Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > HD4870 1GB benchmarks?

HD4870 1GB benchmarks?

Forum Graphic & Displays : Graphics Cards - HD4870 1GB benchmarks?

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

Is there any 4870 1GB benchmarks? I cant find any and I see already these cards selling. Its very interesting to me what kind of advantage they have over the 4870 512MB and if they are getting closer to GTX280 performance

Anyone?

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

There's 4870s with 1 GB out? Where?

Reply to mathiasschnell

rawsteel wrote :

Is there any 4870 1GB benchmarks? I cant find any and I see already these cards selling. Its very interesting to me what kind of advantage they have over the 4870 512MB and if they are getting closer to GTX280 performance

Anyone?



I have not seen anything on the 4870 1gb. Only the 4850 1gb, but no benchmarks to with those. I will tell you that if you play at very high resoluions then you can expect to see an increase in performance, but dont expect it to be substantial unless they change the clocks speeds along with the additional memory. The 1gb of memory is somewhat, for lack of a better term, "bottlenecked" by the 256bit width that the 48xx series architecture offers imo (I suppose I could be incorrect). Hope this helps.

Best,

3Ball

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by 3Ball on 07-24-2008 at 06:16:47 PM
------------------------------ ASUS P5Q Pro P45 Motherboard
Intel C2Q Q9550 @ 3.40ghz w/ (8.5x400mhz, 1.2125v, Zalman 9500 & 24+ Hours Prime95 Stable)
6gb G. Skill DDR2 6400 @ 800mhz w/ (5-5-5-15: 2T, 2.04v)
EVGA GTX275 @ 660mhz/1550mhz/2400mhz
Reply to 3Ball

yep pretty much the 4870 will probably not use all of it unless at very high res.
we all know the 9600GT/8800GT will 1 gb

Reply to sabot00

Different architectures use the memory differently though I think. 8800GT/9600GT barely make use of 1 GB of memory no matter what res you play at (based on benchmarks), but 4850/4870 may be different in that aspect. We'll have to wait and see though.

Reply to mathiasschnell

the 1GB version is selling in UK already www.overclockers.co.uk but that can be a mistype, although it cost 240 GBP :)

Reply to rawsteel



Yea it says pre-order so I guess we will be seeing them relatively soon.

Best,

3Ball

------------------------------ ASUS P5Q Pro P45 Motherboard
Intel C2Q Q9550 @ 3.40ghz w/ (8.5x400mhz, 1.2125v, Zalman 9500 & 24+ Hours Prime95 Stable)
6gb G. Skill DDR2 6400 @ 800mhz w/ (5-5-5-15: 2T, 2.04v)
EVGA GTX275 @ 660mhz/1550mhz/2400mhz
Reply to 3Ball

:O right :)

I have overlooked it and didn't notice its preorder

Reply to rawsteel

3Ball wrote :

The 1gb of memory is somewhat, for lack of a better term, "bottlenecked" by the 256bit width that the 48xx series architecture offers imo (I suppose I could be incorrect). Hope this helps.



I don't know if this is necessary true. The frequency and nature of the GDDR5 memory lessens the effect of that 'bottleneck.'

Reply to hispeed120

hispeed120 wrote :

I don't know if this is necessary true. The frequency and nature of the GDDR5 memory lessens the effect of that 'bottleneck.'



That is true to an extent, but we will have to see some benchies to see if speed alone can address that amount of memory through the more narrow path. Time will tell.

Best,

3Ball

------------------------------ ASUS P5Q Pro P45 Motherboard
Intel C2Q Q9550 @ 3.40ghz w/ (8.5x400mhz, 1.2125v, Zalman 9500 & 24+ Hours Prime95 Stable)
6gb G. Skill DDR2 6400 @ 800mhz w/ (5-5-5-15: 2T, 2.04v)
EVGA GTX275 @ 660mhz/1550mhz/2400mhz
Reply to 3Ball

oh wow seems like its possible for the 4xxx series of cards to kick nvidia's ass even more lol.

------------------------------ intel core 2 quad q6600 @3.2ghz msi p6n diamond (X-FI Extreme sound) 6gig of OCZ+CoRSAIR oc 900mhz Nvidia gtx 260 sli @ 730/1465/1250
Lite-On Blue-ray Western Digital 7200rpm 500gb Antec 500 Earthwatt Window vista 64-bit
Reply to invisik

Agreed. This is finally what I have been waiting for to fully utilize my 24" monitor.

Reply to hispeed120
- -1 +

3Ball wrote :

That is true to an extent, but we will have to see some benchies to see if speed alone can address that amount of memory through the more narrow path. Time will tell.

Best,

3Ball


It has more bandwidth than either an 8800 ultra, or a GTX 260, and with mild overclocking it can even beat a GTX 280 in bandwidth.

It won't be bottlenecked.

Reply to cjl

you can pre order it and it may not be out yet, but shouldnt a website such as Tom's Hardware or another like it have gotten their hands on one already and benched it already? they usually get their hands on these things well before they hit production so they can reveal the results and the companies who make them let them get benched by Tom's Hardware and others so they can try to sell them before they're out... it's a dirty game y'all

Reply to jonpaul37

cjl wrote :

It has more bandwidth than either an 8800 ultra, or a GTX 260, and with mild overclocking it can even beat a GTX 280 in bandwidth.

It won't be bottlenecked.



What % increase are you expecting the extra memory to yield?

Best,

3Ball


Message edited by 3Ball on 07-24-2008 at 07:51:26 PM
------------------------------ ASUS P5Q Pro P45 Motherboard
Intel C2Q Q9550 @ 3.40ghz w/ (8.5x400mhz, 1.2125v, Zalman 9500 & 24+ Hours Prime95 Stable)
6gb G. Skill DDR2 6400 @ 800mhz w/ (5-5-5-15: 2T, 2.04v)
EVGA GTX275 @ 660mhz/1550mhz/2400mhz
Reply to 3Ball

I'd expect a significant boost at 2560x1600, and even 1920x1200 with AA in more recent games. I wouldn't expect miracles though, and I'd be surprised to see any difference at all at lower resolutions (<1920x1200).

Reply to cjl

cjl wrote :

I'd expect a significant boost at 2560x1600, and even 1920x1200 with AA in more recent games. I wouldn't expect miracles though, and I'd be surprised to see any difference at all at lower resolutions (<1920x1200).



Yea depending on the game I can understand increases at 2560x1600 and not as high, but also some at 1920x1200. That is the case with most cards when there is a memory increase. Like I said there would be an increase at higher resolutions, but the overall speed of the card imo will not change much on average. Though once again...I could be wrong. Just goin by what history has shown us.

Best,

3Ball


Message edited by 3Ball on 07-24-2008 at 08:44:55 PM
------------------------------ ASUS P5Q Pro P45 Motherboard
Intel C2Q Q9550 @ 3.40ghz w/ (8.5x400mhz, 1.2125v, Zalman 9500 & 24+ Hours Prime95 Stable)
6gb G. Skill DDR2 6400 @ 800mhz w/ (5-5-5-15: 2T, 2.04v)
EVGA GTX275 @ 660mhz/1550mhz/2400mhz
Reply to 3Ball

superclocked versions of the 4870 are going to be available soon with core speeds up to 850 and memore over 4GHz. 4GHz is more bandwidth than the GTX280 so we will see raw core chip comparison in performance

Reply to rawsteel

The best way of using this card is cf use, where prosessing power is not the issue.

Reply to hannibal

rawsteel wrote :

superclocked versions of the 4870 are going to be available soon with core speeds up to 850 and memore over 4GHz. 4GHz is more bandwidth than the GTX280 so we will see raw core chip comparison in performance



Yea those will be some beasts! lol

Best,

3Ball

------------------------------ ASUS P5Q Pro P45 Motherboard
Intel C2Q Q9550 @ 3.40ghz w/ (8.5x400mhz, 1.2125v, Zalman 9500 & 24+ Hours Prime95 Stable)
6gb G. Skill DDR2 6400 @ 800mhz w/ (5-5-5-15: 2T, 2.04v)
EVGA GTX275 @ 660mhz/1550mhz/2400mhz
Reply to 3Ball

yeah cores will be over 950 ... and the ram is supposed to go upto 4.8 ghz...

I think the magic places are 1 ghz core clocks and 5 ghz memory... that would be sweet

Reply to thogrom

5GHz is such a stupidly high clock speed for a factory part.

I love it :D

Reply to cjl

cjl wrote :

5GHz is such a stupidly high clock speed for a factory part.

I love it :D



lol, agreed!

Best,

3Ball


Message edited by 3Ball on 07-24-2008 at 11:01:44 PM
------------------------------ ASUS P5Q Pro P45 Motherboard
Intel C2Q Q9550 @ 3.40ghz w/ (8.5x400mhz, 1.2125v, Zalman 9500 & 24+ Hours Prime95 Stable)
6gb G. Skill DDR2 6400 @ 800mhz w/ (5-5-5-15: 2T, 2.04v)
EVGA GTX275 @ 660mhz/1550mhz/2400mhz
Reply to 3Ball
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > HD4870 1GB benchmarks?
Go to:

There are 1068 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them