Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

AGP 2600pro

Last response: in Graphics & Displays
Share

I have a chance to buy an ati radeon 2600pro 512mb to upgrade an old system I have. I am really just a poor college student and I really want to play COD4, hah. So yeah, I would be upgrading from a radeon 9800pro 256mb card. Do note this is an AGP system, and with a weak 350watt power supply from what I remember.
My question is if getting a 2600pro for around $30 be a good buy and a good increase in power over my 9800pro? Will I be able to play COD4 at decent framerates? The last time I really gamed was with BF2 at 1280*1024 with around ~30fps with AA, and shadows and stuff off.

I think the specs were:
P4 2.53 ghz
1gb of DDR memory (should I get another gigabyte?)

More about : agp 2600pro

Related ressources

I think you might be disappointed by the results of the 2600 in COD4. I have one in an older Pentium D setup and it was barely playable. It was frustrating. So frustrating that I bit the bullet and bought a new motherboard and an 8800Gt. I would think that a 3850 in agp would give you acceptable rates and they can be had for around $100. My 2600 pro was a big let down. Just thought I would throw in my 2 cents.

May I ask what settings you were playing at, ie were you using AA or any other effects. I don't mind turning down the settings to achieve at least 30fps. I'm kind of used to play games at low quality.

I don't think I want to go through the trouble of upgrading my mobo because I mine as well do a whole build, which I don't have the money for. I am also worried about the power requirements of the 3850agp.

bluzman32 said:
May I ask what settings you were playing at, ie were you using AA or any other effects. I don't mind turning down the settings to achieve at least 30fps. I'm kind of used to play games at low quality.

I don't think I want to go through the trouble of upgrading my mobo because I mine as well do a whole build, which I don't have the money for. I am also worried about the power requirements of the 3850agp.


well by old 6200TC play it 25+ frames with texture on extra (very high) and rest on low @ 640*480 with 2xQ AA.

so i think the 2600 would to much better not max with 4aa but very playable with decent settings

ya, i never played a game below 800x600. All other settings were normal (2AA). And I have to say that I was playing online mostly. So maybe with settings low and low res in singleplayer it would be fine. I should have tested the single player but I was so disgusted with the multi that I gave the card to a friend.

Since then (about 2 months ago) I went wild on the credit card and got SLI with twin 9800GTX. Play everything great now.

Good luck.
Graphics card Expert

Your CPU will greatly limit the playable detail levels in COD4; It's a minimum spec CPU for that game. You'll be stuck at low details, which the 2600 pro should have no problem handling at almost any resolution. $30 I would go for it as it is a cheap price for so much added performance in many games. Just keep in mind the CPU will kill you in some games, COD4 unfortunately is one of them.
Ask the community
!