Hi all
I was wondering for an office environment where the main work will be database transactions on Windows XP, which processor would be better suited? Or would this task not matter much?
If there is no winner on performance, which would be better in terms of power efficiency or heat output? I've heard Prescotts with 1MB or 2MB cache are really bad, but Celerons are a different kettle of fish and apparently are OK in temperatures?
I see the Celeron D has more L1 cache, but less L2 cache and a lower FSB. However, it benefits from improved architectural design (http://www.anandtech.com/printarticle.aspx?i=2093). It also has SSE3 compared to none in the Pentium 4 and I've heard these are important considerations.
The cost is the same, so that's not an issue. I just don't know which to go for.. help me decide with this poll!
Thank you
I was wondering for an office environment where the main work will be database transactions on Windows XP, which processor would be better suited? Or would this task not matter much?
If there is no winner on performance, which would be better in terms of power efficiency or heat output? I've heard Prescotts with 1MB or 2MB cache are really bad, but Celerons are a different kettle of fish and apparently are OK in temperatures?
I see the Celeron D has more L1 cache, but less L2 cache and a lower FSB. However, it benefits from improved architectural design (http://www.anandtech.com/printarticle.aspx?i=2093). It also has SSE3 compared to none in the Pentium 4 and I've heard these are important considerations.
The cost is the same, so that's not an issue. I just don't know which to go for.. help me decide with this poll!
Thank you