Download the Tom's Hardware App from the App Store
The reference for current tech news
Yes No
Ads
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphics & Displays > AMD Radeon > Share your 4850/4870 Benchmarks w/ 8.7 drivers

Share your 4850/4870 Benchmarks w/ 8.7 drivers

Forum Graphics & Displays : AMD Radeon Share your 4850/4870 Benchmarks w/ 8.7 drivers

Word :    Username :           
 
- 0 +

For anyone posting benchmarks, if you'd be so kind as to state which driver you were using previously and what benchmarks you got with that (assuming you know that info), in addition to the benchmark with the new official 8.7 drivers.

Reply to rafer
Register or log in to remove.
- 0 +

I'd like to see these to anyone have?

Reply to mf2385

Give it some time to percolate, remember they just launched today.

------------------------------ Knowledge of Non-Knowledge is POWER - Fubar 2

 

Reply to TheGreatGrapeApe

Oh yeah, forgot about them coming out. Probably just 3DMark score increases and xfire fixes...I don't have any expectations for the singe GPU. This will give me something to do with my insomnia tonight :)

P.S. Guru3D used RivaTuner 2.09 in their 4870x2 review....does it support the R700 family now? I missed that announcement if it does...the last I heard it wasn't supporting them. Plus it doesn't say that it supports them...huh?



Performance Improvements

The following performance gains are noticed with this release of Catalyst™.

* 3DMark Vantage: Performance increases of up to 20% is noticed in the Performance Preset on single card configured systems when using ATI Radeon™ HD 36xx or ATI Radeon™ HD 34xx products
* Company of Heroes DX10: Performance increases of 3% to 12% is noticed in specific maps on single card configured systems when using either an ATI Radeon™ HD 48xx, ATI Radeon ™ HD 38xx, or an ATI Radeon™ HD 36xx product
* Lost Planet DX10: Performance increases of 4% to 15% is noticed in specific maps on single card configured systems when using either an ATI Radeon™ HD 48xx, ATI Radeon™ HD 38xx, or an ATI Radeon™ HD 36xx product
* Call Of Duty 4 DX9: Performance increases of up to 4% in specific maps is noticed on single card configured systems when using an ATI Radeon™ HD 48xx product
* Lost Planet DX9: CrossFire™ scaling improves up to 1.7x and performance increases up to 80% across all Radeon™ products when AA and AF is enabled



Well, off the bat my temps are lower.
http://img178.imageshack.us/img178/621/40cwe9.png

Huh...I didn't believe this at first but the air coming out of the back isn't even hot. I can't find my dig thermometer to measure the exhaust but it is hardly warm.
http://img247.imageshack.us/img247/4921/40loadyt5.png

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by SpinachEater on 07-22-2008 at 08:04:13 AM
Reply to SpinachEater

Did you mod the fan speed or is that by default in the driver now?

I had to boost the fan speed on the 4850 with the 8.6 driver in order to get the temps down - my other PC isn't as cool running as my main one though.

Haven't tried 8.7 yet

Reply to ovaltineplease

Wow you are running a 4GHz memory clock. Crazy. I would like to see how far the GPU will go OCing on air. The highest I ever got my 2900Pro 1GB was 815MHz. But I decided that was not a very good idea to run consitently.

------------------------------ http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/2290513.png
Reply to jimmysmitty

Yeah I did mod the fanspeed. I like setting it to a select speed rather than have it bump up to 80% then drop to 5%. I didn't check though to see if the fan management was improved on the default profile.

Reply to SpinachEater

I wasn't even paying attention to the memory clocks in GPUz. That is not correct. I slipped in the updated version 2.6 and it corrected it. This is with the AMDtool OC hack + fan fix. Let the card frying begin!

http://img292.imageshack.us/img292/1620/ocamdqs2.png


Message edited by SpinachEater on 07-23-2008 at 02:57:11 AM
Reply to SpinachEater
- 0 +

Running 2 4850's in Crossfire. Ran the Performance test at 1680x1050. With 3DMark Vantage I get a GPU Score of 7122 and a CPU Score of 4425. Previoulsly my GPU score was in the area of 4500 but I dont beleive i had things configured right when I originally ran it, I dont think all of the boost was from the drivers as much as me tweaking a few things.

Asus M3a32 Deluxe
Athlon 64 X2 6000+ (No Overclocking)
2x Radeon 4850'2 (3 Monitors, Crossfire for gaming)
4 Gigs DDR 2 800
Vista Ultimate X64

Reply to AdioKIP

Anybody with a 4xxx series, if you have Crysis, try running it with AAQ on. Im seeing in other forums theres barely any hit using AA with crysis with these drivers and the 4xxxs

------------------------------ If we lose this freedom of ours, history will record with the greatest astonishment, those who had the most to lose, did the least to prevent its happening
Reply to JAYDEEJOHN

Wow, this cooler is a champ. I am liking this card more and more.
http://img520.imageshack.us/img520/6360/820100050ul5.png

Reply to SpinachEater

Wow, Spinach. Those temps are way cooler than what everyone is complaining about. How did you manage to swing 40C/55C??


Message edited by hispeed120 on 07-23-2008 at 05:46:04 AM
Reply to hispeed120

you just make a profile and then adjust the fan speed in the profilename.xml

set fan control to manual and speed to whatever

Generally, that will bring the temps of the gpu die down a lot

Reply to ovaltineplease

I put OCZ freeze on when I first got the card and am running at 50% fan speed. Having a constant fan speed helps a lot. The auto setting cycle between 5% and 80% speeds...it is really loud and annoying when it vents the hot air at 80%. I can deal with a constant 50% when I am gaming though.

Reply to SpinachEater

Spinacheater do you find there is any additional AA performance increase with this driver?

Reply to ovaltineplease

I haven't checked yet, I have just been playing around with the temps/AMDtool tonight. What bench do you want to see?

Reply to SpinachEater

Hm..

If you have them...

Grid with CSAA edge detect, Crysis with any AA setting - if you don't have Crysis then maybe CoD4 CSAA ED

Those are the ones i'm most curious about I think.

Reply to ovaltineplease

Ok, here is a quick preview for the Crysis bench....need some sleep so I will cut it short for now. I can't get it in x64 for some reason and it says demo-benchmark....whatever.

Beginning Run #1 on Map-island, Demo-benchmark_gpu
DX9 1680x1050, AA=No AA, Vsync=Disabled, 32 bit test, Windowed
Demo Loops=1, Time Of Day= 7
Global Game Quality: High
==============================================================
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
Play Time: 47.32s,
Average FPS: 42.26
Min FPS: 32.86 at frame 1300,
Max FPS: 53.50 at frame 1011

Average Tri/Sec: -37931272, Tri/Frame: -897514
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -1.02
TimeDemo Play Ended, (1 Runs Performed)



Beginning Run #1 on Map-island, Demo-benchmark_gpu
DX9 1680x1050, AA=2x, Vsync=Disabled, 32 bit test, Windowed
Demo Loops=1, Time Of Day= 7
Global Game Quality: High
==============================================================
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
Play Time: 56.90s,
Average FPS: 35.15
Min FPS: 24.41 at frame 146,
Max FPS: 43.93 at frame 999

Average Tri/Sec: -30706284, Tri/Frame: -873669
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -1.05
TimeDemo Play Ended, (1 Runs Performed)

Reply to SpinachEater
- 0 +

Is the ability to run a benchmark built into crysis or do I need a seperate program besides the game itself to run a crysis benchmark?

Reply to AdioKIP

Pretty sure Crysis comes with one.

Reply to mathiasschnell
- 0 +

Not built in to crysis but I googled and found the crysis benchmark tool. Thanks...

Reply to AdioKIP
- 0 +

It is actually built in, but you have to dig around a bit to find it.

Reply to cjl
- 0 +

spinach do you have a 4850 or 4870?

I searched your posts and your profile and couldn't find it...

Reply to thogrom
- 0 +

My Crysis Benchmark. Kinda dissapointing running in crossfire and this is all I get:


7/23/2008 8:17:34 PM - Vista 64
Beginning Run #1 on Map-island, Demo-benchmark_gpu
DX9 1680x1050, AA=2x, Vsync=Disabled, 64 bit test, FullScreen
Demo Loops=3, Time Of Day= 7
Global Game Quality: High
==============================================================
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
Play Time: 70.23s, Average FPS: 28.48
Min FPS: 18.29 at frame 1930, Max FPS: 40.74 at frame 1569
Average Tri/Sec: -17759584, Tri/Frame: -623596
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -1.47
!TimeDemo Run 1 Finished.
Play Time: 62.08s, Average FPS: 32.21
Min FPS: 16.48 at frame 1940, Max FPS: 47.11 at frame 91
Average Tri/Sec: -20033294, Tri/Frame: -621877
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -1.47
!TimeDemo Run 2 Finished.
Play Time: 61.81s, Average FPS: 32.36
Min FPS: 16.48 at frame 1940, Max FPS: 48.79 at frame 72
Average Tri/Sec: -20115148, Tri/Frame: -621629
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -1.47
TimeDemo Play Ended, (3 Runs Performed)
==============================================================

Completed All Tests

<><><><><><><><><><><><><>>--SUMMARY--<<><><><><><><><><><><><><>

7/23/2008 8:17:34 PM - Vista 64

Run #1- DX9 1680x1050 AA=2x, 64 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 32.285

Reply to AdioKIP

SpinachEater wrote :

Ok, here is a quick preview for the Crysis bench....need some sleep so I will cut it short for now. I can't get it in x64 for some reason and it says demo-benchmark....whatever.

Beginning Run #1 on Map-island, Demo-benchmark_gpu
DX9 1680x1050, AA=No AA, Vsync=Disabled, 32 bit test, Windowed
Demo Loops=1, Time Of Day= 7
Global Game Quality: High
==============================================================
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
Play Time: 47.32s,
Average FPS: 42.26
Min FPS: 32.86 at frame 1300,
Max FPS: 53.50 at frame 1011

Average Tri/Sec: -37931272, Tri/Frame: -897514
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -1.02
TimeDemo Play Ended, (1 Runs Performed)



Beginning Run #1 on Map-island, Demo-benchmark_gpu
DX9 1680x1050, AA=2x, Vsync=Disabled, 32 bit test, Windowed
Demo Loops=1, Time Of Day= 7
Global Game Quality: High
==============================================================
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
Play Time: 56.90s,
Average FPS: 35.15
Min FPS: 24.41 at frame 146,
Max FPS: 43.93 at frame 999

Average Tri/Sec: -30706284, Tri/Frame: -873669
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -1.05
TimeDemo Play Ended, (1 Runs Performed)




Would you say this was an improvement over 8.6 catalyst or just the same more or less?

Reply to ovaltineplease
- 0 +

could people please state whether they're using a 4850, 4870? (or more than one)

Reply to rafer

Is that the default cooler SpinachEater, because if it is, 45% fan is impossibly loud.

Reply to The_Abyss
- 0 +

45% isnt that loud. On the other hand, setting mine to 70% gets the jet engine started.

------------------------------ Q9400 @3.2Ghz-HD4870 512MB GDDR5-2GB DDR2-1066
"You figured it out. All new CPU's are nothing but overclocked Pentium 1's with a few bells and whistles added, ask any ol timer whose been around."

 

Reply to bfellow

SpinachEater wrote :

Oh yeah, forgot about them coming out.



Me too. Thanks for the info about them coming out... period.

I have my CoD4 FPS limit currently set to 200FPS... looks like I'm going to need to raise it to 300 :P

------------------------------ E8400 3.6Ghz | 4GB DDR2-800 | HD4870 | 780GB HDD Space | VX550W | WinXP | Win7-64 | Ubuntu Studio 8.10

 

Reply to doomsdaydave11

thogrom wrote :

spinach do you have a 4850 or 4870?

I searched your posts and your profile and couldn't find it...




I got a Sapphire 4870 with the stock cooler. My extra info has my system setup. I have an Antec900 so I already hear a whooshing noise form the case fans. at 45% I can hear the VGA cooler over the case fans but it doesn't have that hair dryer high pitched noise...just a louder whoosh.

I did a quick few minutes of Crysis on the new drivers and it seems the same to me. I haven't had the chance look into it deeper but here is my master plan; I dual boot Vista and XP. I haven't updated the drivers on Vista yet so I will benchmark with 8.6, upgrade, and then benchmark with 8.7 to see what is up with Crysis. I don't have much time though right this week.


Message edited by SpinachEater on 07-24-2008 at 09:03:06 PM
Reply to SpinachEater

Ok, I will actually post some 3DMark06 stuff.

Really not too much of an improvement.

3DMark06, 8.6 Drivers- 13053
3DMark06, 8.7 Drivers- 13141

Good enough for me. I mean, they're drivers.

------------------------------ E8400 3.6Ghz | 4GB DDR2-800 | HD4870 | 780GB HDD Space | VX550W | WinXP | Win7-64 | Ubuntu Studio 8.10

 

Reply to doomsdaydave11

Here are my results:

3DMark06, 8.6 Drivers- 18133
3DMark06, 8.7 Drivers- 18587


Q9450 @ 3.2 water cooled, Velociraptor, 4GB 1066 Raptors, HD 4870 Crossfire OC 790/1000, Corsair 740W, Antec 1200.

Reply to AAArDvArK

Did xfire improve in any games?

Reply to SpinachEater

Yes, WIC gave me considerably higher scores in the built in benchmarks, like 5-10% increase. Somewhat better scaling, but I still expect there is room for driver improvment.

Reply to AAArDvArK
- 0 +

RIG SPECS

ECS GF7060VT-M mATX MB which features NVIDIA MCP73V Chipset

Intel E8400@3.6GHZ cooled with Cooler Master TX 2

Corsair XMS2 DDR2 RAM@800mhz (OC for MB)

PSU Corsair TX650W

Custom Fry's GQ mATX case with 1 fan on video card, 1 lower front in, 1 exhaust

OS XP w/SP3

PowerColor HD4850 Core@700mhz vRAM@effective 2310Mhz
Stock fan on HD4850 with fan controls edited


3dMark06 best score so far..... 13,419 3DMarks

http://service.futuremark.com/resu [...] ultType=14



Before this weekend is over I'm going to upgrade CPU fan to Zalman CNPS700 LED and apply Zalman Super Thermal Grease to CPU, NB, HD4850 GPU and vRAM if possible.


I have Antec Formula 5 on my E8400 right now so I'm a little histant to put the Zalman Super grease on everthing but I've read that it is just as good as AS5 or AF5.

I went to Fry's today to look for Tuniq TX-2 to put on the HD4850 and didn't find any. I did find the Zalman CNPS9700 LED on sale for $39.99 so I decided to but it and get the grease included. :D

Reply to SonDa5
Register or log in to remove.
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphics & Displays > AMD Radeon > Share your 4850/4870 Benchmarks w/ 8.7 drivers
Go to:

There are 1687 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
Ads
Latest best answer
I need a new video card - Help?
By Pinhedd, 1 hour ago:

6670 1GB hands down. The 6570 is less powerful and has inferior GDDR3 RAM which is vastly...

Best offers
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them
Top experts