATI did good and Nvidia did good.You'll be a fool to be disappointed from a power perspective.

Though Ati shot themselves in the foot, in exactly the same way Nvidia did with entire 9 series.(

512 vram is a bad idea unless your happy to upgrade GPu again with a new monitor.

I think Vram and memory bandwidth is everything with the high end cards. And a lack of it will cause many heartache over the coming 12-24 months when they get a bigger and better monitor.


Keep in mind that a 1GB 4870 has always been planned, and should be out shortly. As for memory bandwidth, the 4870 has it in huge quantities - it's called GDDR5.

Reply to cjl
- 0 +

If you already got the GTX260 then the card should be very good but i would go with the 4870.
http://www.tomshardware.com/review [...] ,1964.html

Reply to sabot00

If I was going to buy an ATI card around this time I would wait for the 4870x2 to peep it's head out.

Reply to SpinachEater

peter_peter wrote :

>Any other good games similar or better than COD4?

 

You may like Rainbow 6 Vegas and Vegas 2. I also found MOH: Airborne fun.

 

There are lots of shooters out with decent single player(if you are into that part of the game).

 

And if you ever feel like pointless killing, Serious Sam II can be fun.

 

Once again, the 2 cards to trade blows(almost depends on what you play), and the drivers are new for both, so they may get even better in the future.

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by nukemaster on 07-19-2008 at 12:42:46 AM
------------------------------ http://i33.tinypic.com/sw3a5y.png
http://tinyurl.com/26uxxb - C2/i7 Temp? http://tinyurl.com/cj3pw - VGA power?
http://tinyurl.com/5v55wk - C2 Mem performance? http://tinyurl.com/6pmbke - SLI/Xfire?
http://tinyurl.com/yfmxdc9 - Part Guide?
Reply to nukemaster
- 0 +

night_wolf_in wrote :

lol. i waited for ati to unleash their dragons, i mean graphics card. :D



If I'd have known, I would not have spent $449 on a 3870x2 the first week of last February. I would have waited for the 4870x2. Not that I have a bad card, it compares favorably to the 4850 and runs my games nicely.

I just hate spending that much money and seeing the next generation out in six months, as I usually only buy a new card every 1-2 years.

That said, the next ATI series is expected something like early 2009. So, I think I'll skip this generation after all.

To the OP, I did not feel the need to jump on the Nvidia bandwagon when the best of the 8800 series outperformed ATI in Crysis. I like ATI image quality and AVIVO, as I do more than just game with my PC.

If you really like Nvidia, then stick with them and go GTX260. I'm one fanboy who does not mind other fanboy's their toys. The only thing I mind in the realm of fanboyism is insistence that everyone must switch depending on whatever incremental improvements are made in any particular generation.

ATI and Nvidia have been leapfrogging each other in performance for generations. I did not like the budget Nvidia platform I had when I upgraded from a P4 Northwood on an i865PERL. That platform was a 405 chipset with a 7600gs and my current CPU (which I moved to an ATI mobo when I got the 3870x2).

If you like your higher end Nvidia platform and enjoy SLI, then go for it. You do not need to be on anyone's bandwagon but your own. Get the tech you enjoy and we should all stick to facts, not fiction, when critiquing tech from the companies we don't normally buy.


------------------------------ Phenom 8750, ASUS M3A78T
4 gigs Kingston DDR2 800 two 1T SAMSUNG HD103UI
Sapphire 4870x2, Sony BDU-X10S BD-ROM
Antec Neo 650 PSU Antec Nine Hundred, Acer H213H 1080p LCD
Reply to yipsl
- 0 +

nukemaster wrote :

You may like Rainbow 6 Vegas and Vegas 2. I also found MOH: Airborne fun.

There are lots of shooters out with decent single player(if you are into that part of the game).

And if you ever feel like pointless killing, Serious Sam II can be fun.

Once again, the 2 cards to trade blows(almost depends on what you play), and the drivers are new for both, so they may get even better in the future.




Of course, for pointless killing, you can't miss UT3 :D

Reply to cjl

Yeah there is that too. I Play that too.

Sam II is just so much more pointless. Wave after wave of baddies. Where else can you send a bird with a bomb hanging from its neck at someone(this is in single player) :)

I also like the co op mode with friends.

------------------------------ http://i33.tinypic.com/sw3a5y.png
http://tinyurl.com/26uxxb - C2/i7 Temp? http://tinyurl.com/cj3pw - VGA power?
http://tinyurl.com/5v55wk - C2 Mem performance? http://tinyurl.com/6pmbke - SLI/Xfire?
http://tinyurl.com/yfmxdc9 - Part Guide?
Reply to nukemaster
- 0 +

nukemaster wrote :

Yeah there is that too. I Play that too.

Sam II is just so much more pointless. Wave after wave of baddies. Where else can you send a bird with a bomb hanging from its neck at someone(this is in single player) :)

I also like the co op mode with friends.


True. Of course, I've never seen quite as much mayhem as when you start unloading with a flak cannon in the middle of a mob...

Reply to cjl

pcgamer12 wrote :

4870 is 6% faster than GTX 260. THG reviewed both of them a while back, but if I were to get either one, I'd pick the GTX 260 due to more video memory.



more video memory isn't going to mean much, b/c the bandwidth of the gddr5 is very high, so high it doesn't hit the same limitations that more memory of higher bit buses do for gddr3 memory, so ur VP is a little naive..

Reply to FrozenGpu
- 0 +

FrozenGpu wrote :

more video memory isn't going to mean much, b/c the bandwidth of the gddr5 is very high, so high it doesn't hit the same limitations that more memory of higher bit buses do for gddr3 memory, so ur VP is a little naive..



Regarding video memory, more memory should help the 4850, as it still uses GDDR3. There's supposedly going to be a 2 gigabyte version by Powercolor:

http://www.tweaktown.com/news/9809 [...] index.html

The 3xxx series reaches EOL this quarter as the 4400 and 4600 are expected to arrive soon:

http://www.nordichardware.com/news,7948.html

It would be great to see a 4400 as fast as a 3850 and a 4600 as fast as a 3870. That should help the low end compete against Nvidia quite well.

cjl wrote :

True. Of course, I've never seen quite as much mayhem as when you start unloading with a flak cannon in the middle of a mob...



I've always preferred CRPGs, and am playing LOTRO mostly nowadays. My 45 lvl minstrel can only hit 3 opponents at one time with call of orome or the equivalent legendary trait based light attack.

With mobs of elites that respawn incredibly fast, there are times when I miss the old meteor shower or star shower from the classic Might and Magics!


Message edited by yipsl on 07-19-2008 at 09:24:29 AM
------------------------------ Phenom 8750, ASUS M3A78T
4 gigs Kingston DDR2 800 two 1T SAMSUNG HD103UI
Sapphire 4870x2, Sony BDU-X10S BD-ROM
Antec Neo 650 PSU Antec Nine Hundred, Acer H213H 1080p LCD
Reply to yipsl
- 0 +

FrozenGpu wrote :

more video memory isn't going to mean much, b/c the bandwidth of the gddr5 is very high, so high it doesn't hit the same limitations that more memory of higher bit buses do for gddr3 memory, so ur VP is a little naive..


More video memory will still help, despite the high bandwidth. Look at the 4870x2 (2GB) vs 4870CF (512/card) results at 1920x1200 and above with AA and you can see what I mean.

Reply to cjl

cjl wrote :

More video memory will still help, despite the high bandwidth. Look at the 4870x2 (2GB) vs 4870CF (512/card) results at 1920x1200 and above with AA and you can see what I mean.



umm those margins are very small though, you'd have to play at 2500*1600 in my most humblest opinion to take any real advantage...

Reply to FrozenGpu
- 0 +

They're only small in the areas that 512MB are sufficient. Look at this for example:

 

http://images.anandtech.com/reviews/video/ati/R700/GRID.jpg

 

Notice the nosedive that the CF 4870's take, while the x2 sits happily. The X2 gets more than DOUBLE the framerate at 2560x1600. Yes, this is higher than what most people play at now, but keep in mind that newer games tend to use more memory at the same resolution. I would bet that a 1GB 4870 would be a lot more futureproof than the 512 model.

Message quoted 2 times
Message edited by cjl on 07-19-2008 at 09:34:01 AM
Reply to cjl
- 0 +

FrozenGpu wrote :

umm those margins are very small though, you'd have to play at 2500*1600 in my most humblest opinion to take any real advantage...


1600x1200 resolution as highest sufficient resolution with 512MB video memory and even this maybe not enough if use high resolution textures etc.

Memory bandwith dont help you if all graphics needed just dont fit.

It all depend on game, if there are huge numbers of objects and efects in game even 8800GTX with 768MB is sometime not enough. For game with less graphics even 128MB could be enough.

Reply to xrodney

If one already has a GTX 260, then the money you'd lose to shipping costs and selling your old card for what you could get (which would be much less than what a new one on NewEgg is) would mean that you'd wind up having to pay a sizable chunk to "upgrade" to an HD 4870; I'd judge around 20-30% of the card's value. (or as much as $100US) Not exactly a brilliant idea for a sliver of performance. That's almost as bad as upgrading to the GTX 280, which would again be only two slivers more, but would likely wind up, in the end, setting you back several times as much.

However, I do agree that the thought of watching someone run over their own video card they paid like $330US for is amusing.

Reply to nottheking

cjl wrote :

They're only small in the areas that 512MB are sufficient. Look at this for example:

http://images.anandtech.com/review [...] 0/GRID.jpg

Notice the nosedive that the CF 4870's take, while the x2 sits happily. The X2 gets more than DOUBLE the framerate at 2560x1600. Yes, this is higher than what most people play at now, but keep in mind that newer games tend to use more memory at the same resolution. I would bet that a 1GB 4870 would be a lot more futureproof than the 512 model.



but still, you guys are completely missing the point, 1gb of vram, is still overkill for what most ppl's set-up even so at the highest res. the gtx260 is like 32.9, and the single 4870, is 43.9. [2500*1600]

now the gtx260 has more memory but clearly it doesn't do the card any good, so even though the 487 has 512 of memory that gddr5 bandwidth helps, and technically NVidia still has the upper hand in terms of actual SP, TMU's, and ROP's, so the ati card is more efficient in terms of the hardware it has and how it uses it to outperform the gtx260.

Now if the OP wants, he should just keep the gtx260 as it is overkill most the majority of the games out there, why go thru all that hassle just to have the best possible hardware in that scenario when software is still sooo far behind what leaps hardware has gone through...

Reply to FrozenGpu

Anyone that is going to tell you to upgrade from a gtx260 to a ati 4870 is on crack. Its a waste of money unless you are getting at least 300$ for your gtx260 which will cover the cost of the 4870.

Wait for the 4870x2 if you wish to make an upgrade, but going from a gtx260 to a 4870 would be underwhelming to say the least.

Reply to ovaltineplease
- 0 +

ovaltineplease wrote :

Anyone that is going to tell you to upgrade from a gtx260 to a ati 4870 is on crack. .




Alot of them around, seriously

Reply to dos1986
Previous
1 2
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > The ATI Bandwagon...
Go to:

There are 1169 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them